The Los Angeles
Riots: Lessons for the Urban Future,
Book by Mark Baldassare; Westview Press, 1994
1 Introduction
Mark Baldassare
Why study the
Los Angeles riots? There are several reasons for this inquiry into the April
1992 violence and unrest that occurred after a jury acquitted the police
officers who were accused of using excessive force in the Rodney King beating.
First, the Los Angeles riots are among the most violent, destructive and
frightening episodes in twentieth century American urban history. Next, the Los
Angeles riots have been regarded by some observers as a sign of a dangerous
turning point in the history of U.S. cities. Lastly, many have said that there
are lessons to be learned from the events that took place in Los Angeles for
improving policies toward U.S. cities.
When I began
this search for knowledge more than a year ago, however, there were few
publications dedicated to increasing understanding of this important urban
event (see for example GoodingWilliams , 1993; Hazen, 1992; Los Angeles
Times, 1992). By contrast, the 1965 Watts riot has been reviewed, analyzed
and interpreted in many places ( Cohen, 1970; Cohen and Murphy, 1966; Crump,
1966; Fogelson, 1969; Oberschall, 1968; Sears and McConahay, 1973). What I
discovered instead were recent studies that had not yet found their way into
print, and scholars whose expertise made it possible for them to offer unique
analyses of the riots. My task, then, was to organize and integrate new works
by several authors into a collection of essays.
This book
represents the first, comprehensive study of the Los Angeles riots. It is an
edited volume of original works by urban scholars seeking to answer these basic
questions: what were the causes of the Los Angeles riots, what actually took
place, and what are the consequences of the riots for Los Angeles and other
U.S. cities? The authors also offer suggestions for avoiding future unrest
similar in size
2 A Riot
of Color: The Demographic Setting
Peter A.
Morrison and Ira S. Lowry
When the police
officers who beat Rodney King were exonerated by a predominantly white suburban
jury on April 29, 1992, street corner disturbances immediately erupted in two
black neighborhoods of South Central Los Angeles. Within a few hours, these
disturbances escalated into a three-day riot that damaged people and property
over an area of almost 60 square miles. Since then, these three days of mob
violence, arson, and looting in Los Angeles have usually been represented in
the press and other public forums as a political protest by blacks against
manifest injustice to a fellow black, brutally mistreated, by white police
officers. However, a careful look at the sequence of events and the actual
participants in terms of race and ethnicity suggests that this view greatly
oversimplifies and misrepresents the civil tensions that erupted on April 29,
1992. Although whites who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time
were harassed and beaten, the truly systematic targets of violence were retail
establishments, ranging from neighborhood convenience stores to discount houses
and supermarkets; Korean shopkeepers were especially at risk. And over half of
those arrested by the Los Angeles police during six days of civil disturbance
were Hispanic, not black.
2 A Riot
of Color: The Demographic Setting
Peter A.
Morrison and Ira S. Lowry
When the police
officers who beat Rodney King were exonerated by a predominantly white suburban
jury on April 29, 1992, street corner disturbances immediately erupted in two
black neighborhoods of South Central Los Angeles. Within a few hours, these
disturbances escalated into a three-day riot that damaged people and property
over an area of almost 60 square miles. Since then, these three days of mob
violence, arson, and looting in Los Angeles have usually been represented in
the press and other public forums as a political protest by blacks against
manifest injustice to a fellow black, brutally mistreated, by white police
officers. However, a careful look at the sequence of events and the actual
participants in terms of race and ethnicity suggests that this view greatly
oversimplifies and misrepresents the civil tensions that erupted on April 29,
1992. Although whites who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time
were harassed and beaten, the truly systematic targets of violence were retail
establishments, ranging from neighborhood convenience stores to discount houses
and supermarkets; Korean shopkeepers were especially at risk. And over half of
those arrested by the Los Angeles police during six days of civil disturbance
were Hispanic, not black.
3 Los
Angeles Coalition Politics
Raphael J.
Sonenshein
When an amateur
cameraman captured Los Angeles police officers beating black motorist Rodney
King on March 3, 1991, remarkable events unfolded within Los Angeles politics.
The seemingly unassailable police department faced mounting calls to reform its
practices. Within two years, a large group of the city's political leaders had
left office, to be replaced by very different people. The most dramatic changes
were the election of a new Republican mayor after twenty years of Democrat Tom
Bradley's dominance, and the selection of an outside police chief to lead the
previously closed LAPD. These surprising political developments were all
influenced by the beating of Rodney King and the civil unrest of 1992.
