Public Debt
Public debt refers to borrowing by a government from within the country or from abroad, from private individuals or association of individuals or from banking and NBFIs.
(a) Internal and External: When a state finds that it is not possible to obtain further money by taxation, it resorts to borrowing from citizens and financial institutions within the country. This is ‘internal borrowing’. The state may accumulate funds by raising short-term loans or long-term loans or by both. If the state is passing through a very critical period, then it can borrow all the money which the nation saves. In that case trade and industry will suffer a lot because no money is left to finance them. In the normal period, however, the state can borrow only surplus funds which are left with the businessmen after meeting all the needs of the business.
External loan is that which is raised from international money markets, foreign governments, and from international agencies like International Monetary Fund. When a state is in need of money, it tries to get as much loan as it can from other states. The foreign governments do not advance loans without a limit. They minutely study the budgetary position of the borrowing country, the tax-bearing capacity of the nation, the per-capita income of the people and the purpose for which the loan is desired. If the position of the budget is sound and the taxable capacity of the nation is high, then a foreign government may advance sizable loan to the borrowing country.
(b) Productive and Unproductive: The debt that is expected to create assets which will yield income sufficient to pay the principal amount and the interest on it, is known as ‘productive debt’. In other words, they are expected pay their way; they are self-liquidating. J.L. Hanson has referred such a debt as ‘reproductive debt’.
On the other hand, unproductive debt is the debt that is raised for financing unproductive assets or heavy unproductive expenditures. Such a debt is a deadweight debt. Debt invested on wars or prevention of war is a deadweight debt.
(c) Short-term and Long-term: The loans that are repayable within a period of one year, they are termed as ‘short-term loans’ and if they are taken for more than one year, they are referred to as ‘long-term loans’. Following are the reasons for raising short-term loans:
1. If, at any time, the expenditure of the government exceeds the revenue, then she takes recourse to short-term borrowing.
2. If, at any time, the rate of interest in the market is very high and the government is in need of large fund to finance her various projects, then it raises loan for a short-period of time only and waits till the prevailing high rate of interest comes down.
3. The commercial banks find a very safe and profitable opportunity to invest their surplus funds in the government short-term loans.
If the government is in need of large funds and the short-term loans are not enough, then she takes recourse to long-term borrowing. Long-term loans entail following advantages:
1. Long-term loan provides an opportunity to the state in undertaking large projects like construction of canals, hydroelectric projects, buildings, highways, etc. As these loans are not to be repaid at a short notice, so the government safely spends them on productive projects.
2. Long-term loans are also unavoidable for strengthening country’s defence.
3. Long-term loans provide good opportunity for commercial banks and insurance companies to invest their surplus funds. As the rate of interest on long-term loans is higher than on the short-term loans.
4. Long-term loans can be repaid by the government by the time which is favourable or convenient to her. She can also convert these loans at a lower rate of interest later on.
5. If at any time, the rate of interest is low, the government can contract a long-term loan and with the amount thus raised some public work programmes at lower cost.
1. War or war-preparedness, including nuclear programmes
2. To cover the budget deficits on current account
3. To undertake public welfare schemes
4. Urge for economic growth
5. Inefficiencies of public organisations and corruption
If the debt is taken for productive purposes, for e.g., for irrigation, transportation, railway, roads, information technology, human skill development, etc., it will not mean any burden. Infact, they will confer a benefit. But if the debt is unproductive it will impose both money burden and real burden on the economy.
(a) Burden of internal debt: Internal debt involves a series of transfers of wealth within the country, i.e., from lender to government and then later on at the time of redemption from government to lender. Money is thus transferred from one section of the community to other sections. In this case the money burden on the economy is zero.
But there may be real burden on the community. In order to repay the interest and the principal amount of the debt, the government has to levy taxes. What the taxpayers pay the lenders receive. The lenders are generally rich people and tax burden is fall on poor especially in the case of indirect taxes. The net result may be that the wealth is transferred from poor to rich. This is the loss of economic welfare.
(b) Burden of external debt: External debt also involves a series of transfer of wealth from the foreign lender to the borrowing country, and when it is repaid the transfer is in the opposite direction. As the borrowing country paid interest to the foreign lenders, a direct money burden is fall on the whole community.
The community is also suffered from real burden of external debts. Government has to cover the amount of interest to be paid to the foreign lender by heavily taxing the income of the community. As a result the production, consumption and distribution of income is badly affected. Moreover, the foreign lender has direct involvement in the economic activities of the country.
Effects of Public Debt on Production, Consumption, Distribution and Level of Income and Employment
J.L. Hanson has classified public debt into four main classes: