CALVINISM IN ENGLAND A glance at English history readily shows us that it was Calvinism which made
Protestantism triumphant in that land. Many of the leading Protestants who fled to
Geneva during the reign of Queen Mary afterward obtained high positions in the Church
under Queen Elizabeth. Among them were the translators of the Geneva version of the
Bible, which owes much to Calvin and Beza, and which continued to be the most
popular English version till the middle of the seventeenth century when it was superseded
by the King James version. The influence of Calvin is shown in the Thirty-Nine Articles
of the Church of England, especially in Article XVII which states the doctrine of
Predestination. Cunningham has shown that all of the great theologians of the Established
Church during the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI and Elizabeth were thorough-going
predestinarians and that the Arminianism of Laud and his successors was a deviation
from that orginal position.If we search for the true heroes of England, we shall find them in that noble body of
English Calvinists whose insistence upon a purer form of worship and a purer life won for
them the nickname, "Puritans," to whom Macaulay refers as "perhaps the most
remarkable body of men which the world has ever produced." "That the English people
became Protestant," says Bancroft, "is due to the Puritans." Smith tells us: "The
significance of this fact is beyond computation. English Protestantism, with its open Bible,
its spiritual and intellectual freedom, meant the Protestantism not only of the American
colonies, but of the virile and multiplying race which for three centuries has been carrying
the Anglo-Saxon language, religion, and institutions into all the world.1Cromwell, the great Calvinistic leader and commoner, planted himself upon the solid
rock of Calvinism and called to himself soldiers who had planted themselves upon that
same rock. The result was an army which for purity and heroism surpassed anything the
world had ever seen. "It never found," says Macaulay, "either in the British Isles or on
the Continent, an enemy who could stand its onset. In England, Scotland, Ireland,
Flanders, the Puritan warriors, often surrounded by difficulties, sometimes contending
against threefold odds, not only never failed to conquer, but never failed to destroy and
break in pieces whatever force was opposed to them. They at length came to regard the
day of battle as a day of certain triumph, and marched against the most renowned
battalions of Europe with disdainful confidence. Even the banished Cavaliers felt an
emotion of national pride when they saw a brigade of their countrymen, outnumbered by
foes and abandoned by friends, drive before it in headlong rout the finest infantry of
Spain, and force a passage into a counterscarp which had just been pronounced
impregnable by the ablest of the marshals of France." And again, "That which chiefly
distinguished the army of Cromwell from other armies, was the austere morality and the
fear of God which pervaded the ranks. It is acknowledged by the most zealous Royalists
that, in that singular camp, no oath was heard, no drunkenness or gambling was seen,
and that, during the long dominion of soldiery, the property of the peaceable citizens and
the honor of woman were held sacred. No servant girl complained of the rough gallantry
of the redcoats. Not an ounce of plate was taken from the shops of the goldsmiths"2Prof. John Fiske, who has been ranked as one of the two greatest American historians,
says, "It is not too much to say that in the seventeenth century the entire political future
of mankind was staked upon the questions that were at issue in England. Had it not been
for the Puritans, political liberty would probably have disappeared from the world. If
ever there were men who laid down their lives in the cause of all mankind, it was those
grim old Ironsides, whose watch-words were texts of Holy Writ, whose battle-cries
were hymns of praise."3When Protestant martyrs died in the valleys of Piedmont, and the papal autocrat sat on
his throne in luxury, gathering his blood-stained garments around him, it was Cromwell,
the Puritan, supported by a council and nation of the same persuasion, who wrote
demanding that these persecutions cease.On three different occasions Cromwell was offered, and was urged to accept, the
Crown of England, but each time he refused. Doctrinally we find that the Puritans were
the literal and lineal descendants of John Calvin; and they and they alone kept alive the
precious spark of English liberty. In view of these facts no one can rashly deny the justice
of Fiske's conclusion that "It would be hard to over-rate the debt which mankind owes
to John Calvin."McFetridge in his splendid little book, "Calvinism in History," says, "If we ask again,
Who brought the final great deliverance to English liberty? we are answered by history,
The Illustrious Calvinist, William, Prince of Orange, who, as Macaulay says, found in the
strong and sharp logic of the Geneva school something that suited his intellect and his
temper; the keystone of whose religion was the doctrine of Predestination; and who, with
his keen logical vision, declared that if he were to abandon the doctrine of Predestination
he must abandon with it all his belief in a superintending Providence, and must become a
mere Epicurean. And he was right, for Predestination and an overruling Providence are
one and the same thing. If we accept the one, we are in consistency bound to accept the
other," (p. 52).Footnotes:
1The Creed of Presbyterians, p. 72.
2Maeaulay, History of England, I., p. 119.
3The Beginnings of New England, pp. 37, 51.