The politics
of the Rodney King case and of the urban violence that grew out of it provide
an extraordinary window into the evolving coalition politics of Los Angeles. My
research uncovered the historical evolution of an extraordinary biracial
coalition led by black mayor Tom Bradley, linking African-Americans and liberal
whites, particularly Jews ( Sonenshein 1989; 1993a). The development of a
strong biracial coalition in Los Angeles challenged the dominant pessimism on
interracial politics and required an expansion of models based on midwestern
and eastern cities ( Sonenshein 1989). Indeed, the rise of the Bradley
coalition and its later difficulties helped explain the failure of biracial
politics in New York City ( Sonenshein 1990).
In New York
City, there was a conflict of interest between blacks and white liberals and
interracial leadership networks were poorly developed. The situation was quite
the opposite in Los Angeles. Before the rise of the liberal coalition, blacks
and white liberals were both political outsiders and their shared political
interests complemented
4 The
Rodney King Beating Verdicts
Hiroshi
Fukurai, Richard Krooth, and Edgar W. Butler
As a landmark
in the recent history of law enforcement and jury trials, the Rodney King
beating trials are historically comparable to the 1931 Scottsboro case (Norris
v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587, 1935) or the 1968 Huey Newton case ( Newton v.
California, 8 Cal App 3d 359, 87 Cal Rptr 394, 1970). The King beating
cases are also similar to Florida trials that led to three urban riots and
rebellion during 1980s in Miami, Florida in which police officers were
acquitted of criminal charges in the death of three blacks: Arthur McDuffie in
1980, Nevell Johnson in 1982, and Clement Anthony Lloyd in 1989. The 1980
McDuffie riots, for instance, resulted in eighteen deaths and eighty million
dollars in property damage (Barry v. Garcia, 573 So.2d 932 933, 1991).
An all white jury acquitted police officers of all criminal charges in the face
of compelling evidence against them, including the testimony of the chief
medical officer who said that McDuffie's head injuries were the worst he had
seen in 3,600 autopsies ( Crewdson, 1980). The verdict triggered violence
because it symbolized the continuation of racial inequities in the criminal
justice and court system.
Similarly, in
the King beating trial and jury verdict which was rightly called
"sickening" by then-President Bush and condemned by all segments of
society, the King embroglio also provides an opportunity for evaluation and
reform of police procedures, law enforcement structures, and jury trials.
In the first
state trial, on April 29, 1992, a predominantly white jury had tried and
exonerated four Los Angeles white police officers on assault charges for the
beating of a black motorist. This was both despite and due to visual court
evidence of the continuous beating of King by police officers, images that had
been captured on videotape by a resident of a nearby apartment. The acquittal
by the predominantly
5 Public
Opinion Before and After a Spring of Discontent 1 <53256979>
Lawrence Bobo,
Camille L. Zubrinsky, James H. Johnson, Jr., and Melvin L. Oliver,
Yet to
do all of these things and spend the sums involved will all be for naught
unless the conscience of the community, the white and the Negro community
together, directs a new and, we believe, revolutionary attitude toward the
problems of our city.
-- The
McCone Commission, 1965
This
alternative will require a commitment to national action -- compassionate,
massive and sustained, backed by the resources of the most powerful and the
richest nation on this earth. From every American it will require new
attitudes, new understanding, and, above all, new will.
-- The
Kerner Commission, 1968
Can we
all get along?
--
Rodney King, 1992
The Los Angeles
rebellion of 1992 differed from its predecessors of the 1960s and 1980s not
merely in terms of the magnitude of the devastation and the level of the
emergency response needed to quell the civil unrest, but in several other
important respects ( Johnson et al. 1992). 2 <53256979>
First, the
participants in the civil unrest represented a range of ethnic groups. For
example, more Latinos were arrested and killed than were blacks.
Second, the
violence had a much more systematic quality and was targeted at another ethnic
minority: Korean entrepreneurs.
Third, events
in Los Angeles ignited deep and powerful grievancesacross the nation. Many
cities, some with quite small minority populations (e.g., Omaha and
Minneapolis), experienced large scale protests and violence.Fourth, the
rebellion was conveyed to the rest of nation and the world with unparalleled
speed and often in shockingly...
