International Association for Religious Freedom

NGO with UN consultative status supporting interfaith cooperation

100 years of advocacy and dialogue for liberty and equality

iarf

_________________________________________________________________

A Global Review of the Denial of Religious Freedom

Zarrín T. Caldwell

Summer 2001

This edition of "A Global Review" is the second in our regular series to update IARF members on situations of religious persecution around the world. We have selected a range of countries which were not featured in the last issue of IARF World. Please note that, from this time, global reviews such as these will be placed on our web site (http://iarf-religiousfreedom.net) on a quarterly basis. We hope that member groups can make good use of this information and alert other like-minded individuals and organisations to its existence. Watch out for the next update on the web in December!

United States

In early September, the world was shaken by news of terrorist incidents committed in the United States. This news dominated headlines both in that country and globally. Despite the legitimate goal of bringing the perpetrators of these heinous crimes to justice, law-abiding Muslims have, in turn, become targets of prejudice and discrimination. Early reports from the US and Australia indicated incidents of mosques being firebombed or vandalised, the stoning of a bus full of Muslim schoolchildren, physical assault against individuals, and hate speech directed towards the Muslim community.

Over10 American Muslim organisations met in Washington soon after the terrorist incidents to condemn the atrocities, but a statement from these organisations also asked law enforcement officials "to help protect mosques and Islamic centres from suffering the backlash of prejudice and stereotyping. We also ask that all Americans be extra vigilant and careful to defend against blaming and abusing American Muslims for this tragedy."

In remarks to the Islamic Center of Washington, DC, US President George W. Bush referred to the terrorist incidents. "These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenants of the Islamic faith. And it’s important for my fellow Americans to understand that," he said. He added that those seeking to intimidate Muslims in order to "take out their anger" represented "the worst of humankind."

In other US religion news, President Bush has been giving speeches around the country this summer to build support for his "Charitable Choice" programme in which religious groups would be granted federal funding for carrying out social service activities. A report released by the White House in August cited a variety of institutional barriers, "widespread bias" and "excessive restrictions" that religious organisations face in trying to carry out such activities. The legislation was designed to ease those restrictions and to ensure that religious groups are not themselves discriminated against in, according to Bush, "their important public work." There has, however, been a great deal of controversy over this initiative with concerns raised about the discriminatory hiring practices of religious organisations and potential attempts for these organisations to proselytise. The initiative has been opposed by groups such as Americans United for Separation of Church and State who fear that government funding will be used to promote certain religious beliefs. While a revised version of President Bush’s bill passed the House of Representatives by a narrow margin in mid-summer, action in the Senate is expected later this fall.

Egypt

While some groups claim there have been positive developments in Egypt’s protection of religious freedom in the recent past, most human rights organisations assert that discriminations still continue against certain religious minorities. Additionally, the Government maintains strict control of religious institutions in the country and this includes Islamic institutions such as mosques and universities.

In its’ 2000 report, the US Commission on Religious Freedom noted that there had been improvements in the Government’s protection of the rights to religious freedom, especially for the Christian community. These improvements, said the Commission, included the facilitation of church repairs and expanded coverage of Christian themes in the media. Nonetheless, the Commission reported that, "with respect to the Christian community, restrictions on church building and repair continue to exist and religiously-based discrimination, particularly in government employment, remains a pervasive problem." Church leaders are, however, pleased that Egypt’s Supreme Court has ordered a retrial of a highly-charged case concerned with the massacre of 21 Coptic Christians in a New Year’s riot in Al-Kosheh in January 2000. The retrial was announced in early August and is expected to take place later this fall. According to Worldwide Newsroom, the acquittal of 92 of 96 defendants this past February evoked outrage among the Coptic community. The Egyptian Government has been under international criticism for what was largely regarded as an unfair trial.

More troubling is the situation in Egypt with respect to the minority membership of the Bahá’í Faith. The Bahá’í Faith has been banned in Egypt since 1960 and Bahá’ís have been subject to arbitrary arrest and detention with properties confiscated. A statement of the Bahá’í International Community made to the U.N.’s Commission on Human Rights in June 2001 refuted statements made by the Egyptian delegation to the U.N. which accused Bahá’ís of extremism and of attacking Islam. The report went on note that such activities would be against Bahá’í tenants and that followers in Egypt continue to be denied basic human rights such as legal registrations of their marriages and the possibility of worship and community observances. Islam is the official state religion in Egypt and religious practices generally follow Islamic law (Shari'a) as the majority of Egyptians are Sunni Muslims. About 10 percent of the population are Christians with the majority of those belonging to the Coptic Orthodox Church. There are a smaller number of adherents to Judaism and the Bahá’í Faith.

