![]() |
Aktuelle
Physik 16. Mai 2001 © email: Krahmer |
AIP |
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News Number 536 April 27, 2001 The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News Number 537 May 2, 2001 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and James Riordon
ULTRASONIC
BANDGAP MATERIALS are to sound waves what
semiconductors are to electrons and photonic bandgap
materials to light waves: they allow some energies (or
frequencies) and not others. The hope is to fabricate the
acoustic equivalent of various electronic or optical
elements, such as mirrors, lenses, even switches and
"transistors" in some future acoustic
integrated circuit. The trouble is that, as with the
optical counterpart, it has been difficult to achieve
full exclusion of certain acoustic frequency bands in
"phononic" materials. Pressing ahead anyway, a
group of physicists in Spain have produced an ultrasonic
wedge which, even without perfect acoustic bandgap
performance, can split a beam of sound waves or steer the
sound through an angle of 90 degrees. At the Instituto de
Fisica Aplicada in Madrid (contact Jose Aragon,
joseluis@iec.csic.es, 34-915-618-806 x 251) researchers
create a material consisting of mercury cylinders
inserted into a slab of aluminum (see figure ). The
researchers noticed that in refracting through their
device the sound waves did not conform to Snell's law,
the classical equation governing the propagation of waves
from one medium into another, a phenomenon (probably
related to the interaction between the waves and the
compound crystalline environment of the wedge) which
might be applicable to the case of light waves. (Torres
et al., Physical Review Letters, 7 May 2001) THE LIMITS OF SUPERLUMINAL PROPAGATION. Last year, L.J. Wang and his colleagues at the NEC Institute reported that a composite wave pulse traveled with little distortion through a medium at a group velocity faster than c, without violating Einstein's theory of relativity, or the notion that cause precedes effect. (Update 495) Sent into a chamber of specially prepared cesium atoms, the light pulse exited the chamber before the peak of the input pulse entered it. This can happen because the early part of the pulse, made of many component waves, contains all of the information in the wave. Once inside the chamber, the pulse is rearranged such that the peak reappears at a position a little farther ahead in the chamber. This causes the composite pulse to emerge from the chamber earlier than if it had been traveling through the chamber at the speed of c. Potential applications involve the possibility of shuttling along light waves faster in applications such as telecommunications and computers. How to define and analyze the speed of signal transfer in that setup is a subject of a new paper by the same researchers, along with two other physicists: Peter Milonni of Los Alamos and Raymond Chiao of UC Berkeley (chiao@physics.berkeley.edu). They consider the effect that quantum noise, due in part to random spontaneous emission by the medium, has on the reliability with which a signal can be measured. The more one tries to push along the signal in the medium, the greater the number of noise-producing, signal- obscuring spontaneous emissions that occur, and any attempt to boost the signal's intensity to make it more detectable introduces delays such that the signal velocity always ends up to be less than c. Therefore, the signal velocity is defined operationally as an optical signal-to-noise ratio. In summary, the researchers extended the special relativity speed limit of c for sharp wavefronts (which act like "on-off" signals), to that of a more realistic smoothly varying signal, based on a speed limit set by quantum fluctuations. (A Kuzmich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 30 April 2001.) |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MAJOR NEW
COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND (CMB) measurements
uphold the idea of an early "inflationary" era
during which the observable universe expanded with
superluminal speed and tiny quantum fluctuations in the
density of matter were amplified into much larger
structures. These structures are imprinted in the CMB as
faint variations in the temperature across the microwave
sky. The CMB, the curtain of photons set free when the
expanding universe became cool enough to permit the
existence of neutral atoms, is the earliest, largest, and
furthest observable thing in all of science. The best way
to extract cosmological information from the CMB is to
plot the observed microwave power as a function of the
angular size of regions contributing to the CMB. The
inflation model predicts that this spectrum should
feature a number of peaks. The first peak, at an angular
size of about 1 degree (about twice the angular size of
the Moon), corresponds to the largest blobs of matter in
the primordial plasma at the time of the CMB (about
400,000 years after the big bang). Subsequent peaks
should correspond to blobs that had come together under
the action of gravity but had then rebounded outward
because of radiation pressure, and later still had
condensed for a second or third time, etc. A year ago the
Boomerang collaboration, which used a balloon-based