6 A
Profile of Those Arrested
Joan Petersilia
and Allan Abrahamse
The riot 1 <53256996>that
took place in Los Angeles between Wednesday, April 29, 1992 and Monday, May 5,
1992 was sparked by the acquittal by an all-white jury of four white police
officers charged with the 1991 beating of black motorist Rodney King. Other
recent events in Los Angeles add to the impression that the riot was an
instance of racial conflict-for example, a Korean grocer had recently shot and
killed a black teenager but was given a probationary sentence instead of a
prison term by a white judge. And in an eerie and perverse parallel, the
televised images of the Rodney King beating were reflected in the televised
images of a white truck driver, Reginald Denny, being beaten almost to death by
blacks in the early hours of the riot. Moreover, memories of the "Watts
Riots" of 1965 remain fresh in the minds of many, and in 1965 the area
known as Watts was mostly black and the images that survive involve black
rioters battling white policeman. All these facts contribute to an initial
impression that the 1992 Los Angeles riot was a race riot-a conflict between
races.
But while there
can be little doubt that the anger felt by black people concerning the Rodney
King verdict provided the spark that started the riot, there is considerable
evidence that by the next day, April 30, the riot had spread well beyond the
bounds of race. Plainly, it was not the case that only black people were
rioting; television coverage of looting plainly showed non-black persons
engaged in looting. Many of these non-black persons appeared to be Latinos.
But, of course, television images provide only anecdotal evidence, at best.
Another
critical theme raised early, and still a subject of vigorous investigation and
debate, was the alleged lack of police response in the early stages of the
riot. This allegation is supported, though hardly proved, by the searing
television image mentioned above of the beating
7 Property
Damage and Violence: A Collective Behavior Analysis
Kathleen J.
Tierney
The Los Angeles
unrest is widely considered to be the most serious episode of race-related
crowd violence in the U. S. in this century. In the aftermath of the
disturbance, the city continues to face major challenges related to community
recovery and reconciliation.
In many
respects, the unrest was almost a textbook case, the prototypical big-city
riot, resembling episodes of collective violence that occurred in Washington,
D. C., Detroit, Newark, and scores of other U. S. cities during the 1960s. Like
many of these earlier racial disturbances, including the 1965 Watts riot, the
1992 unrest was triggered by an event that highlighted conflicts between a
minority community and the law enforcement /justice system (see National
Advisory Committee on Civil Disorders 1968 for a discussion of common features
of these earlier riots). The unrest also closely resembles the 1980 Miami riot,
which followed the acquittal of police officers in the killing of Arthur
McDuffie, a black man. That case also involved a change of venue -- to Tampa.
The jury, which was all white and all male, discounted the testimony of
eyewitnesses, including police officers, who testified that McDuffie had been
beaten to death by police following a high-speed chase. (For accounts of the
origins and dynamics of this collective violence episode, see Ladner et al.
1981 and Porter and Dunn, 1984.)
As was the case
with the riots of the 1960s, including Watts, and like Miami in 1980, the 1992
Los Angeles unrest was initiated within the minority community by local
residents, and the looting and burning of business establishments were the
major forms of property crime. And like these earlier episodes, most of the
people killed in the unrest were black.
8 Black-Korean
Conflict
Regina Freer
The startling
video-taped shooting of a young African American woman by a Korean American
grocer; the portrayal of contentious relations between an African American
customer and a Korean American merchant in Spike Lee "Do The Right
Thing"; and the sight of Korean American merchants in predominantly
African American neighborhoods desperately attempting to defend their stores
with guns during the recent Los Angeles rebellion are all images which served
to bring the long-standing conflict between the members of the African American
and Korean American communities into the nation's consciousness. Such conflict
is an unfortunate reality in this nation's cities. Urban residents who
simultaneously cope with decreasing federal funds for cities and a nationwide
economic downturn are also coping with the challenges engendered by increasing
diversity and population growth. Cultural misunderstanding, coupled with the
perception and reality of competition for scarce resources, unfortunately
ensures that the path leading to conflict is the one most frequently travelled.
As reflected in the aforementioned images, a recent example of such explosive
conflict is the flaring of tensions between African American customers and
Korean American merchants in Los Angeles before and during the recent
rebellion. On the heels of the shootings of two African Americans by Korean
American merchants, leaders in the black community organized boycotts of
selected Korean American-owned stores. Tensions flared on all sides of the
conflict; one such boycott lasted for more than 90 days, eventually shutting
down the store. While this conflict can be and has been painted simply as an
example of cultural misunderstanding, I believe that it is far more complex and
multifaceted. While cultural insensitivity and ignorance do play a significant
role in the conflict, it is important to view this conflict in the context of
the economic disparity and racism which stretch well beyond the interaction of
these two groups alone.I argue that this conflict has a fundamentally economic
root cause and that it is
9 Community
Coalition-Building
James A.
