CONCLUSIONWe have now examined the Calvinistic system in considerable detail, and have seen its
influence in the Church, in the State, in society, and in education. We have also
considered the objections which are commonly brought against it, and have considered
the practical importance of the system. It now remains for us to make a few general
observations in regard to the system as a whole.A sure test of the character of individuals or of systems is found in Christ's own words:
"By their fruits ye shall know them." By that test Calvinists and Calvinism will gladly be
judged. The lives and the influences of those who have held the Reformed Faith is one of
the best and most conclusive arguments in its favor. Smith refers to "that divinely vital and
exuberant Calvinism, !he creator of the modern world, the mother of heroes, saints and
martyrs in number without number, which history, judging the tree by its fruits, crowns as
the greatest creed of Christendom."1 The impartial verdict of history is that as a character
builder and as a proclaimer of liberty to men and nations Calvinism stands supreme
among all the religious systems of the world. In calling the roll of the great men of our
own country the number of Presbyterian presidents, legislators, jurists, authors, editors,
teachers and business men is vastly disproportionate to the membership of the Church.
Every impartial historian will admit that it was the Protestant revolt against Rome which
gave the modern world its first taste of genuine religious and civil liberty, and,that the
nations which have achieved and enjoyed the greatest freedom have been those which
were most fully brought under the influence of Calvinism. Furthermore that great
life-giving stream of religious and civil liberty has been made by Calvinism to flow over all
the broad plains of modern history. When we compare countries such as England,
Scotland and America, with countries such as France, Spain and Italy, which never came
under the influences of Calvinism, we readily see what the practical results are. The
economic and moral depression in Roman Catholic countries has brought about such a
decrease even in the birth rate that the population in those countries hah become almost
stationary, while the population in these other countries has steadily increased.A brief examination of Church history, or of the historic creeds of Protestantism, readily
shows that the doctrines which today are known as Calvinism were the ones which
brought about the Reformation and preserved its benefits. He who is most familiar with
the history of Europe and America will readily agree with the startling statement of Dr.
Cunningham that, "next to Paul, John Calvin has done most for the world." And Dr.
Smith has well said: "Surely it should stop the mouths of the detractors of Calvinism to
remember that from men of that creed we inherit, as the fruits of their blood and toil, their
prayers and teachings, our civil liberty, our Protestant faith, our Christian homes. The
thoughtful reader, noting that these three blessings lie at the root of all that is best and
greatest in the modern world, may be startled at the implied claim that our present
Christian civilization is but the fruitage of Calvinism."2We do but repeat the very clear testimony of history when we say that Calvinism has
been the creed of saints and heroes. "Whatever the cause," says Froude, "the Calvinists
were the only fighting Protestants. It was they whose faith gave them courage to stand up
for the Reformation, and but for them the Reformation would have been lost." During
those centuries in which spiritual tyranny was numbering its victims by the thousands;
when in England, Scotland, Holland and Switzerland, Protestantism had to maintain itself
with the sword, Calvinism proved itself the only system able to cope with and destroy
the great powers of the Romish Church. Its unequalled array of martyrs is one of its
crowns of glory. In the address of the Methodist Conference to the Presbyterian Alliance
of 1896 it was graciously said: "Your Church has furnished the memorable and inspiring
spectacle, not simply of a solitary heroic soul here and there, but of generations of faithful
souls ready for the sake of Christ and His truth to go cheerfully to prison and to death.
This rare honor you rightly esteem as the most precious part of your priceless heritage."