detector floating over Antarctica, provided a detailed
map (Update 481) of the first peak which, besides falling
at the 1-degree size predicted by inflation, also
determined that the overall curvature of the universe was
zero. But Boomerang, and another detector group, Maxima,
saw scant evidence of any other peaks, and this puzzled
astronomers. All this changed earlier in the week at the
American Physical Society (APS) meeting in Washington,
DC, where the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI)
collaboration, which parks its microwave detector on the
roof of NSF's South Pole station, presented solid
evidence for a second and third peak. The DASI results
(John Carlstrom, University of Chicago, 773-834-0269)
were largely in concert with Boomerang's presentation at
the meeting (Barth Netterfield, Univ Toronto,
416-946-5465); Boomerang used a new type of analysis and
reported 14 times more data than last year. The microwave
spectra for the two groups were similar (see figures at http://www- news.uchicago.edu/releases/01/dasi/index-embargoed.shtml; oder http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~boomerang/press_images) as were the values of various cosmological parameters. For example, the position of the first peak yields the total energy of the universe (a parameter, denoted by the letter omega, expressed as a fraction of the critical density needed for halting the cosmological expansion). Boomerang and DASI found values of 1.03 and 1.04, respectively, with about a 6% uncertainty. Comparing the height of the first and second peaks, one can calculate the expected percentage of all energy in the universe that exists in the form of ordinary matter (baryons). This turns out to be about 5% for both groups, a fact that agrees well with predictions made by the independent "big bang nucleosynthesis" theory. It is harder to nail down other cosmological parameters, such as the percentage of energy in the form of dark matter or dark energy (energy lurking in the vacuum and responsible for the newly discovered net acceleration in the cosmological expansion). The new CMB measurements suggest values of about 30% and 65%, respectively, again in keeping with recent expectations. New Maxima results (Shaul Hanany, Univ Minnesota, 612-626-8929) presented at the meeting did not have nearly the statistical weight of the other two groups, but were generally consistent; the three- way agreement brought a great round of applause from the audience of astronomers eager to unravel the mysteries of the early universe. Noted cosmologist Michael Turner (Univ Chicago, 773-702- 7974) observed that last year's discovery of the first microwave peak constituted the first great vindication for the Inflation model and that this new discovery of secondary peaks was the second great vindication. The third type of evidence, Turner said, would be the detection of gravity waves from before the time of the CMB. (Recently posted preprints on the Los Alamos server (http://xxx.lanl.gov/) include the following: Maxima astro- ph/014459; Boomerang astro-ph/0104460; and DASI astro- ph/0104488, 89, and 90.) UNEXPECTED PHYSICS
CONDITIONS IN RHIC COLLISIONS. At the APS meeting,
speakers from all four detector groups (BRAHMS, PHENIX,
PHOBOS, STAR) at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
(RHIC) agreed that it is too early to declare a sighting
of the coveted quark-gluon plasma (QGP), a primordial
soup of free-ranging quarks and gluons. But presenters
said they found preliminary signs of tantalizing QGP
"prerequisites." Studying the products of
RHIC's collisions between near-light-speed-velocity
gold-ion beams, all four detector groups measured a more
equal ratio of antiprotons to protons (roughly a 3:2
ratio, according to BRAHMS measurements) than ever before
seen in nuclear collisions. This is the closest
reproduction yet of the matter-antimatter balance thought
to prevail at the time of the Big Bang than previously
achieved in the laboratory, said PHOBOS member Russell
Betts (U. Illinois at Chicago). In fact, the abundance of
protons and antiprotons in the collision products was
surprising, raising possibilities of a new production
mechanism for proton-antiproton pairs or a suppression in
the production of lighter particles, said PHENIX's Sam
Aronson (Brookhaven). Studying the highest-momentum
products moving transversely to the direction of the ion
beams, the groups found hints of "jet
quenching," the idea that the particles lose
significant energy while traveling through the collision
fireball. Such a large energy loss does not occur in
ordinary nuclear matter. In addition, the STAR
collaboration observed that the collision fireball
expanded violently, at supersonic speeds. Voicing a
minority view, STAR member John Cramer (U. Washington)
speculated that such a violently exploding fireball may
mean that RHIC is operating at energies higher than those
required for creating a QGP (expected by some to expand
more gently). However, all agree that the picture will
become clearer in RHIC's next experimental run, slated to
begin later this month, in which the groups expect to
gather 10-100 times more data from the accelerator, which
will be able to run, for the first time, at its maximum
energy of 100 GeV/nucleon. |