Tepe Farukhabad
Tepe Farukhabad is a small mound
site located in Southwestern Iran in the Deh Luran Plain. It was
originally discovered in 1903 by Gautier and Lampre, but was not excavated
until many years later. It is an odd shaped mound, roughly 25 meters high,
and thought to be originally 200 meters in diameter. Since its original
inhabitation however, the Mehmeh River has eroded away roughly two
thirds of the site. Its location in the
Deh Luran Plain, in the foothills
of the Zagros mountains, along an ancient route that connected Susa and
Babylonia, made it a practical choice for the location of a trading center
(Wright 1997:181).
After his
work at Ur, completed in 1967, Henry Wright decided to continue on the
development of states and urban societies, but decided that he could best
contribute by focusing on factors other than agriculture. Instead he determined
to base his next project either on interregional trade, intercity warfare,
and diplomacy or on central political organization. He finally chose to
study the relationship between interregional trade, competition and the
rise of town centered settlements (Wright 1981:). Now that he knew what
he wanted, he just had to find a location.
Wright knew
he wanted a town on a trade route that was located between the mountains
and the lowlands. His attention was first directed to the area of the Deh
Luran Plain by Kent Flannery and Frank Hole. Their recent work in the Deh
Luran Plain done along with Neely and Helbaek had provided important information
on population, environment, chronology and subsistence pattern during the
Neolithic and Chalcolithic that were not available for the other areas
at the time. Flannery and Hole had also found sherds at Tepe Farukhabad
that dated back to the fifth millennium BCE, as well as beveled rim bowls
that dated from the fourth millennium, giving evidence that the site was
occupied at the appropriate times for the study of town development as
well as the trade patters of the area. Its location made it ideal for a
trade route study, and because it was small and the area was well defined,
it allowed multiple factors to be controlled by the excavator. Wright
decided it was an ideal site for the purpose of his study (Wright 1981:1).
The recent
work of Flannery and Hole had given evidence that supported the supposition
that the population of Mesopotamia was rapidly increasing during the period
of rising states, thereby decreasing the land that was available for use.
Also, the quality of the land that was available was declining (Wright
1981:1). This supposition led to the formation of two hypotheses that were
to be tested during the excavation of Tepe Farukhabad. The first was that
fortified towns and military organizational specialists were necessary
due to competition over the decreasing amount of agricultural land.
The second was that the growing production of export materials and the
increasing numbers of imports required a growing administrative body to
both organize the labor and the oversee the redistribution process (Wright
1981:Fig 2). Even if these hypotheses were proved to be incorrect, it was
still hoped that the relationship between craft trades and town growth
and development could be examined.
As mentioned
earlier, Tepe Farukhabad is and odd shaped mound that has been thoroughly
eroded by the Mehmeh River on the southwest side. The site is 190 meters
from the northwest edge to the southeast edge, and 140 meters from the
northeast to the southwest. The high central area is roughly 25 meters
about the ancient flood plain, and 30 meters below the mound's surface
(Wright 1981:4). The high central area is surrounded by a low flank. Early
descriptions of the site indicated that the central area was an earlier
village mound that had been subsequently built upon during the formation
of the larger town. It was supposed that the large public buildings were
placed on the high central mound, while the lower flanks held the more
domestic buildings of the town (Wright 1981:3).
After studying
ground and aerial photos of the mound, Wright decided to open at least
two soundings. One would be along the edge of the river cut face so as
to provided a stratigraphic sequence of the public buildings and associated
debris. The other would be close to the edge of the lower flank to transect
any fortification walls and to find any domestic buildings and the associated
debris. Interregional trade was to be examined through any changes in the
quantities of traded materials. Also, and examination of the architecture
involved in each trade would provide data on the organization of interregional
trade. Changes in subsistence techniques, land quality and the availability
of transport animals would be studied through a sequence of floral and
faunal remains acquired through the two excavations. Also, it was hoped
that an examination of nearby canal traces would reveal ceramics that would
allow the canals to be dated. And, finally, if time and funding permitted,
two more soundins would be opened in order to increase the sample area
(Wright 1981:3).
Excavations
at Tepe Farukhabad were opened on March 2, 1968, and were conducted bye
the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Ann Arbor, in collaboration
with the Iranian Archaeological Service; the project was headed by Henry
Wright (Wright 1997:182). A field camp was set up and 30 local workmen
were hired. A tent was rented and erected to act as an equipment depot
and a shelter for the workmen, and a Landrover was borrowed from the University
of Chicago's Oriental Institute.
Indications
on the surface of the site showed that the mound had probably grown as
much as Wright had speculated, but not during the assumed period. An initial
sounding was done on the low flank to reveal that there were several meteres
of Partho-Sasanial debris. Wright decided to focus on the high central
mound area.
Surveying
the site, Wright discovered that the mound had been eroded three times
by the Mehmeh River. The first erosion episode cut away the northwest corner,
which is now covered and stabilized with grasses. The second episode left
a long transect through the heart of the mound that was also stable. The
third episode was the one that cut the entire southwest half of the mound
way. This is still the site of active erosions, the result of which is
a steep cliff that is in constan danger of collapse. Wright chose to work
along the site of the second errosional episode, which could be worked
with ease and in relative safety. This location would also allow debris
to be dumped over the side of the excavation into the flood plain with
little difficulty. Extensive horizontal excavations would not be nearly
so practical or effective (Wright 1981:8).