"There is no other system of religion in the world," says McFetridge, which has such a
glorious array of martyrs to the faith. "Almost every man and woman who walked to the
flames rather than deny the faith or leave a stain on conscience was the devout follower,
not only, and first of all, of the Son of God, but also of that minister of God who made
Geneva the light of Europe, John Calvin."3 To the Divine vitality and fruitfulness of this
system the modern world owes a debt of gratitude which in recent years it is slowly
beginning to recognize but can never repay.We have said that Calvinistic theology develops a liberty loving people. Where it
flourishes despotism cannot abide. As might have been expected, it early gave rise to a
revolutionary form of Church government, in which the people of the Church were to be
governed and ministered to, not by the appointees of any one man or set of men placed
over them, but by pastors and officers elected by themselves. Religion was then with the
people, not over them. Testimony from a remarkable source as to the efficiency of this
government is that of the distinguished Roman Catholic, Archbishop Hughes of New
York: "Though it is my privilege to regard the authority exercised by the General
Assembly as usurpation, still I must say, with every man acquainted with the mode in
which it is organized, that for the purpose of popular and political government its
structure is little inferior to that of Congress itself. It acts on the principle of a radiating
center, and is without an equal or a rival among the other denominations of the country."4From freedom and responsibility in the Church it was only a step to freedom and
responsibility in the State; and historically the cause of freedom has found no braver nor
more resolute champions than the followers of Calvin."Calvinism," says Warburton, "is no dreamy, theoretical creed. It does not, — despite all
the assertions of its adversaries, — encourage a man to fold his arms in a spirit of
fatalistic indifference, and ignore the needs of those around him, together with the crying
evils which lie, like putrifying sores, upon the open face of society."5 Wherever it has
gone marvelous moral transformations have followed in its wake. For purity of life, for
temperance, industry, and charity, the Calvinists have stood without superiors.James Anthony Froude has been recognized as one of England's most able historians
and men of letters. For a number of years he was professor of History at Oxford,
England's greatest university. While he accepted another system for himself, and while his
writings are such that he is often spoken of as an opponent of Calvinism, he was free
from prejudice, and the ignorant attacks upon Calvinism which have been so common in
recent years aroused in him the learned scholar's just impatience."I am going to ask you," says Froude, "to consider how it came to pass that if Calvinism
is indeed the hard and unreasonable creed which modern enlightenment declares it to be,
it has possessed such singular attractions in past times for some of the greatest men that
ever lived; and how — being as we are told, fatal to morality, because it denies free will
— the first symptom of its operation, wherever it established itself, was to obliterate the
distinction between sins and crimes, and to make the moral law the rule of life for States
as well as persons. I shall ask you, again, why, if it be a creed of intellectual servitude, it
was able to inspire and sustain the bravest efforts ever made by man to break the yoke
of unjust authority. When all else has failed, — when patriotism has covered its face and
human courage has broken down, — when intellect has yielded, as Gibbon says, 'with a
smile or a sigh,' content to philosophize in the closet, and abroad worship with the vulgar,
— when emotion, and sentiment, and tender imaginative piety have become the
handmaids of superstition, and have dreamt themselves into forgetfulness that there is any
difference between lies and truth, — the slavish form of belief called Calvinism, in one or
other of its many forms, has borne ever an inflexible front to illusion and mendacity, and
has preferred rather to be ground to powder like flint than to bend before violence or
melt under enervating temptation."To illustrate this Froude mentions William the Silent, Luther, Calvin, Knox, Coligny,
Cromwell, Milton, and Bunyan, and says of them: "These men are possessed of all the
qualities which give nobility and grandeur to human nature, — men whose life was as
upright as their intellect was commanding and their public aims untainted with selfishness;
unalterably just where duty required them to be stern, but with the tenderness of a
woman in their hearts; frank, true, cheerful, humorous, as unlike sour fanatics as it is
possible to imagine anyone, and able in some way to sound the key-note to which every
brave and faithful heart in Europe instinctively vibrated."6We shall now turn our attention to Calvinism as an evangelizing force. A very practical
test for any system of religious doctrine is, "Has it, in comparison with other systems,
proved itself a success in the evangelization of the world ?" To save sinners and convert
