The Development of The Human
Personality
An Extract From Islam-A Modern Religion
I. The Law of Rabubiyyat
In the course of ages, the idea slowly dawned on man's mind and
gradually crystallised that
the world is not merely changing, but is developing towards
perfection. The changes are not
haphazard; nor erratic. They show a direction. In changing, the
world is unfolding its real
nature: in the process, what is implicit in it becomes explicit
and what is hidden is brought
to light. Purpose runs like a golden threada binding cordthroughout
the universe. The
progressive aspect of changes in the world did not escape the
notice of some early Greek
thinkers. The Greeks were an unusually gifted people and their
fertile imagination,
unhampered by tradition and custom, explored the realms of mind
and matter. Their
restless minds were ever shaping new theories and advancing new
viewpoints. They
anticipated the evolutionary theory, as they anticipated many
scientific theories of this age.
It is to the credit of modern science that by adducing palpable
evidence it has raised what
was a nebulous hypothesis, to the plane of a scientific theory,
or almost a law of nature.
Physics shows a picture of a developing and expanding universe.
Biologists describe in
minute, ornate detail the evolution of life from the protozoa and
protophyta to Homo
Sapiens. It is true that biologists, with the exception of
Lamarck, reject the concept of
purpose as alien to science. It is because purpose does not fit
into their conceptual
frame-work of natural science. But for the man who looks at the
world with an untainted
mind, purpose is a fact of observation: it is blinkers of science
that may prevent us from
noticing the purpose. Nevertheless, it is writ large on the face
of nature. We understand a
thing when we know its end. Nothing around us stays as it is at
one particular moment, it is
always changing and becoming something different to what it is.
As a rule, we are much
less interested in a thing as it is that in what it is tending to
become. Suppose while taking a
walk, we meet a man who is running fast. It is not by determining
his exact location at a
particular moment that we understand his activity, but by
learning about his purpose and
the goal he is heading for. The physical world as it develops, is
accomplishing a purpose.
Although the physical world is not conscious of the purpose,
nevertheless it is, in a sense,
its purpose which enhances its value and enriches it with new
attributes. The purpose is
positive, constructive and operates objectively. We may say that
the world is destined to
move towards and attain the goal ,which God, in His wisdom, has
set for it. This holds for
the outer universe. With man the case is quite different.
Possessing a free self, he can
develop and attain his own end only by free choice and personal
effort. Man cannot be
forced to develop; he must develop himself. Because man grows, he
is compared with a
plant in the Quran. The seed germinates and puts forth a young
shoot. The tiny stalk grows
in bulk and height. It becomes the full-grown tree which bears
fruit. It has fulfilled its
purpose by reproducing its kind. Man takes his origin in the
fertilised ovum. After birth, he
grows in size and strength, till he reaches maturity and is ready
for procreation. The
analogy cannot be carried beyond this point. Man, when he has
begotten children, has not
fulfilled his purpose. His destiny is far different from that of
the plant. He is not a mere
instrument for the preservation of his race. His body, no doubt,
has fulfilled its purpose
when he has begotten children, but he possesses a self and the
self does not beget its like.
It does not procreate. Says the Quran of the Divine Self that He
"neither begetteth nor is
He begotten (112: 3). This is also true of the human self which
thoughinfinitely lower than
the Divine Self, has more in common with it than with physical
objects or animals. The
self's. activity is creative, not procreative. It creates values
and the values enrich and
expand its nature and raise it in the scale of existence. While
the evolution of nature
proceeds under the direct control and supervision of God., man is
an active participant in
his own evolution. Man develops as a result of his own free
choice and deliberate voluntary
efforts. The evolution of his self, therefore, is governed by
laws distinct from those that
obtain for nature. He too cannot dispense with Divine help and
guidance, but these are
offered to him in a form which does not impair the integrity of
his self, nor imperil his
freedom. He is left free to accept or reject Divine guidance. Din
comprises the principles
of conduct which can lead him to his goal, but they would do so
only when they are freely
adopted and acted upon.
