ICBH - Suez
1956
Institute of Contemporary
British
History, Suez
1956:
a consumer's guide to papers at the Public Record
Office
quote " .......The opening on January 1 this
year of British Government records for 1956 has generated the expected
surge of interest amongst researchers at the Public Record Office. The
Suez records were always going to be something of a test case for the
working of the Public Records Act of 1967 and most of the pundits at Kew
have been agreeably surprised by the volume of material released, while
having some reservations about the quality of some of the material and
being dismayed by the usual profusion of retained
documents.
More than most years, the 1987 vintage is a
rather patchy one, being studded with anomalies. In some cases the
departments have released material from 1957 under the provisions of
Section 5 of the Public Records Act 1958 to enable researchers to build
up as broad a picture as possible. In the light of this accommodating
attitude it is therefore surprising that some of the Cabinet committees'
papers for 1956 have not been released because they were bound with
those of 1957, the reason being that for convenience the records of the
Eden premiership were The general and political correspondence of the Foreign Of fice will, as usual, be one of the major research tools, and this year has brought something of a bonus in the release of some 30 Permanent Under Secretary's Department 'Z' files; however, the 74 United States files and 69 French files do look rather sparse when compared to previous years' releases. When working in the Suez records for 1956 it is even more important than usual to be aware of the implications of the restricted circulation of documents. Not only did the military papers have the special 'Terrapin' (code for restricted) circulation but diplomatic material was also given a restricted 'Suez' circulation both within the Foreign Of fice and for outside bodies. The most extreme example of this is of course the celebrated issue of collusion with Israel: given the tight circle of people within which this secret was held, it is scarcely surprising that there is no reference to collusion in Foreign Office records until during and after MUSKETEER. The military records also have little to say directly on the question of cooperation with Israel until the first days of the MUSKETEER operation. Researchers can therefore only echo the frustration of the Foreign Office officials on this matter. The records of the full Cabinet in CAB 128 and
129 are not that significant for the Suez crisis, except to establish
how much the Cabinet was told of the negotiations with the French and
Israelis in Paris in October 1956. Similarly the Defence Committee,
whose records are not yet available at the PRO, was not directly
involved in the Suez affair and its records, while containing useful
background material on the importance of the available), is retained under Section 3(4) of the 1958 Act. As the Cabinet and Defence Committee were to all intents and purposes shortcircuited out of the decision - making process, the Suez crisis in all its aspects was handled by what has been called an 'inner cabinet' - the standing Egypt Committee. The records of this body, contained in CAB 134/1216 and 1217, are therefore the starting point for any research on the Suez crisis. This ministerial committee performed the vital coordinating and decisionmaking function in all areas of policy from the nationalisation of the Canal to the launching of MUSKETEER. These files therefore contain essential material on diplomatic, financial and military activity: unfortunately, these do peter out alarmingly in October 1956. The Egypt Committee was serviced by a web of other committees. Its subcommittee, the Egypt (Official) Committee in CAB 134/1225, contains intriguing material on political directives and civil affairs arrangements for MUSKETEER. The Middle East (Official) Committee, whose records have not yet been fully released except for memoranda up to August 1956 available in CAB 134/1298, seems to have dealt not only with questions relating to the Aswan Dam but also with the complex negotiations on SCUA and its forerunners. The Defence (Transition) Committee (CAB 134/&15), whose remit included the mobilisation and administration of the MUSKETEER forces, also reported to the Egypt Committee. In addition to this cluster of committees which formed the nerve centre of the British machinery for the Suez crisis, the CAB series also contains the Miscellaneous and General series of ad hoc meetings of which the following are relevant for the Middle East: CAB 130/111 (Middle East Affairs November
1956); African Department
Economic Relations
Levant Department
Northern Department
One of the mainstays for research on postwar
diplomatic history are normally the Cabinet Secretariat files in CAB 21
which are invaluable for tracing the evolution of decisions. However,
the CAB 21 series for the Suez crisis is rather sparse. To an extent
this can be remedied by the use of the PREM 11 series: by their very
nature and because of the personal control exercised by Eden over all
aspects of the Suez crisis, these provide an additional insight into the highest echelons of
decision making in Whitehall. These voluminous files mix the invaluable
with the inconsequential. Of particular significance are the
