AS THE ECONOMY TURNS
GET OUT OF JAIL FREE, SO FAR
Dr. William Shingleton
October 22, 2005
Last week the Treasury announced the good news about the federal budget. In a joint statement from JOHN W. SNOW,
Secretary Of The Treasury, and Joshua B. Bolten, Director Of The Office Of
Management And Budget, in the “Budget Results For Fiscal Year 2005”, they said
that “the actual budget totals for the fiscal year that ended September 30,
2005” were: TOTAL
RECEIPTS of $2.15 billion; TOTAL OUTLAYS of $2.47 billion; and a BUDGET DEFICIT
of $319 billion [SOURCE:
October 14, 2005 http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js2973.htm js-2973]. The total receipts are mostly taxes and fees
paid to the federal government; the total outlays represent all of the federal
spending on all of its many projects,
programs, and boondoggles; and the budget deficit is supposed to tell us how
much the federal government had to borrow last year (on a net basis) so that
its checks didn’t bounce. There is so
much fun in these numbers it’s hard to know where to start.
For instance, if you cut the baloney and do a legitimate report on
the deficit, the numbers are quite different.
Consider what a BUDGET DEFICIT is supposed to represent. It is money that you spent that you did not
take in as income and had to borrow instead.
The definition doesn’t change whether we are talking about an individual
consumer or about the federal government.
When you borrow money in order to spend it you add to your DEBT, which
is the total amount of money you are obligated to pay back some day. [NOTE: The federal government is not
obligated to pay any of it back; all they have to do is keep rolling it over,
as we’ll see in another report.] For
example, if I have no savings and owe $60,000 on my house and then this year I decide,
without paying anything off or actually saving any money, to borrow $25,000 for
a new car my total debt goes from $60,000 to $85,000 and my deficit is
$25,000. If you don’t know me, or if you
doubt my ability to provide accurate numbers about my income or my spending,
one way for you to find out how much of a budget deficit I have actually run is
to compare the amount of money I owed last year ($60,000) with the amount that
I owe this year ($85,000). The
difference, the $25,000, is what I borrowed this year, my true deficit. Since my numbers are accurate, we get the
same $25,000 in both cases.
But what happens when we apply this approach to the federal
government? According to the BUREAU OF
THE PUBLIC DEBT, at the end of September 2004 our government owed $7.379
trillion and at the end of September 2005 it owed $7.933 trillion [NOTE: The
federal government starts its FISCAL YEAR on the first of October. You don’t
want to know why. SOURCE: http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdhisms.htm]. If
we apply the same accounting rules we used a moment ago we find that the
government actually had a deficit of $553.7 billion rather than the $319
billion they officially reported. Of
course, if a corporation reported that they had borrowed $319 billion when they
had actually borrowed $553.7 billion the top officers would be on their way to
federal prison. But this is the federal
government we are talking about, so these guys will probably get on the David
Letterman show instead. Especially if he
notices that they are now advertising a new program “to teach students how to
budget, use credit cards and build a positive payment history.” [SOURCE: http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js2978.htm>] The kids would probably be better off
sticking to their piggy banks.
So how did they come up with the $553.7 billion to spend that was
not covered by their income? Some of our
older readers may not want to see this, but they got about one third of it
($171.7 billion) by using the money that we paid into SOCIAL SECURITY and its
related programs [NOTE: $1.4 billion from Supplemental Medicaid, $9.3 billion
from Hospital Insurance, $10.0 billion from Disability Insurance, and $151.0
billion from Old Age and Survivors benefits. (As you are no doubt aware, the
rest of the money that we paid into these programs was used to pay out benefits
to current recipients.) SOURCE: Historical
Tables, Table 13.1, http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js2978.htm>]
In an unusual series of transactions (The appropriate adjective
would be “illegal” if you tried it in your business.); the government collected
a little more than a trillion dollars in taxes for these programs. (The taxes
are officially called “contributions”.)
That money they rake in doesn’t technically belong to the federal government;
it belongs to the various social security trust funds. Unfortunately for the “contributors” like us,
the trust fund is run by the federal government. In addition, in a remarkable and fiscally
convenient restriction, the social security trust funds are only allowed to
purchase
They come up with a few other dollars in strange ways also. For instance, a not insignificant $37.1 was indirectly
purchased by the FEDERAL RESERVE during the same period. [SOURCES: http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/20050929/
and 200440930.] The people who wrote the
FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913 were worried about this kind of action when they
wrote the original legislation, so they set up a rule that stops the FEDERAL
RESERVE from buying anything directly from the Treasury. It wasn’t that they didn’t want it to end up
with a bunch of worthless paper like social security but rather they believed
that if the Treasury could sell its debt to the Federal Reserve then the
Treasury would feel free to run its deficits up into the millions of dollars. (That’s millions with an “m” not the billions
with a “b” that we have been talking about.)
Somebody got the bright idea that the Federal Reserve could obey
the law and buy government debt simply by buying in the SECONDARY MARKET. So what happens is that when the Treasury
needs money they sell Bills, Notes, and Bonds in periodic auctions. The Federal Reserve does not participate in
them. Instead, corporations like
CITICORP buy the new stuff and then turn around and sell it to the Federal
Reserve in what is called an OPEN MARKET PURCHASE. Since the Federal Reserve does not participate
in the auction they don’t violate the law.
And since they can buy anything CITICORP has a couple of seconds later
if they want to, then the Federal Reserve gets to pay CITICORP before CITICORP
pays the Treasury. The accounts for the
individual member banks are not settled until the close of the business day.
And where does the Federal Reserve come up with the money to buy
the securities? That’s the beauty of
it. Their payments are made in terms of
FEDERAL RESERVE CREDITS, basically green lights on a computer screen
somewhere. No paper, no cash, no
anything. The Federal Reserve posts a
credit for the member institution on the account the member institution is required
to keep with the Federal Reserve. The
money eventually received by the Treasury is created out of thin air.
Another $172.4 billion toward the deficit represents the increase
in “Marketable securities held in custody for foreign official and international
accounts”. These are
The
There are others, but if we just consider what we have here, we
have $381.2 billion out of the $553.7 billion deficit covered without ever
going directly to the
On the other hand, the INTRAGOVERNMENT DEBT is $3.4 trillion, and
that doesn’t even count the shortfall in the Pension Guarantee Fund. Some day we are going to need that missing
$3.4 trillion and the doubt has to be whether or not future taxpayers are going
to be willing and able to honor our obligations. We may be in a position that is quite similar
to the workers who foolishly chose the DEFINED BENEFIT model for their
pensions. When it came time for the
benefits to be paid the money was not there.
Final notes: If you would
like to be removed from the distribution list just send a reply on email. Back issues are available on my website
<http://www.oocities.org/wsirius30/2cents.html>. The opinions expressed
in these newsletters are those of the author.
Comments, including suggestions for future newsletters, are always
welcome.