From this vantage point it is clear to us that development is the
rule in the world. In the
language of the Quran it is the Law of Rabubiyyat. This Law
states that God carries
forward the universe and everything in it from one stage to a
higher one. God keeps
everything moving forward, actualising its latent capabilities.
It is a dynamic universe and
the most dynamic being in it is man. In such a universe, there
will obviously be different
stages of existence. The Law of Rabubiyyat is tuned to each stage
of existence but its
purpose and aim remain unaffected throughout. The Law is the
sheet-anchor of the
universe, the guarantee that everything in it will develop to the
full extent of its capacity:
the only possible exception is man who, through his own volition,
may set himself against it
and misapply his freedom by choosing to descend instead of
ascending, to creep on earth
instead of soaring in the sky (7: 176).
II. Course of Self-development
The evolutionary process, in evidence in the outer world, takes
within man the form of
self-development. What are the conditions under which
self-development proceeds
smoothly without let or hindrance? Some conditions are common for
each stage of
development in general, others apply only to self-developmentthe
most exciting form of
development. Let us consider the common ones first. Nothing
exists by itself in isolation.
Everything is related to many other things and the relationship
between them is not merely
of co-existence, but of co-operation. The development, therefore,
depends on the presence
and co-operation of several factors. To take a concrete example,
a seed is capable of
growing into a tree. However, for its growth it depends on soil,
water, minerals, air and
sunlight. All these must not only be present, but they must also
bear proper relations to
each other and to the seed. If the seed is placed in one pot,
soil in another and water in a
third pot, nothing will happen. But if the seed is related to
these things in such a way that
they interact on each other, the seed will soon sprout and
burgeon. The human body too
develops through intimate interaction with environmental forces
and objects. All things in
the world are inter-dependent; they need each other and help each
other. This is still more
true of the self of man. The self can develop only in a social
environment, through
interaction with other free selves. It needs a society in which
there is internal harmony and
concord. It burgeons in the context of friendly relations with
kindred beings. Their
sympathy and co-operation are essential to its growth. The sense
of participation in social
activities directed to a noble end adds a new dimension to the
self. Self-realisation is
possible for man only in society, a society which is based on
justice and respect for human
personality, a society which is dedicated to the acquisition of
higher values. The society
which favours the growth of the self, is that in which every man
gladly helps others and
gratefully receives help from them. In a society torn by
dissension, the demands of the
physical self become imperative. In such a society, every man
will be thinking of himself
and his personal interests. His mind will be engrossed with the
problem of protecting his
life, property and children from other men. Biological motives
will dominate the mind and
the urge for a higher life will be relegated to the background.
In a society of this kind the
pursuit of the good is not possible. Man needs a society in which
all the members are
bound to each other by ties of friendship and animated by the
spirit of comradeship. Belief
in these values is the first commitment of belief in God. The
Quran exhorts man to build up
a society in which men are united by such an in God for the
purpose of collating a society
which is not wrought-up by internal tensions:
And hold fast by the cord of God, all of you, and be not divided
but remember the favour of God
towards you, when you were enemies and He united your hearts so
that you became, by His favour,
as brothers (3 : 102).
The society so cultivated and congenial is the Ummah of the
Quran. "This is how
He has raised an Ummah communityfrom among you"
(2 : 143). This is the
reason for the Qurans emphasis on corporate life and for
its disapproval of
monasticism. Goethe once remarked that character is formed not in
solitude, but in
the hurly-burly of life. The self shrinks and contracts in
solitude, while it grows and
expands through active and continuous participation in group
activities.
A harmonious, well-knit and integrated personality can take shape
only in a
balanced and concordant society. The human mind is the arena of
conflicting
desires. Society too carries the seed of discord as it is
composed of individuals with
different and often opposed tastes, interests and aims. In
society the resulting
conflicts should not be resolved by suppressing one party and
giving free rein to the
other. The true solution lies in mutual adjustment, in
reconciling one to the other
and in discovering an activity or a way of life which affords
reasonable satisfaction
to rivals. Balance and proportion should characterise personality
as well as society.