following:
These selected files contain telegrams and memoranda covering such subjects as the immediate reaction to the nationalisation of the Canal, the proposed military response and continued military planning, and Anglo - French, Anglo - American and Anglo - Soviet relations. These personal papers of the Prime Minister
are parallelled by those of the Foreign Secretary, Selwyn Lloyd,
contained in FO 800. Apart from containing his diary of engagements,
miscellaneous correspondence and speeches, this class also
contains Perhaps the single most important file is FO 800/726 which contains the correspondence between Dulles and Lloyd in the August to November period. To some extent these files duplicate material available in FO 371 (general and political correspondence) which for any researcher will form the backbone for work on the Suez crisis: however, these files have to be treated with some care as on several key issues the Foreign Office was not kept informed. The telegrams, minutes and memoranda, briefing documents and position papers preserved in this class form a day - to - day account of the diplomatic activity of Britain in 1956 and therefore portray the concerns of Whitehall. In a short piece such as this it is not possible to do justice to this class but the files in Table 1 are the most important, although others omitted should not be dismissed out of hand. These FO 371 files should be supplemented where necessary with other FO classes such as FO 115 (Embassy and Consular archives Washington) to overcome the lack of material in some key areas: FO 115/4545 and 4548 - 4551 provide the only detailed files on Anglo - American relations in 1956. FO 115/4552 - 4608 also contains useful material on the Suez Canal and the United Nations. Unfortunately, material for other embassies, such as Paris, Jedda and Cairo, are not available; some were destroyed in the 1956 evacuation and others later because of duplication with the main FO 371 sequence. For any researcher interested in the significant area of British information, cultural and propaganda work in the Middle East, FO 953 (records of the Information Policy Department) looks potentially fruitful. Other civil departments such as the Colonial Of fice and the Commonwealth Office had less influence on the handling of the Suez crisis and these records are therefore not very helpful. The exception is a series of files in DO 35 which chronicle the response of the Commonwealth to the evolving Suez crisis; 6334 and 6337 - 6341 provide material on all the Commonwealth countries with the exception of Australia. DO 35/6314 - 6322 contains material relating to interdepartmental cooperation during the summer and autumn of 1956. Of the financial and supply departments the most important is the Treasury, by virtue of its position and Macmillan's membership of the inner cabinet. The most important files dealing with the financial aspect of the dispute are T 236/4188 - 4190, which concern the run on sterling, and T236/4614 and 4635 which concern financial pressure brought to bear on the Nasser regime as a preliminary to the military option. The evolution of MUSKETEER, the deployment of forces, the launching of the_operation and its military consequences can to some degree be found in the files of the civilian departments and committees. The Egypt Committee, as the overseeing body, contains some useful material, while the following FO 371 files are also concerned with military planning and the military action: In addition there are various files in the Africa and Levant Departments concerned with the supply of arms to the Middle East and the possible application of the Tripartite Declaration of 1950 in 1956. However, for a comprehensive picture of the military aspects of the Suez affair it is necessary to go to the Ministry of Defence and the Service Department files. Taken together these form a coherent body of material that rivals FO 371 as a source for any study of the events of 1956. It would be a great mistake to ignore the AIR, ADM and WO classes in the mistaken belief that these deal with 'pay and rations' alone. Several classes are essential for any study of the operational side of MUSKETEER ADM
116
AIR
20
WO
288 However, the Chiefs of Staff and Joint Planning Staff machinery is of central importance: DEFE 4 (COS meetings), DEFE 5 (COS papers) and DEFE 6 (JPS papers) provide the records for the most important military body that held an overseeing role for the MUSKETEER operation and its likely consequences. These should as far as possible be read together; although papers are often attached to the COS meetings, it is worth cross - checking with the papers in DEFE 5 and DEFE 6 to be able to trace the evolution of a particular paper. As usual what is lacking are the Secretarial minutes, which are occasionally very important documents and do not seem to be preserved, and the minutes of the Staff Conferences with the Minister of Defence...... The DEFE history
records
AIR 8
WO
106
WO
216
|
You are my today's
Web guest
Thank you for your visit
© 2007 Yahia Al Shaer. All rights reserved.
This web site is maintained by
ICCT, Internet Computer Consulting & Training, Germany, USA, UK
Specialized in multilingual "Arabic, English, German and French" Internet applications, Home-pages and Web-sites, design implementation, consulting and training.