them to practical godliness is the chief purpose of the Church in this world; and the
system which will not measure up to this test must be set aside, no matter how popular it
may be in other respects.The first great Christian revival, in which three thousand people were converted,
occurred under the preaching of Peter in Jerusalem, who employed such language as this:
"Him being delivered up by the determinate council and foreknowledge of God, ye by
the hands of lawless men did crucify and slay," Acts 2:23. And the company of disciples,
when in earnest prayer shortly afterward, spoke in these words: "For of a truth in this city
against thy holy servant Jesus, whom thou didst anoint, both Herod and Pontius Pilate,
with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, were gathered together, to do whatsoever thy
hand and thy counsel foreordained to come to pass," Acts 4:27, 28. That is Calvinism
rigid enough.The next great revival in the Church, which occurred in the fourth century through the
influence of Augustine, was based on these doctrines, as is readily seen by anyone who
reads the literature on that period. The Reformation, which is admitted by all to have
been incomparably the greatest revival of true religion since New Testament times,
occurred under the soundly predestinarian preaching of Luther, Zwingli, and Calvin. To
Calvin and Admiral Coligny belongs the credit of having inspired the first Protestant
foreign missionary enterprise, the expedition to Brazil in 1555. True, the venture proved
unsuccessful, and the religious wars in Europe prevented the renewal of the enterprise for
a considerable period.McFetridge has given us some interesting and comparatively unknown facts about the
rise of the Methodist Church. Says he: "We speak of the Methodist Church beginning in
a revival. And so it did. But the first and chief actor in that revival was not Wesley, but
Whitefield (an uncompromising Calvinist). Though a younger man than Wesley, it was he
who first went forth preaching in the fields and gathering multitudes of followers, and
raising money and building chapels. It was Whitefield who invoked the two Wesleys to
his aid. And he had to employ much argument and persuasion to overcome their
prejudices against the movement. Whitefield began the great work at Bristol and
Kingswood, and had found thousands flocking to his side, ready to be organized into
churches, when he appealed to Wesley for assistance. Wesley, with all his zeal, had been
quite a High-Churchman in many of his views. He believed in immersing even the infants,
and demanded that dissenters should be rebaptized before being taken into the Church.
He could not think of preaching in any place but in a church. 'He should have thought,' as
he said, 'the saving of souls almost a sin if it had not been done in a church.' Hence when
Whitefield called on John Wesley to engage with him in the popular movement, he
shrank back. Finally, he yielded to Whitefield's persuasions, but, he allowed himself to
be governed in the decision by what many would rate as a superstition. He and Charles
first opened their Bibles at random to see if their eyes should fall on a text which might
decide them. But the texts were all foreign to the subject. Then he had recourse to
sortilege, and cast lots to decide the matter. The lot drawn was the one marked for him
to consent, and so he consented. Thus he was led to undertake the work with which his
name has been so intimately and honorably associated ever since."So largely was the Methodist movement owing to Whitefield that he was called 'the
Calvinistic establisher of Methodism,' and to the end of his life he remained the
representative of it in the eyes of the learned world. Walpole, in his Letters, speaks only
once of Wesley in connection with the rise of Methodism, while he frequently speaks of
Whitefield in connection with it. Mant, in his course of lectures against Methodism,
speaks of it as an entirely Calvinistic affair. Neither the mechanism nor the force which
gave rise to it originated with Wesley. Field-preaching, which gave the whole movement
its aggressive character, and fitted and enabled it to cope with the powerful agencies
which were armed against it, was begun by Whitefield, whilst 'Wesley was dragged into
it reluctantly.' In the polite language of the day 'Calvinism' and 'Methodism' were
synonymous terms, and the Methodists were called 'another sect of Presbyterians.' ...."It was Calvinism, and not Arminianism, which originated (so far as any system of
doctrine originated) the great religious movement in which the Methodist Church was
born."While, therefore, Wesley is to be honored for his work in behalf of that Church, we
should not fail to remember the great Calvinist, George Whitefield, who gave that Church
her first beginnings and her most distinctive character. Had he lived longer, and not
shrunk from the thought of being the founder of a Church, far different would have been
the results of his labors. As it was, he gathered congregations for others to form into
Churches, and built chapels for others to preach in."7It should also be said at this point that Wesley was a believer in witchcraft. Failure to
believe in witches was looked upon by him as a concession to infidels and rationalists.