How can human personality acquire proportion? The answer is that
it can do so
only by taking as its model the Divine Attributes, Asma-ul-Husna
(Beautiful
Names).
The Divine Attributes, severally, represent the highest degree of
each intrinsically
valuable quality and they collectively reflect proportion of the
highest order. If we
bear in mind that proportion is an essential condition of beauty,
and some might go
so far as to say that proportion itself is beauty, it will be
clear to us why the term
Husna is applied to these attributes. These are beautiful because
each bears the
right proportion to others, so as to form a well-balanced whole.
Husn, however,
must be taken in a wider sense. It denotes not only physical
beauty but moral
beauty as well. Proportion is the only antidote to the poison of
discord and conflict
in the self as well as in society.
There is at least one marked distinction in the way of
development of the self from
that of the body. The body grows by taking and assimilating
nutrient substances
from the environment. The more nourishment it gets, the better is
its growth.
Paradoxically, the self grows not by receiving but by giving.
Generosity promotes
its growth and meanness checks it. The more the self gives of its
riches, the richer it
grows. If this basic truth is clearly perceived, men will rush to
the help of those in
need. Pride in possession will give place to joy in munificence.
They will think
more of what they can give than of what they can keep for
themselves. The
acquisitive instinct will be weakened and the impulse to give
will gain strength. The
Quran extols men who put the interests of others above their own
:
They prefer others before themselves although there be indigence
among them; and whosoever is
preserved from the covetousness of his own soul, these shall
prosper (59 : 9).
The tendency directly opposed to generosity that we have been
considering is
covetousness, termed shuh-un-nafs in the Quran (59: 9). It is
acquisitive, possessive
and egoistic. The covetous man wants to appropriate all the good
things within his
reach and is callously indifferent to the needs of others.
Suppose a number of men
are gathered at a water tap. They know that the flow of water
will cease in an hour
or so. Each is eager to fill his pitcher.
The covetous man elbows his way through the crowd, rudely pushes
the pitcher of
another from underneath the tap and places his own in its place.
He does not care if
others have to go without water. All he cares for is to have a
plentiful supply of
water for himself. Covetousness deadens the human self and the
Quran admonishes
us to be on our guard against this insidious disease of the self.
It exhorts us to help
all men, and not only our kith and kin. The Quran is objective
and universal in its
outlook. It seeks the welfare of all humanity and not only of a
particular sect or
community. According to the Quran, only that endures which
benefits "man
whoever he may be and to whatever country, nation or group he may
belong. We
would do well to reflect on the verse quoted below :
He sends down water from heaven, and the brooks flow according to
their (respective) measure,
and the flood bears along a swelling foam. And from the metals
which they smelt in fire seeking to
cast ornaments and necessaries, arises a scum like it. Thus Allah
coineth the similitude of the true and
the false. As to the foam, it goes off as refuse, and as to what
is profitable to mankind, it remains on
the earth. Thus God strikes out parables (13: 17).
The proposition, "Only that survives which is for the
benefit of all mankind together
with its corollary, "only those survive who benefit all
mankind are the fundamental
principles of self-development. The law is not "the survival
of the fittest," but "the
survival of the most munificent. " In other words, according
to the standard laid
down by the Quran, only the most munificent is the fittest to
survive. Those who
have imbibed the true spirit of the Quran, will eschew
selfishness and will dedicate
themselves to the service of humanity. They are the real Muslims.
Nationalism and colonialism have been dominant forces in the West
during the last
two or three centuries. Both generate narrow-mindedness and a
parochial attitude.
The European thought only of his own nation or empire. Even in
the West,
however, some thinkers have exhorted their compatriots to work
for the good of all
mankind. We quote an eloquent passage from
Rashdall's book on ethics:
It may be urged that the ideal is that I should be producing
something for another and find my good
in doing so; while he is working in turn for my good, and finds
his good in doing so.1
An eloquent defence of this view is to be found in Robert
Briffault's Making of
Humanity:
The peculiar means and conditions of human development
necessitate that development shall take
place not by way of individuals, but by way of the entire human
race; that the grade of development
of each individual is the resultant of that ecumenical
development (p. 260).