Excavations
A and B, as they were called, were both five meters in width, and were
aligned northeast-southwest. The northeast-southwest placement was to all
ow them to be cut into the slope at right angles. The unit to the southeast
was Excavation A and the unit to the northwest was Excavation B. The two
excavation were placed exactly 45 meters apart to allow for future excavations
at Tepe Farukhabad. The excavations were then divided into one by one metere
squares, each designated by a letter/number grid. Each excavation was to
expose approximately 25 square meters. As the excavation proceeded, they
were stepped outward so as to keep roughly the same area exposed (Wright
1981:6).
Once a layer
was cleared of any architectural features, the whole area was cut down
by a few centimeters and then cleaned. A shallow step was then cut to reveal
any underlying deposits. Possible walls and features were defined on the
new surface, and any stratification was defined on the section cut. Most
layers were divided into sections for removal. Thick layers, those over
fifteen centimeters in depth, were arbitrarily divided into upper, middle
and lower layers for removal. Only the thinnest of layers were removed
as a whole unit. Color changes and floor surfaces were noted, and four
floor types were defined. These were 1) very well-prepared floors that
had a base of some sort and were then plastered; 2) ordinary floors that
were covered only in mud plaster; 3) simple floors that were only compact
surfaces that were not covered or protected in any way, and 4) ephemeral
floors that were discontinuous compacted surfaces that were both with and
without coverings. The stratigraphy was relatively clear and was multi-colored,
allowing for good control. Only once was control lost, and this was due
to the cross-cutting of a green staining, which is believed to have been
the result of the percolation of ancient sewage (Wright 1981:6).
When features
were found they were isolated, drawn in plans, photographed, numbered,
and then removed. All debris from the excavations was sifted, with the
exception of the debris from the from the cleaning of the sections, known
mud brick walls and known animal burrows. When there was any question,
the debris was screened. This allowed for the recovery of bone fragments,
chipped stone and small samples of bitumen that were used in statistical
analysis of the site. A serial excavation catalogue was used to record
the artifacts found.
Mud brick
wall stubs were the most common type of feature. When a wall stub was found
brick alignment was noted then isolated by removing any refuse or collapsed
brick from the wall down to floor level. Working from the sides, the brick
face or plaster was searched for, although this was no always possible.
If it was determined to be a wall and not just a pile of loose brick, the
feature was numbers, meassured and mapped. Other features included pits,
hearths, postholes, piles of brick and stone and burials (Wright 1981:6-7).
Sampling
was another important aspect of the excavations. Water flotation was used
to recover carbonized plant remains, as well as retouch flakes, rodent
bones, and any other small item susceptible to flotation. Any charcoal
found was collected for radiocarbon testing to determine age, and earth
samples were cut for pollen analysis (Wright 1981:7).
During the
last few days of excavation, a third trench was dug, this time further
out on the northeast slope. This was an extension of the original sounding
down on the first days at the site. The purpose of Excavation C, as it
was named, was to provide data on the outer perimeter of the central mound.
The one meter wide trench was stepped down the slope, cleaned and recorded.
Most of what was found consisted of small buildings that dated to the second
millennium. Artifacts that were found in the small trench were kept as
samples to used for dating purposes. Excavations were closed on April 30,
1968.
The original
idea had been to study the rise of organized states due to competition
and trade. However, during excavation, it became apparent that there were
few, if any, direct traces of conflict at Farukhabad. Weapons were not
found and there were no surviving defensive walls. Any defensive structures
that there might have been were eroded away long ago. But even though Wright
was not able to realize his goal of examining competition and conflict
at Tepe Farukhabad, he was very pleased with the data on trade. Relative
increases in the quantities of imports were found as he had surmised. Local
materials of lower quality than those imported allowed for speculation
on the value of certain imported material relative to the local wares (Wright
1981:3). For example, Excavation A, which contained a greater proportion
of well-maintained structures on mud brick platforms and public storehouses,
also contained a greater amount of high quality imported chert, while in
Excavations B, which contained more modest domestic structures, more low
quality chert of local origin were found (Wright 1997:182). Also, waste
products form certain processes, such as bitumen processing, were found
and measured, giving an indirect measure of the amounts of exports flowing
from Farukhabad that would not have been possible otherwise (Wright 1981:3).
Finally, the excavations at Farukhabad, as well as those elsewhere, produced
direct evidence of the activities of the administrators. For a project
that lasted only two months, a sizable amount of data was collected. Although
he was unable to follow up on the regional confict portion of the excavation,
Wright was satisfied with the results (Wright 1981:3-8), and one original
goal of the excavation, to increase the knowledge of interregional trade,
was fulfilled.
Bibliography
Wright, Henry
1981 An Early Town on the Deh Luran Plain: Excavations
at Tepe Farukhabad. Ann Arbor: Regents
of The University of Michigan.
Wright, Henry
1997 Tepe Farukhabad. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Ancient
Near East, 5:181-183.
New York: The Oxford University Press.
|