Many of his biographers have passed over this subject in silence, although some of those
most friendly to his cause have admitted that he stated his beliefs in words which cannot
be misunderstood. In his Journal we read this report of a girl who was subject to fits:
"When old Doctor Alexander was asked what her disorder was, he answered, 'It is what
formerly they would have called being bewitched.' And why should they not call it so
now? Because the infidels have hooted witchcraft out of the world; and the complaisant
Christians, in large numbers, have joined them in the cry." Although Calvin lived two and
a quarter centuries before Wesley and had not the advantages of the scientific and
intellectual progress that had been made during that time, we find no such strange
credulity in him. His writings are not only free from witchcraft but contain numerous
warnings against such belief.The famous English Baptist Charles Hadden Spurgeon (1834-1892), one of the world's
greatest preachers, spoke as follows:"I am never ashamed to avow myself a Calvinist. I do not hesitate to take the name of
Baptist; but if I am asked what is my creed, I reply, 'It is Jesus Christ.'"And again, "Many of our Calvinistic preachers do not feed God's people. They believe
election, but they do not preach it. They think particular redemption true, but they lock it
in the chest of their creed, and never bring it out in their ministry. They hold final
perseverance, but they persevere in keeping quiet about it. They think there is such a
thing as effectual calling, but they do not think they are called frequently to preach it. The
great fault we find with them is, that they do not speak right out what they believe. You
could not know if you heard them fifty times what were the doctrines of the Gospel, or
what was their system of salvation. And hence God's people get starved."When we come to a study of foreign missions we find that this system of belief has been
the most important agency in carrying the Gospel to the heathen nations. St. Paul, whom
the more liberal opponents of Calvinism admit to have been responsible for the
Calvinistic cast of the theological thought of the Church, was the greatest and most
influential of missionaries. If we call the roll of the hemes of Protestant Missions we find
that almost without exception they have been disciples of Calvin. We find Carey and
Martyn in India, Linvingstone and Moffat in Africa, Morrison in China, Paton in the
South Seas, and a great host of others. These men professed and possessed a Calvinism
which was not static but dynamic; it was not their creed only, but their conduct.And in regard to foreign missions, Dr. F. W. Loetscher has said: "Though like all our
sister Churches we have reason, in view of our unprecedented resources and the
appalling needs of heathen lands, to lament that we have not accomplished more, we
may at least thank God that our venerated fathers made so good a beginning in
establishing missions all over the world; that the Calvinistic Churches today surpass all
others in their gifts to this cause; and in particular that our own denomination has the
unique honor and privilege of discharging her far-reaching responsibities by actually
confronting every one of the great non-Christian religions, and preaching the gospel on
more continents, and among more nations, peoples, and tongues, than any other
evangelical Church in the world."8Although to some it may sound like an unwarranted exaggeration, we have no hesitation
in saying that through the centuries Calvinism, fearlessly and ringingly polemic in its
insistence upon, and defense of, sound doctrine, has been the real strength of the
Christian Church. The traditionally high standards of the Calvinistic Churches in regard to
ministerial training and culture have borne a great harvest in bringing multitudes to the feet
of Jesus, not in temporary excitement, but in perpetual covenant. Judged by its fruits
Calvinism has proven itself incomparably the greatest evangelizing force in the world.The enemies of Calvinism are not able honestly to confront the testimony of history.
Certainly a glorious record belongs to this system in the history of modern civilization.
None more noble can be found anywhere. "It has ever been a mystery to the so-called
liberals," says Henry Ward Beecher, "that the Calvinists, with what they have considered
their harshly despotic and rigid views and doctrines, should always have been the
staunchest and bravest defenders of freedom. The working for liberty of these severe
principles in the minds of those that adopted them has been a puzzle. But the truth lies
here: Calvinism has done what no other religion has ever been able to do. It presents the
highest human ideal to the world, and sweeps the whole road to destruction with the
most appalling battery that can be imagined."It intensifies, beyond all example, the individuality of man, and shows in a clear and
overpowering light his responsibility to God and his relations to eternity. It points out man
as entering life under the weight of a tremendous responsibility, having on his march
toward the grave, this one sole solace — of securing heaven and of escaping hell."Thus the Calvinist sees man pressed, burdened, urged on, by the most mighty
influencing forces. He is on the march for eternity, and is soon to stand crowned in
heaven or to lie sweltering in hell, thus to continue for ever and ever. Who shall dare to