He says further :
The making of humanity! That is the burden of man's evolution ;
and that is the solid, may, somewhat
hard fact, of which the 'moral law' is the vaguely conscious
expression. It is not throbbing impulse of
altruism, no inspiration of generosity for its own sake, but a
heavy weight of necessity laid upon
man's development by the unbending conditions that govern it (p.
261).
On another place, lie has elaborated the point:
In the natural scale, that action is good which contributes to
the process of human development, that
act is evil which tends to impede, retard, oppose that process:
that individual life is well deserving
which is in the direct line of that evolution, that is futile
which lies outside the course of its advance;
that is Condemned which endeavours to oppose the current. That is
the natural, the absolute and
actual standard of moral values. Nature does not value the most
saintly and charitable life which
brings no contribution to human growth, as much as a single act
which permanently promotes the
evolution of the race. The only measure of worth of which nature
takes any account by perpetuating
itis the contribution offered towards the building tip of a
higher humanity (p. 352).
The real interests of the individual are not detached from but
are interwoven with
those of mankind. They are not antithetical to but are identical
with each other.
Man, therefore., realises himself by furthering the interest of
mankind. This is the
truth which the Quran proclaims. It regards all "mankind as
one community"
(10 : 19). It does not recognize the distinctions of caste, race,
creed or colour.
Mankind is one whole, a single, though complex, entity for it :
Your creation and your raising are but as those of single self
(31 : 28).
The Quran speaks of Kaba, the centre of the Muslim world,
as "an establishment
for the entire mankind" (5: 97). It holds that the
well-being of the individual
depends oil the well-being of the society. Muslims are enjoined
to work not for the
well-being of the Muslim community but for that of all mankind.
The Quran leaves
no doubt on this point, and Prof. Whitehead is in full agreement
with it when he
says that:
The perfection of life resides in aims beyond the individual
person in question.2
Mason says:
Man, in his individual capacity, self-develops his personality as
he satisfies his desires, and his
self-conscious interpretations of his subconscious knowledge of
his origin in Pure Spirit may influence
his activities. But, racially, man ought to engage only in such
activities as tend to extend creative
freedom to the utmost through the self-creativeness of all
personalities to their uttermost limits. Man
may turn from this second movement while holding to the first.
Man, therefore, may be moral
individually and immoral racially. The highest personalities
unite the two moralities.3
The interdependence of man is the recurring theme of the Quran.
The Quranic
programme for man has a twofold aim-the furtherance of the best
interests of the
individual as well as of the society. In working for the god of
mankind, man
achieves his own good as well. This view has been held by some
great thinkers in
the West also. We quote from Kant:
Act in such a way as to treat thyself and every other human being
as of equal intrinsic value ; behave
as a member of a society in which each regards the good of the
other as of equal value with his own,
and is so treated by the rest, in which each is both end and
means, in which each realises his own
good in promoting that of others.4
The Quran goes a step further and declares that "the
believers prefer others to
themselves although there is indigence among them" (59 : 9).
Julian Huxley, a great
scientist who holds no brief for religion, writes to the same
effect :
I believe that the whole duty of man can be summed up in the
words: more life for your neighbour as
for yourself. And I believe that man, though not without
perplexity, effort and pain, can fulfil this duty
and gradually achieve his destiny. A religion which takes this as
its central core and interprets it with
wide vision, both of the possibilities open to man and of the
limitations in which he is confined will be
a true religion, because it is conterminous with life; it will
encourage the growth of life, and will itself
grow with that growth. I believe in the religion of life.5
Julian Huxley, of course, does not believe that man needs the
help of Divine
Revelation. He holds fast to the view that reason alone can
enable man to grasp the
true relationship between himself and mankind. Here, be is
oversimplifying the
problem. He fails to see that mere intellectual apprehension of a
truth is not enough,
that it does not guarantee that we will always follow the hard
path he has suggested.