Turkmenistan

In mid-August, officials from police, the local administration, and the National Security Committee (the KNB) disrupted a prayer meeting of the Greater Grace Protestant Church in the Turkmen capital of Ashgabad. The Keston Institute reported that attendees of the meeting were taken to the police department, interrogated, and eventually released. They were told by the authorities that they were not allowed to meet for prayers as their church was not registered. This incident follows the raid of a Baptist church by secret police officers in early July. The only officially registered religious organisations in Turkmenistan are the Russian Orthodox Church and the state-approved Spiritual Directorate of Muslims.

Keston reports that, among other groups, almost all Protestant churches, as well as communities of Jehovah’s Witnesses and Bahá’ís, have faced various kinds of harassment over the past several years in an effort to wipe out their activities. The practice differs from what is set forth in Article 11 of the Constitution of Turkmenistan which notes, "Everyone has the right independently to determine her or his own religious preference, to practice any religion alone or in association with others, to practice no religion, to express and disseminate beliefs related to religious preference, and to participate in the performance of religious cults, rituals, and ceremonies."

Keston further adds that Turkmen President Saparmurat Niyazov has also recently launched a campaign to stop the spread of Islamic schools. In June, he ordered the closure of an Islamic school in Tashauz and, according to the Religious Affairs Chairman Yagshymurad Atamuradov, students will instead attend a government-approved Islamic school in Ashgabad.

Laos

A statement from the US-based Lao Human Rights Council reports that the Communist Government in Laos has arrested and imprisoned more than 250 Hmong and Lao religious leaders and believers and closed down more than 60 Christian churches and religious institutions in several provinces. Jubilee Campaign, a Christian human rights organisation based in England, indicates that it has received information that the central government has secretly ordered local authorities to close down churches throughout the country. This information seems to be consistent with reports from various human rights organisations that church members are threatened at gunpoint, forced to sign documents to renounce their faith, and threatened with loss of land and livelihood if they do not do so.

Another British organisation, Christian Solidarity Worldwide, reported in July that 8 Protestants had been arrested and given shock treatments in an effort to get them to renounce their faith. A statement by the group noted that the men "were unable to bear the strain of their conditions, which for some included being held in stocks and handcuffs." Authorities are purportedly concerned about a growing evangelical Protestant movement in the country and especially among the Hmong people, a minority group which lives along the border of Laos and Vietnam.

The Associated Press (AP), in covering the Christian arrests in Laos, notes that Laos is predominately a Buddhist country with only a small proportion of Christians. "Although it is a one-party state, Laos’s constitution provides for freedom of worship," reports AP, "But in recent years there have been reports of localised persecution of Christians by officials apparently wary that church gatherings could be a focus of anti-government dissent. The secretive regime tolerates no political opposition."

Macedonia

The destruction and abuse of religious sites in Macedonia has been a hallmark of the recent conflict in a place where religion and ethnicity remain closely intertwined. The Keston Institute reports that attacks on Muslim religious sites is especially serious with some 44 of 500 mosques in the country having been destroyed. Most of these have been shelled by Macedonian security forces. According to Keston, there has been little or no damage to churches and monasteries. Alternatively, however, Albanian rebels (predominately Muslims) are apparently using Orthodox monasteries as military bases to prevent attacks by Macedonian security forces. The Organisation for Security and Cooperation (OSCE) in Europe issued a statement in early August expressing "grave concern" that "Albanian rebels in Macedonia appear to be using religious and cultural monuments as military bases."

The population of Macedonia is approximately 66% Macedonian Orthodox, about 25-30% Muslim, and the remainder are from minority faiths. In a welcome development, religious leaders from Macedonia, including the Orthodox Church, the Islamic community, the Catholic Church, the Evangelist-Methodist Church, and the Jewish community, issued a statement in mid-June condemning the abuse of religion in that country. The document stated, "Our churches and religious communities are not involved in the conflict, and we strongly reject any effort to allow ourselves to be involved and to be manipulated, as well as any misuse of religious symbols and language for the purposes of violence. …We condemn the use of sacred places and buildings for military purposes, and their desecration and destruction. Also, we condemn the incidents of harassment of religious people. The sacred nature of religious buildings must be respected, as must the personal integrity and dignity of clergy, representatives and officials of religious communities."

