and THE UNIFIED THEORY

by

WILSON OGG

The postulates, working hypotheses, and premises applicable to the Enfolding Universe led to the discovery of principles of conservation and equivalency. Under the principle of conservation, the mass, energy, and consciousness manifested in any given segue is constant and finite, with the result that a constant and finite number of focal points participate in the manifestation of consciousness in evolution in any given segue. The finite number of focal points have an infinite number of dimensions, and these focal points are points of convergence, merger, and union arising from the synchronous enfolding of force and form. It is at these points of convergence that motion, time, and space are born.

Under the principles of equivalency, frequency and velocity of light are not measures of motion but are measures of different dimensions of the same active force and are equivalent. The treatmewnt of motion as frequency or as velocity and of motion as time or as space is dependent upon the utilization of both the Cartesian and the progressive natural reference systems, one of the four reference systems recognized and used by the Unified Theory. As a result of these principles of equivalency, in conjunction with the principle of conservation, commutative mathematics and the Cartesian coordinates should be applicable to the phenomena of any given segue of the universe. Applied mathematics is generally based on the applicability of commutative mathematical principles to phenomena that, in final analysis, are treatable as equivalent with one another.

The Two-way flow of consciousness in evolution is not dependent upon motion, time, or space. It is the two-way from the microcosm to the macrocosm and from the macrocosm to the microcosm that gives rise to motion, space and time and to frequency and velocity, which thereafter makes practicable the use of commutativer mathematics. The flow from the microcosm and from the mscrocosm are not two flows that are equivalent one to the other. It is partly for this reason that the use of non-cmmutative mathematical principles, such as those formulated by G. Spencer Brown in his work Laws of Form , are better able to describe the two-way flow than are principles of commutative marhematics. Bretrand Russell said that G. Spencer Brown in the Laws of Form "has succeeded in doing what, in mathematics, is very rare indeed. He has revealed a new calculus, of great power and simplicity..." The non-commutative mathematics of Spencer Brown are well suited as being applicable to the two-way flow.

The attributes of the two-way flow of consciousness in evolution lead to the enfolding of force and form and to the separation of consciousness into yang and yin aspects. The flow being inherent in the nature of infinity is the means by which separation into yang and yin aspects develops. The impetus to form might be described as a yang urge to a yin form, and thus yang and yin might be said to arise from the two-way flow.

Yang and yin are not equivalent one with the other, but space and time and frequency and velocity utilize yang and yin aspects of consciousness in evolution. Thus, the non-equivalency of yang and yin does not affect the equivalency of space and time and of frequency and velocity. In fact, it is the combination of yang and yin that leads to the diversity of phenomena in our segue and to principlesa of equivalency applicable to the phenomena of space and time and of frequency and velocvity.

Many scientists presuppose that space has three dimensions and that time has one dimension. They take this presupposition for granted, even though the presupposition is not supported by phenomenological investigation or by the progressive reference system and has led to much confusion in analyses of space and time and of velocity and frequency. Under relativity physics, time is somewhat arbitrarily treated as a fourth dimension to space, with the equivalency of frequency and velocity being ignored, and under Newtonian physics time and space were each treated as absolutes and not relative one to the other.

The Unified Theory not only allows the use of the Galileian and Gaussian co-ordinates of the Cartesian reference system to the dimensionalty of time and space but also allows the use of the progressive, recessional, and sychronous referece systems. The dimensionality of time and space differs under which reference system is used. Under a modified Cartesian reference system, the Unified Theory recognizes that both frequency and velocity are space-time phenomenological units of manifestation, with velocity being based upon three dimensions of space and one dimenstions of time and with frequency being based upon three dimensions of time and one dimension of space. As a result of the principles of equivalency, the spatial and temporal dimensions are equivalent with one another. The actual velocities and frequencies of phenomena in our segue are necessarily group velocities and frequencies and not pure velocities and frequencies. Thus, a given velocity does not necessarily have three dimensions of space and one dimension of time and a given frequency does not necessarily have three dimensions of time with one of space.

Under a synchronous reference system, the difference between velocity and frequency would not be explained in terms of spatial and temporal attributes but in terms of distinctions between centripetal and centrifugal forces. There would be no need for the principle of equivalency, which is needed only where the Catresian reference system is used. Where the progressive reference system is used, the reciprocal aspects of time and space might be used to explain the equivaslency of velocity and frequency.

Dimensionality is infinite not only in the sense that there are an infinite number of dimensions but also in the sense that each dimension is infinitely divisible. For this reason, each space-time manifestation contains the past, present and future and is necessarily a part of the "eternal now" and each space-time manifestation also necessarily contains the universe. Einstein`s failure to succeed in the formulation of an Unified Theory apparently was not only a result of his treating light as radiant energy instead of as an active force but also a result of his failure to grasp the nature of infinity. It was the infinity of dimensionality, and the nature of infinity, that led to the discovery under the Unified Theory of the synchronous reference system to which principles of non-commutative mathematics would be ideally suited.

Light is manifestated under the eternal flow where a point of origination converges or merges with a point of extinction. Light necessarily is infinitely divisible, with a point of convergence occurring an infinite number of times in an infinite number of segues. Thus, Einstein`s failure to understand light was related to his failure to understand infinity. His failure to understand that a flow to a point of extinction was a part of a flow to a point of origination and that the union of these two flows resulted in the manifestation of light also led to his failure to formulate a satsifactory explanation of gravity, which is clearly a movement of phenomena to a point of extinction of matter and towards the "black hole."

© Wilson Ogg