An event took place in 1991 which suddenly threatened to destroy a thousand years of choral history: Salisbury,
one of our greatest medieval cathedrals, established a separate girls' choir. Others rushed to follow suit.
These moves appear to many both timely and just. How can we deny girls such a wonderful experience? After
all, they argue, if women can now be admitted to the Anglican priesthood, it is wrong to expect girls to accept
their lot in silence.
However laudible, in principle, a policy of 'equal opportunities' is likely to have a disastrous effect on our
choral tradition. "Democracy," wrote C.S. Lewis, "is all very well as a political device. It must not
intrude into the spiritual, or even the aesthetic, world." Let us also remember that nature knows nothing of
equal opportunity. A few fleeting years as a treble are all a boy can hope for. By contrast, just when he
is ready to leave the choir, the girl chorister is at last getting into her stride. Why should she not continue
singing? Indeed, she may claim a right to do so.
Many cathedrals aim to share the sung services equally between the boys and the girls. Such a reduction in
performance by the boys will inevitably lead to lowered standards. The all-male tradition is also likely to be
challenged by women anxious to sing in cathedrals. When these things happen, pressures to merge the
choirs will be irresistible -- the final inducement coming from the financial savings to be made. However, as
past experience in parishes and mixed schools has shown, boys will soon make their exit: they dislike singing
alongside girls. To sing freely, or at all, they need the right ethos: a masculine team in a masculine league!
Today, outside cathedral choirs, scarcely a boy is singing. Indeed, the singing boy is now an endangered
species. So, if the boys go, what about the future supply of men singers? It seems clear, mainly female
choirs will be the outcome. Equal rights will have been won, but lost will be the magic, gone the glory.
Founder: Bernarr Rainbow, D Litt, Ph D, Hon FTCL
[ now 'Late' we are sorry to say ]The current President is: John Sanders, OBE, MA, D Mus Lambeth, FRSCM, FRCO
If you have difficulty reading this, press the button to change the background color (this will only work
with an advanced browser)
This page has been posted as a favor to my mother, who supports this cause (as do I, but not to the same extent -- modern
economics dictate providing your church music where you can get it, even though it may result in a regrettable loss of
quality). The issue of 'equal rights' regarding girls in the choir, however, strikes me as just plain silly if you are a true lover
of this sort of music: it was composed for boys' and men's voices, and does not adapt well to the different timbre of a
woman's voice (little girls can sound just as good as boys though). I think, too, that Dr Bernarr Rainbow (yes, that's his
name) has a point based on immutable sexist attitudes inalterable by Political Correctness that in effect mean that a co-ed
choir is de facto dominated by women -- males will flee, and the heritage will be lost. Although to be fair he does not come
out and actually say this outright. Well, I do.
If you want to e-mail me, send correspondence to Grobius. I will update the link to
the CDTCC site when it becomes available.
Their e-mail address is "info@cdtcc.org.uk".
Personal note: I have to admit that I was a choirboy in the 1950s. In the all-male
choir at St Mark's Episcopal church in Evanston, Illinois. It was actually a pretty
good choir (although the rival one at St Luke's was better, being more 'high
church'). We only had one treble of the top rank -- and it wasn't me. What the choir did leave me with was an abiding love for this sort of music, and in fact an improvement and refinement of my musical tastes in general. Being trained to
sing a contrapuntal part gives one a good knowledge of how music can be
structured and an appreciation of how it all interweaves, although WHY it does
is a mystery that is the composer's art. The actual musical training was rudimentary
compared with what one gets in a cathedral choir school. I learned to read music
only to the extent that given the starting note, I could tell from the score whether
the next note should be higher or lower, half a tone, full, or greater than that
(by counting do, re, mi along the staff lines -- luckily my mind was faster than my voice, and when the voice did its thing it was on key, which has never been
true after the 'change of voice' for some reason --- it just won't cooperate any
more, even though I know exactly what the note should sound like: not its name, C sharp, G flat, because I could never master matching the word or
placement on the staff to the sound, just as I know that mauve is a color and can distinguish it but couldn't name it if I saw it).
But much as I enjoyed SOME of the music (not hymns, and NONE of the
extracurricular choir activities like picnics and baseball outings), even at 12 years
old I had atheistic tendencies, and being behind the scenes, as it were, I soon lost
most respect for the Church as an institution, although it was a few more years
until I lost God entirely. Nowadays I won't set foot in a church except for
architectural appreciation -- and of course for the chance to hear this divine
music.
FastCounter by bCentral