Chile

The Commission on Religious Cults, composed of members of Chile’s Parliament, have been investigating 20 cults which could be deemed destructive to Chilean society. Human Rights Without Frontiers reports the Commission members requested that the Minister of Justice order an investigation and, if the antecedents were proved, cancel the legal status of these organisations. According to El Mercurio, a Chilean newspaper, the Commission received testimonies of persons belonging to cults and concluded that some 100 organisations of this type operate in the country. The parliamentary group was apparently conceived following the disappearance to two youths affiliated with the "Tibetan Center of Studies," whose legal status has since been cancelled.

The Commission defined cults as having some of the following characteristics: the faithful are conditioned to engage in practices that violate human dignity, the faithful are encouraged to break ties with their families, followers are manipulated sexually, there are grave injuries to physical and mental health of followers, and leaders financially exploit their followers. An editorial by Jorge Enrique Precht Pizarro, Professor of Public Law at the Catholic Pontifical University of Chile, published in El Mercurio noted that a vast majority of countries have not resorted to specific legal classifications of cults, but have dealt with situations of abuse under criminal law. While Pizarro acknowledged that States have the "right and constitutional duty to intervene" in cases of "pseudo religious socially destructive groups," he added that "the law requires that secular forces not be employed to enforce ideas and much less religious beliefs. The State itself requires that a judicial regime not be created, or special penal sanctions for determined groups or individuals, but rather that common law be applied to all."

The list developed by the Commission in Chile has some resemblance to the French Parliament’s attempt to produce a list of cults. Subsequent to the last global issues update in the IARF World, restrictive legislation was passed in France at the end of May which has been widely criticised for its overly broad interpretations of what is considered appropriate religious practice and the State’s seeming interference with religious liberty. Interestingly, the French legislation has also been considered by legislators in Hong Kong as a potential model.

Spring 2001

Although freedom of religion is guaranteed by article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN Special Rapporteur on religious intolerance, Professor Abdelfattah Amor, recently noted that "the situation with regard to intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief is alarming." This article reviews what the absence of religious freedom actually entails in selected countries. Where relevant, we have also added notes about IARF’s involvement.

Most of the information below was synthesised from a range of materials available over the Worldwide Web. Owing to space limitations, we have left out some high-profile cases like the persecution of Christians in Sudan and the Falun Gong in China. We are sure there are many other cases about which we do not know. Hence, we are happy to hear from our members so we can keep our knowledge up-to-date!

Central Asia: Afghanistan

An international outcry erupted in early March 2001 over the Taliban’s destruction of two Buddhist statues in the Hindu Kush mountains in Afghanistan. Known as one of the area’s renowned archaeological treasures, the statues were created in the third and fifth centuries and their destruction was denounced by the United Nations and governments around the world, including Muslim states. Press reports from India quote former foreign secretary S K Singh, once India’s ambassador to Afghanistan, as noting, "It is out of sheer desperation that the Taliban have destroyed these artifacts. Basically, they are angry about the UN sanctions imposed on them in January and about their failure to get recognition from the international community. It is a shameful act of barbarism and the loss it has caused is irreparable."

Professor Kaleem Bahadur from Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi added, "Breaking idols is not Islam. … Jews lived in the Islamic state in Prophet Mohammed’s time. They had religious freedom. Islam tells you to respect other religions and the feelings of their followers. And where Muslims are in a majority, it is their duty to protect the minorities and their religious places." Bahadur went on to note that the Taliban’s actions are likely to hurt the image of Islam and may make life more difficult for Muslim minorities in other countries.

For their part, the Taliban claim that the statues are idols and such depictions are forbidden in Islam. Central Asian experts add that the Taliban may be using the demolition of the statues as means to unite a multi-ethnic Afghanistan in the name of religion. The BBC describes the Taliban as comprised of Afghans trained in religious schools in Pakistan along with former Islamic fighters, the Mujahedin, whose goal is to create a pure Islamic state based on Islamic law.

