Gallery Next Previous  Top Menu Nasca Monkey Report The Horse Debate  Articles

 

                     The Trans-Atlantic Foot-Square


Quick recapitulation:

The Cone & Square idea controls the Athena engraving from La Marche,
France,  as well as the figure of a monkey from Nasca, Peru. We have just 
seen a clean solution to the diagram above, showing the Main Square, and
the so called Foot Square. The Main Square in the diagram above is shown
as a diamond,  top corner planted on the frame above the monkey's left ear. 
The rectangle framing the whole figure looks planned, because its axes divide 
the figure in good order
. The monkey's spine becomes a tunnel for the vertical
axis, while the horizontal axis follows the base of the arms (see abstart.gif). 
These axes run East-West and North-South, as well.
This experiment led to more frames,  one of them being the rectangular box 
about the monkey's feet, which we expand into a square.
The Main Square and the Foot square are both seen in the diagram below.
The Foot Square's circumcircle duplicates the Main Square's 'golden Phi-ratio circle. Although we derived each circle independently of the other, the golden circle centered in the lower corner of the square is a tangent to the Foot-Square.
In this classic construction, the orange circle circumscribes the Foot Square, 
and the blue circle is the Main Square's golden circle.  We can clearly see how the Foot Square was added to
the classic position.



Does this culminative idea of the monkey's geometry also become evident
in the Athena engraving? Does the transatlantic connection continue? Will 
the same Foot Square have anything special to do with Athena's feet? If so, 
then the hypothesis was not wild, at all. We really are on to something  big. 
                                                *
The Athena engraving already has its Main Square, so we can fit it with
the diagram from above (square over square. Check the result below.


This time, instead of fitting over both feet, the Foot Square and circle fit over Athena's right foot. Note the fit between Athena's foot and the square inscribed within the Foot Square.
The experiment becomes even more productive, when we find out that the Foot Square also fits Athena's head, and does it perfectly (diag. above). 

In the magnified view below, the left foot is just as wide as the Foot Square. So, in the Athena engraving,  the Foot Square also plays an important role.
http://www.oocities.org/jirimruzek/namon4.htm


It is unbelievable that the Foot Square should fit Athena's head with precision even under magnification. But, there it is in the diagram below.
Extending the Foot Square into a rectangle fitting the head from the chin to the top of the head produces interesting PHI proportions. 

The top of the head is to the face  . 
         1 / 1.618 = 0.618
as the face is to the entire head

        1.618 / 2.618 = 0.618
The head's height is Phi squared ( 2.618..)

The face to the top of the head:
       1.618.. /1   =  1.618..
Head to the face: 
       2.618..  /   1.618... = 1.618..

The 1/4 level of the square is marked by engraved points (eye-level, top of the nose-bridge). 
                       0.5 + 0.6180339 = 1.1180339...
This is the important value of the square root of 5 divided by 2.
                                               *
The Ancients display a variety of Golden Section  constructions, and the Nasca and La Marche geometries complement  each other.  Chances of the Ancients not knowing the basic Golden Section (Phi-ratio's construction) are effectively nil. This modicum of certainty once again proves the prehistoric existence of the so called Lost Science.


 
 
Next
Previous  Top Menu Old Articles  The Horse Debate