FILE: 251N04.HTML

 

BRING ELASTICITY PROPS

 

CLASS NOTES FOR ECONOMICS 251

DR. WILLIAM SHINGLETON

FALL 2005/WEEK 4/SEPT 13-15

 

SEP17    DEMAND                         CH 20+APPNDX

 

REVIEW QUIZ

IT'S AS EASY AS A, B, C

 

EXAM SEPT 22

25 MULTIPLE CHOICE/ 3 POINTS EACH

1 25 POINT ESSAY

CLOSED BOOK/CLOSED NOTE/TIME LIMIT

CHAPTER 21 IS NOT ON THIS EXAM

 

 

LAST WEEK

 

COMPARE MINIMUM PRICE, MAXIMUM PRICE, AND TAX OUTCOMES

ALL REDUCE THE Q THAT IS ACTUALLY BOUGHT AND SOLD

 


ELASTICITY OF DEMAND

LOGIC

 

DEFINITION

ELASTIC VS INELASTIC

PERFECTLY ELASTIC/PERFECTLY INELASTIC

REVENUE AND PRICE PATTERNS

PRICE ELASTICITY AND TOTAL REVENUE

 

LESS COMPLICATED FORMULA

 

EXAMPLE:

FLORIDA FRUIT PRICE RISE FROM $2.00 TO $2.60

CAUSES QUANTITY TO FALL FROM 300 TO 270 TONS

 

PCT CHANGE IN Q = [(30/300)*100]-100 = 10PCT

PCT CHANGE IN P =[(.60/2.00)*100]-100= 30PCT

 

ELASTICITY OF DEMAND = 10/30 = .33

 

 

 


LONG RUN/SHORT RUN

EVERYTHING IS MORE ELASTIC IN THE LONG RUN

EXAMPLES: WINDSHIELD WIPERS, GASOLINE

 

 

OTHER ELASTICITIES

 

GENERAL RULE FOR CAUSE AND EFFECT

INCOME ELASTICITY

NORMAL AND INFERIOR W/O THE MATH

 

CROSS-ELASTICITY

SUBSTITUTES VS COMPLEMENTS W/O THE MATH

 

 


DEMAND THEORY

 

UTILITY THEORY

TOTAL UTILITY/AMAZING ASSUMPTIONS

MARGINAL UTILITY

DIMINISHING MARGINAL UTILITY

CONSUMERS BUY AS LONG AS MU > PRICE

CONSUMER SURPLUS

 

DEMAND FROM MARGINAL UTILITY

 


CHOICE THEORY

THE LOGIC OF CHOICE/  REVEALED PREFERENCE

 

 

WHERE THE BUDGET COMES FROM (AFFORDABILITY)

BUDGET CONSIDERS AFFORDABILITY WITHOUT CONSIDERING

 LIKES/DISLIKES/INCOME

 

WHERE CHANGES IN THE BUDGET SET COME FROM

CHANGES IN INCOME

CHANGES IN PRICES

THE ONLY FACTORS WHICH CAN CHANGE BUDGET SET

TASTES ARE NOT CONSIDERED

 

PRICES

LIMIT = Y/Px

 


BUDGET SET

EFFECTS OF

PRICE CHANGES

INCOME CHANGES

 

 

IMPLICATIONS IF WE ASSUME PEOPLE LIKE MORE RATHER THAN LESS

HIGHER INCOMES MAKE PEOPLE BETTER OFF

LOWER PRICES MAKE PEOPLE BETTER OFF

A GOOD SYSTEM WOULD PROVIDE

1. HIGH INCOMES AND

2. LOW PRICES

 


INDIFFERENCE CURVES

SHOW TASTES WITHOUT COST CONSIDERATIONS

INDIFFERENCE CURVE ASSUMPTIONS

NON-SATIATION

DIMINISHING RETURNS

EXPLAIN PARTITION

 

LIMITS TO INDIFFERENCE CURVES

ONLY DRAW ONES WE ARE INTERESTED IN(COMPLETENESS)

NO CURL BACK

NO INTERSECTION

BOTH ILLOGICAL

 


BUDGETS AND CHOICE THEORY

SHOW CHOICE PROCEDURE

EFFECT OF PRICE CHANGE

EFFECT OF INCOME CHANGE

 

 

SUMMARY OF CHOICE THEORY

1. START AND END AT EQUILIBRIUM

2. LABEL EVERYTHING

3. IDENTIFY AND LOGICALLY DEFEND EACH AND EVERY CHANGE

4.  AT ANY MOMENT IN TIME

ONLY ONE CHOICE IS RELEVANT

ONLY ONE INDIFFERENCE CURVE IS RELEVANT

ONLY ONE BUDGET CURVE IS RELEVANT

5. THE EMPHASIS IS ALWAYS ON "WHY?"

6. THE EXPLANATION IS THE IMPORTANT PART OF THE ANSWER

 


DEMAND CURVE CONSTRUCTION

INDIVIDUAL DEMAND TO MARKET DEMAND

 

MARKET EXAMPLES, AS TIME PERMITS