FILE: 251N03.HTML
CLASS NOTES FOR ECONOMICS 251/ FALL 2005
DR. WILLIAM SHINGLETON
THESE NOTES ARE FOR SEPTEMBER 6-8
ROLE OF GOVERNMENT AND TAXES CH 4
REVIEW QUIZ
IT'S AS EASY AS A,
B, C
NECESSARY CONDITIONS TO JUSTIFY A GOVERNMENT'S ATTEMPTS TO
USE ITS ECONOMIC POLICY TOOLS
THERE MUST BE A
PRIVATE SECTOR PROBLEM.
GOVERNMENT MUST
HAVE ABILITY TO ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM
UNLESS BOTH
CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED,
THERE IS NO
ECONOMIC REASON FOR GOVERNMENT ACTION
POLITICAL/SOCIAL
ROLES STILL POSSIBLE
POLICY TOOLS
REGULATION
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
VS GOVERNMENT FINANCING
/2.3TRILLION/AUG2004/OMB
TAXES
/1.9 TRILLION/AUG2004/OMB
DEFICIT
/455B/AUG2004/OMB
ECONOMIC ROLES OF GOVERNMENT, EACH SUBJECT TO QUESTION
LEGAL/SOCIAL/POLITICAL
ENVIRONMENT
CORRECTION OF
MARKET FAILURE
PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC
GOODS
EXCLUSION PRINCIPLE
PROVIDE FOR, NOT
PRODUCE
RADIO
EXTERNALITIES (SPILLOVER COSTS)
A SWEET EXAMPLE
JERSEY SKY
INDUSTRIAL
CONCENTRATION/MAINTAIN COMPETITION
DISTRIBUTION(REDISTRIBUTION) OF
INCOME
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
STABILIZATION OF
THE ECONOMY (MACRO ECONOMICS)
PRICE CONTROLS (FROM CHAPTER 3)
FLOOR/MINIMUM
PRICES
EXAMPLE:
MINIMUM WAGES $5.15/SEPT 2005
EFFECTIVE
ONLY WHEN ABOVE EQUILIBRIUM
COMPARE
Q TO FREE MARKET
IDENTIFY
WINNERS AND LOSERS
UNEMPLOYMENT
PROBLEM
DISCRIMINATION
FRIEDMAN
ON BLACK TEENAGE UNEMPLOYMENT
DOES
SOCIETY GAIN?
CEILING/MAXIMUM
PRICES
EXAMPLE:
WHOLESALE GAS PRICE IN HAWAII
EFFECTIVE
ONLY WHEN BELOW EQUILIBRIUM
COMPARE
Q TO FREE MARKET
IDENTIFY
WINNERS AND LOSERS
POLITICAL
IMPLICATIONS
BLACK
MARKETS
DOES
SOCIETY GAIN?
COMPARE MINIMUM PRICE AND MAXIMUM PRICE OUTCOMES
BOTH REDUCE THE Q
THAT IS ACTUALLY BOUGHT AND SOLD
Q IS ALWAYS THE
SMALLER OF Qd
OR Qs
PUBLIC
GOODS: DEFINITION
NOT NECESSARILY
PRODUCED BY THE GOVERNMENT
DEPLETABILITY
RIVAL VS NON-RIVAL
CONSUMPTION
EXCLUSIVE VS
NON-EXCLUSIVE GOODS
EXAMPLE: RADIO
OPTIMAL PRIVATE VS
OPTIMAL Q OF PUBLIC GOODS
UNDERPRODUCED IN MARKET
HORIZONTAL VS
VERTICAL DEMAND
PROBLEM: FREE
RIDERS
GOAL: OPTIMAL Q OF
PUBLIC GOODS
EXAMPLE: ADAM
SMITH'S LIGHTHOUSE THEN AND NOW
GOVERNMENT
FINANCING REVIEW
NOT JUST GARBAGE
ROLE OF PRICE
COMPETITION
EXTERNALITIES
PROBLEM: SPILLOVER
COSTS
GOAL: INCORPORATION
OF ALL COSTS
(MARGINAL SOCIAL COST)
EXAMPLE: LIVING
NEAR BURNS HARBOR
MARKET POWER
PROBLEM: INDUSTRIAL
CONCENTRATION
GOAL: TO MAINTAIN
COMPETITION
EXAMPLE: MICROSOFT
DISTRIBUTION(REDISTRIBUTION) OF
INCOME
PROBLEM: WHAT IS
FAIR VS WHAT IS EFFICIENT?
GOAL: ACHIEVE THE
CORRECT BALANCE
EXAMPLE: HEALTH
CARE
ALLOCATION OF
RESOURCES
PROBLEM: SOME
RESOURCES UNDERDIRECTED
GOAL: ACHIEVE THE
CORRECT BALANCE
EXAMPLE: EDUCATION
TAXES
AVERAGE
TAX RATE
MARGINAL
TAX RATE
PROGRESSIVE
PROPORTIONAL
REGRESSIVE
TAXES AS A COST
TAX AND SUPPLY
TAX AND EQUILIBRIUM
EFFECT ON
PRICE
QUANTITY
PUBLIC CHOICE
SELF INTERESTED
DECISIONS
BUCHANAN VS DOWNS
THE BUDGET IS
ALWAYS TOO BIG BECAUSE...
THE BUDGET IS
ALWAYS TOO SMALL BECAUSE...
MARKET EXAMPLES, AS TIME PERMITS
NEXT WEEK
DEMAND AND ELASTICITY CH
20+APPNDX