Reason may lead us to the lofty peak which gives a wider vision
of life, but
Revelation gives us the strength to stay there and order our life
in accordance with
that vision. Ovid's famous line is pertinent to the point,
"Video metiora prohoque
deteriora sequor !" (I see the better course but follow the
worse one !). Reason can
point out the right path but it lacks the power to compel us to
follow it. Revelation
supplements reason. It confirms and expands the vision granted by
reason and also
sustains and guides us in the arduous journey. to our goal.
Revelation summons
men to a fuller and richer life and is meant only for those ((who
are living" (36 :
70).
Life, we should bear in mind, is much more than physical
existence. It is a steady
and continuous progress towards a higher stage in social, moral
and intellectual
development. Man approaches this stage by helping his
fellow-beings to do the
same. If man pushes society forward, society in turn pushes him
on, and so both
rise to the desired higher level. Says the Quran:
O ye who believe! Respond to God and His apostle, when he calls
you to that which gives you life
(8: 24).
To . sum up, man is organically related to all mankind.
His vital interests are bound up with the interest of humanity.
He can fulfil himself
only by serving other men and by putting their interest above his
own. He realises
his good only by working for the general good. The Quran puts it
clearly:
(The believers say) : We feed you for the sake of Allah only. We
wish for no reward or thanks from
you (76: 9).
Man is really benefiting himself by serving other men. So the
question of reward
does not arise. As the Quran says
Is the reward of Ihsan aught save Ihsan ? (55 : 60).
Dedicated to the service of mankind, the believers keep the doors
of the
Rabubiyyat Order open to all. They sincerely rejoice at the
progress of others:
Those who spend their wealth in accordance with the Laws of Allah
(for the benefit of mankind) and
afterwards make not reproach and injury to follow that which they
have spent: their reward is with
their Rabb and there shall no fear come upon them neither shall
they grieve (2 : 262).
They are happy in serving others, seeking neither wealth nor
fame:
O ye who believe! Render not vain what you spend for the cause
prescribed by Allah by reproach
and injury, like him who spends his wealth only to be seen of men
and believe not in Allah and the
last day (2: 264).
So the Rasool, whose mission it was to summon men to the
Rabubiyyat Order,
declared:
And I ask of you no reward for it ; my reward is only with the
Rabb of all the worlds (26 : 109).
We must now face the crucial question, whether it is really
possible for man to
sacrifice his interests for the sake of the general good. No
doubt, man is endowed
with altruistic as well as egoistic impulses. But the egoistic
impulse which impels
man to appropriate all good things for himself, is far more
powerful than the social
impulse. Moreover, worldly wisdom too lends its support to the
egoistic impulse.
Few can resist the powerful
appeal of immediate personal gain. Mysticism seeks to strengthen
the altruistic
motive by inculcating into man ideas such as that the body is
utterly worthless, that
all sensual pleasures are sinful and that the world is shot
through with evil. It is
believed that if man is fully convinced that the body is an
obstacle to his "spiritual"
progress, he would cease to care for things that minister to its
needs. The Quran,
however, does not approve of this kind of other-worldliness. It
treats the body and
the world with the respect due to them. It tells us that there is
nothing sinful in
possessing worldly goods and in gratifying bodily needs. It fully
recognises the fact
that it is possible to have value experience through the body:
Beautiful for mankind is love of the joys (that come) from women
and children, and stored up
treasures of gold and silver,, and horses branded (with their
mark) and cattle and land. That is
comfort of the life of the world. Allah! with Him is a more
excellent abode (3: 13).
The Quran encourages man to enjoy the good things of the world:
Say : Who hath forbidden the adornment of Allah which He hath
brought forth for His servants, and
the good things of His providing ?
(7: 32).
Mysticism pleads for the suppression of the egoistic impulse
which would leave the
field open to the altruistic impulse. The Quran is opposed to
this view and asks us
to do justice to the physical self as well as the real self. How
can the interests of
these two selves be reconciled and how can man have the best of
both the worlds ?
This question is discussed in the next chapter.