The issue of the destruction of the statues was discussed at the IARF International Council meeting. Our UN representative in Geneva, Gianfranco Rossi, has since raised this matter in an intervention on the subject of religious intolerance at the Commission on Human Rights in Geneva in March 2001.

South Asia: India

India is in the remarkable situation of being the home (indeed birthplace) of so many religions, all of which are protected by the constitution. Nevertheless, current problems of religious intolerance are a cause of continuing concern. Hindu nationalists are perpetuating violence against Christians, Muslims, and groups such as the Dalits, members of the oppressed (formerly "untouchable") castes. According to Worldwide Newsroom, India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is under pressure from its ideological wing, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak San (RSS) to construct a temple at the disputed site of Ayodha, where Hindu nationalists destroyed a centuries-old mosque in the early 1990’s. At the time, the incident led to violence around the country in which scores of people were killed. Tensions are also rising over a shrine claimed by Hindus and Muslims in the state of Karnataka. It is alleged that Hindu nationalists want to build temples at 900 of India’s historical monuments most of which are Islamic cultural sites.

While Muslim communities are normally safe and respected, there have been occasional violent communal clashes over the past 50 years, sometimes reciprocal, involving these communities and a small minority of hard core Hindu groups. Today, such Hindu nationalists are increasingly focussing on the Christian community. A 1999 report from Human Rights Watch chronicles persecution against this community over the past several years. Attacks have ranged from the killing of priests and raping of nuns, to the physical destruction of churches, and forced conversion of Christians to Hinduism. Possible underlying motivations for these attacks include both a response to what is seen as proselytism by some Christians and an effort to rally the tribal population for political ends. There is dispute in any given circumstance over whether such attacks are random, or part of an organised campaign.

In a more hopeful vein, the Hindustan Times reported in January that people donating and receiving blood following the devastating earthquake in India had cut across the communal divides between Hindus, Muslims, and Christians. They cited a case of over 100 Muslim youths who had saved the lives of nearly 100 Hindu quake victims by donating blood. Dr. Khan, a Muslim member of IARF’s International Council, has given testimony before the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom in Washington.

Far East: Vietnam

According to press reports, both Buddhist and Christian leaders continue to face arbitrary detention and arrest in Vietnam. Although such practices have been in existence since the victory of the Communist Party in the mid 1970’s, the issue has recently achieved more prominence with a US congressional hearing on the topic held in February and sponsored by the US Commission on International Religious Freedom. Witnesses at the hearing chronicled persecution against Buddhists, Catholics and Protestants in Vietnam.

Although Communist authorities have characterised the hearing testimony as "baseless and fabricated," human rights advocates have called for the imposition of US trade sanctions against Vietnam over this matter.

Recent developments include the detention of Father Van Ly, a Catholic priest; the detention of Thich Quang Do, a leader of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam; and the arrest of Le Quang Liem, a Hoa Hao Buddhist sect leader. Late last year, police apparently used force to dispel 3,000 of the Hoa Hao Buddhists taking part in a public ceremony. Communist authorities have also reportedly outlawed Protestant churches that have won large followings among the region’s indigenous minorities in recent years. Professor Amor from the UN visited Vietnam in 1998, but was not permitted to meet with many key religious representatives.

The Communist Party newspaper claims, "We have many times clearly stated that there is nobody arrested in Vietnam because of religion or their beliefs. The fact that some Buddhists and followers of other religions have been detained is because they committed offences against Vietnamese law and should be dealt with under the law."

Despite this "official" position, religious leaders in Vietnam have cited a new wave of oppression in the country and have jointly announced an alliance, the Vietnam Interfaith Council, to promote religious freedom. Some hold the view that the government is restocking its holdings of political and religious prisoners to use as bargaining chips for the upcoming debate on the ratification of the US-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement.

The Cao Dai, another religious group based in Tay Ninh which also suffers persecution in Vietnam, approached IARF for membership through their US office, the Cao Dai Overseas Mission. They have since been accepted as associate members by the Council.

Europe: France

Religious freedom advocates are closely watching developments in France related to legislation introduced last summer to curtail the activities of "sects or cults" in that country. Known as the About-Picard bill, the legislation seeks to modify existing laws and was adopted by the French National Assembly last June as a means to restrict "groups of a sectarian nature." According to Le Monde, the private bill was designed to target those religious groups found guilty of criminal offences and which are either regarded as "detrimental to the public order," or "dangerous for the integrity of the human personality." While generally supporting the intent of the legislation, religious representatives from across the spectrum have also criticised the French proposals for, among other things, targeting about 170 religious organisations, including those considered more mainstream. Of special concern was the creation of an offence of "mental manipulation" which many religious groups felt opened the door to excessive interpretation.