fetter such a being? Get out of his way ! Hinder him not, or do it at the peril of your own
soul. Leave him free to find his way to God. Meddle not with him or with his rights. Let
him work out his own salvation as he can. No hand must be laid crushingly upon a
creature who is on such a race as this — a race whose end is to be eternal glory or
unutterable woe for ever and ever."9"This tree," to adopt the eloquent paragraph of another, "may have, to prejudiced eyes, a
rough bark, a gnarled stem, and boughs twisted often into knotted shapes of ungraceful
strength. But, remember, it is not a willow-wand of yesterday. These boughs have
wrestled with the storms of a thousand years; this stem has been wreathed with the red
lightning and scarred by the thunderbolt; and all over its rough rind are the marks of the
battle-axe and the bullet. This old oak has not the pliant grace and silky softness of a
greenhouse plant, but it has a majesty above grace, and a grandeur beyond beauty. Its
roots may be strangely contorted, but some of them are rich with the blood of glorious
battlefields, some of them are clasped around the stakes of martyrs; some of them
hidden in solitary cells and lonely libraries, where deep thinkers have mused and prayed,
as in some apocalyptic Patmos; and its great tap-root runs back, until it twines in living
and loving embrace around the cross of Calvary. Its boughs may be gnarled, but they
hang clad with all that is richest and strongest in the civilization and Christianity of human
history."10As we survey this system we feel as one sitting at the manual of a great organ. Our
fingers touch the keys, as stop after stop opens of the swell, until the full chorus
responds, a grand harmony. Calvinism touches all the music of life because it seeks the
Creator first and above all and finds Him everywhere. Or again, we have been out upon
the deep, the great celestial dome overhead, the wide expanse of eternity all around our
souls and in and above all, there is GOD. Or again, we stand, as it were, at the rifting of
the rocks, with the landscape behind, the gorge before us, the mighty river of time
flowing forth out of and into eternity, the sun in its zenith overhead, all ablaze with light
and warmth, and in a whisper first, our souls have echoed back the words, "0 the depth
of the riches!" For Calvinism shows us God and traces His footsteps, — God, in all His
greatness, majesty, wisdom, holiness, justice, love. Calvinism shows us God high and
lifted up; and our souls cry out again, "What is man that THOU . . . art mindful of him?"This is no vain and empty eulogy of Calvinism. With the above facts and observations
every enlightened and impartial reader of history will agree. Furthermore, the author
would say of this book what Dr. E. W. Smith in his book, "The Creed of Presbyterians,"
said at the close of the chapter on, "The Creed Tested By Its Fruits," — namely that
these facts and observations are "set forth, not to stimulate denominational vanity, but to
fill us with gratitude to God for that past history and that present eminence which should
be to every one of us'A vantage-ground for nobleness';
and above all to kindle in our hearts a holy enthusiasm for that Divine system of truth,
which, under God, has been the foremost factor in the making of America and the
modern world."In conclusion we would say that in this book the reader has found some very
old-fashioned divinity — divinity as old as the Bible, as old and older than the world
itself, since this plan of redemption was hidden in the eternal counsels of God. No
attempt has been made to cloak the fact that the doctrines advocated and defended in
these pages are really wonderful and startling. They are enough to electrify the sleepy
sinner who has taken it for granted all his life long that he can square matters with God
any time he pleases, and they are sufficient to horrify the sleepy "saint" who has been
deluding himself in the deadening repose of a carnal religion. But why should they not
cause astonishment ? Does not nature teem with wonders ? Why should not revelation ?
One needs to read but little to become aware that Science brings to light many
astonishing truths which an uneducated man finds it hard, if not impossible, to believe;
and why should it not be so with the truths of Revelation and the spiritually uneducated ?
If the Gospel does not startle and terrify and amaze a man when presented to him, it is
not the true Gospel. But who was ever amazed at Arminianism with its doctrine that
every man carves out his own destiny? It will not suffice merely to ignore or ridicule these
doctrines as many are inclined to do. The question is, Are these doctrines true? If they
are true, why ridicule them? If they are not true, disprove them. We close with the
statement that this great system of religious thought which bears Calvin's name is nothing
more or less than the hope of the world.
Footnotes:
1The Creed of Presbyterians, p. vii.
2The Creed of Presbyterians, p. 74.
3Calvinism in History, p. 113.
4Presbyterians and the Revolution, p. 140.
5Calvinism. p. 78
6Calvinism, p. 8.
7Calvinism in History, pp. 151-153.
8Address before the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., 1929.
9Plymouth Pulpit, article, Calvinism.
10Power and Claims of a Calvinistic Literature, p. 35, quoted from Smith, The Creed of
Presbyterians, p. 105.