Regalado
Mayoral Race
1993 brought the "City of Angels" a public leader whose
private-sector background and leadership style are consistent with the business
regime model of local governance associated more with Dallas, Texas ( Elkin
1987) and Los Angeles in the first five decades of this century ( Sonenshein
1993), than with Los Angeles over the last thirty years. Is a moderate to
conservative Republican, a successful business leader and consummate insider on
the city's governing coalition in the city's "Bradley years," truly
"tough enough to turn L.A. around?" Richard Riordan's campaign theme
has been commonly interpreted as the new mayor's recipe for preventing another
riot while symbolically assuring a more tranquil existence for the city's
middle and upper class voters. This would largely occur through placing 3,000
more cops on the beat while promoting ordinances that may be seen as further
"gating" communities of color. The Riordan administration has
proposed funding this "vision" through the selling of city assets
(like LAX), contracting out city services and jobs to private bidders, and the
anticipated largess of President Clinton's anti-crime urban agenda. Is this the
tone-setting and tonic needed by a city whose various communities and groups
are seemingly more at war with each other than in ongoing critical
introspection and dialogue? Not according to L.A. writer Mike Davis (author of City
of Quartz), who has contended that the city has learned little from the
fires of Spring 1992, if the election of Richard Riordan as mayor is any
indication ( Mendez 1993).
Judging by
Riordan's appointments to his inner-circle of Deputy Mayors and advisors as
well as to Commissions and Departments running the city, the city's public
leadership is becoming more class and race exclusive than it has been in the
past twenty years ( Connell
10 Urban
Rioting in Los Angeles: A Comparison of 1965 with 1992
David O. Sears
The
nation is rapidly moving toward two increasingly separate Americas. Within two
decades, this division could be so deep that it would be almost impossible to
unite: a white society principally located in suburbs, in smaller central
cities, and in the peripheral parts of large central cities, and a Negro
society largely concentrated within large central cities.
--
Kerner Commission ( 1968, p. 407).
I read
[the] report. . . . of the 1919 riot in Chicago, and it as if I were reading
the report of the investigating committee on the Harlem riot of '35, the report
of the investigating committee on the Harlem riot of '43, the report of the
McCone Commission on the Watts riot. I must again in candor say to you members
of this Commission -- it is a kind of Alice in Wonderland -- with the same
moving picture re-shown over and over again, the same analysis, the same
recommendations, and the same inaction.
--
Kenneth B. Clark (In Kerner Commission report, 1968, p. 29).
Many
commentators have referred to the police brutality verdict and rebellion as a
strong 'wake-up call'. . . . Sadly, our data provide no substantial indication
that this 'wake up call' has been heard.
-- Bobo
et al. (Chapter 5). Can we all get along? -- Rodney King, 1992
At 7 PM on
August 11, 1965,a black man, Marquette Frye, having had several
"screwdrivers" celebrating his brother's return to Los Angeles from
military service, was weaving his way home down the freeway at a speed
exceeding the legal limit. A motorcycle officer ofthe California Highway Patrol
pulled him over at 166th Street and Avalon Boulevard, in the heart of the Los
Angeles neighborhood known as "Watts." Frye's behavior was somewhat
boisterous, though humorous and cooperative, but it attracted a crowd on a...
About the Book and Editor
The Los Angeles
riots in the Spring of 1992 were among the most violent and destructive events
in twentieth-century urban America. This collection of original essays by
leading urban experts offers the first comprehensive analysis of the unrest that
took place after a jury acquitted the police officers who were accused of using
excessive force in the Rodney King beating.
This book
addresses three questions: What were the causes of the Los Angeles riots, what
actually took place, and what are the consequences and meaning of the riots for
U.S. cities? The findings presented throughout this volume provide strong
evidence that the existence of an inner-city "underclass," the
persistence of black-white tensions in U.S. society, and the emergence of inter-ethnic
hostilities in urban neighborhoods are critical to understanding the Los
Angeles riots and their implications.
While sounding an urgent warning signal to the governments and citizens of other U.S. cities, The Los Angeles Riots presents solutions and policy recommendations for avoiding a repeat of such unrest in the future. The book is crucial to everyone's understanding of the contemporary urban environment and will be ideal as a supplementary text in urban politics, sociology, and urban planning and policy courses as well as in current affairs.