Based on the reservations expressed by a range of religious representatives, the Minister of Justice, and various human rights groups, the French Senate apparently made some language changes to the draft law. However, the legislation is still considered quite restrictive. Joseph Grieboski, president of the Institute on Religion and Foreign Policy in Washington, D.C., has expressed concern over the French proposal believing that it synthesises "an almost militant anti-religiosity spreading throughout western Europe that is influencing the emerging democracies of central and eastern Europe." He added that these emerging democracies do not have the kind of legal protections that countries like France do and, hence, overly broad laws could lead to more human rights violations. At press time in early May, the French Senate had voted in favour of the anti-cult law, but it was awaiting further action in the House.

IARF’s General Secretary has been approached by one of the affected groups. He asked them to consider whether any alternative legislation could be proposed which would meet the reasonable concerns of the State to protect its citizens. Certainly, IARF’s intent to develop a Voluntary Code of Practice may help to better define responsible religious practice.

Europe: Georgia

Following various attacks against Jehovah’s Witnesses, such as property destruction and burning of literature, the Georgian Parliament adopted a resolution on 30 March condemning religious violence. The Keston Institute reports, however that, on the same day, "the parliament adopted a constitutional amendment giving the Orthodox Church a special role in society," a move which has aroused concern from other religious groups. The amendment regulates relations between the Church and State across a number of areas, but those from minority faiths are concerned that the amendment does not clearly specify the position of other religious bodies. Disinclined to support any constitutional agreements with other faiths, a statement from the Orthodox Church noted that, as the traditional faith of the Georgian people, the Church had "the right to be regarded above other faiths." Regrettably, mobs of Orthodox extremists have been accused of recent violent attacks against peaceful religious gatherings of other faiths.

In several of the Newly Independent States, and certainly in Russia, religious organisations outside of traditional ones (such as Russian Orthodoxy, Judaism and Islam) have often had to go through a difficult registration process. Those concerned with religious freedom issues certainly kept a close eye on Russia’s passage of a law on religion in 1997 which was effectively designed to limit the activities of foreign religious organisations. The direction that President Putin will take policies on this subject still remains somewhat unclear.

Africa: Nigeria and Ivory Coast

Following the burning of churches and other forms of harassment in Northern Nigeria, dozens of Christian families have started to flee to the neighbouring country of Cameroon. While various state governors in northern Nigeria have begun to adopt the Islamic legal system of Sharia, they also claim that this law is for Muslims only and that Christians will not be affected. Nonetheless, Christian news reports have indicated that this is not the case and they cite the recent migration of Christian families to demonstrate the negative impact of the implementation of Sharia law on those who are not Muslim. Following the implementation of Sharia law in several states in Northern Nigeria last year, Muslim extremists have burned several church properties. The BBC also reports that there was terrible bloodshed last year when at least 2000 people died in fighting between Christians and Muslims. This occurred in a neighbouring state of Kaduna that has a much larger Christian population.

Similar unrest has been taking place in Côte d’Ivoire. Christians and ethnic southern Ivorians were singled out for attacks in a riot in the capital of Abidjan late last year. The fighting began when thousands of supporters of an ethnic northern Muslim-based political party protested a court decision to ban their Muslim leader from standing in parliamentary elections. Press reports indicate that, across the north of the country, police officers and soldiers have been shot and wounded, churches have been burnt down and Christians and southerners have been threatened and their homes vandalised. There is fear that such violence may lead to a northern Muslim versus southern Christian civil war.

IARF presently has very few member organisations in Nigeria. However, as part of our Strategic Plan, we intend gradually to build up contacts and programmes in Africa after the next Congress.

 

Advocacy | United Nations |History | Programs | Publications | Members | Links | Email

Copyright 1999 © International Association for Religious Freedom
2 Market Street, Oxford OX1 3EF, United Kingdom
Tel. 44 (0)1865 202 744, Fax 44 (0)1865 202-746
zarrin@iarf.net http://iarf-religiousfreedom.net