doctorfixit - 09/24/99 22:22:54
My URL:http://home.earthlink.net/~doctorfixit/reforms/
My Email:doctorfixit@earthlink.net
Comments:
Your link to my page is obsolete.  I mailed you about this a long time ago.  
Ten Reforms That Will Save America.
http://home.earthlink.net/~doctorfixit/reforms/
a - 08/16/99 02:09:39
My URL:http://a
Comments:
Comments:
Je n'aime pas vraiment votre page. Elle ne pensent pas que c'est très intéressant. Vous devriez l'essayer encore. J'espère que ceci aide. Bonne Chance!
Richard Lavallee - 11/21/98 00:02:42
My URL:http://home.earthlink.net/~doctorfixit/
My Email:doctorfixit@cyberdude.com
Comments:
Right On! Great Site!
Robert Moore - 10/10/98 03:50:25
My URL:http://www.enenkio.wakeisland.org
My Email:enenkio@enenkio.wakeisland.org
Comments:
SIR.
The following electronic message contains an urgent Diplomatic 
Communiqué and solicits your immediate attention.  If it has reached you 
in error, please forward it to the proper state authority with sincere 
appreciation from H.M. King Hermios, residing in exile.
* # * # * # * # * # * # BEGIN # * # * # * # * # * # *
Your Excellency:
Recent articles defaming the government of the Kingdom of EnenKio have 
been maliciously published under the guise of a Marshall Islands 
government warning against "fraudulent claims".  We have once more 
admonished the writer of the articles in the Marshall Islands for 
disregarding indisputable facts which clearly discredit his biased report.  
We urge you to disregard all discourse in the media regarding the 
Kingdom of EnenKio which are not validated.  To that end, you are 
cordially invited to contact this office with your specific questions or 
concerns.  For your advice, the following statement was issued by the State 
Secretary of the Kingdom in reply:
The Kingdom has never knowingly made any fraudulent claim whatsoever.  
No claim we have made has ever been shown to be fraudulent, nor has any 
claim ever come under or faltered from a challenge by anyone anywhere in the 
world.  We are working vigorously to regain occupation of the ancestral 
property of H.M. King Hermios, to resolve the virtual "state of war" that 
exists with the United States government and to be accepted as an honorable 
state among nations.  
The Kingdom does not pretend to be "asserting authority over land…within 
the geographical and political boundaries…" of the RMI.  We are however 
striving to expel the armed imperialistic invasion forces of the United States 
from the shores of EnenKio Atoll so natural Marshallese supremacy can be 
reestablish there.  As to allegations of fraud and constitutional violation, no 
one has dared to come forward with any such a charge.  We say, let the issue 
be played out in the People’s venue for the record, not in a libelous weekly 
publication.  While we do not wear our brief history on our shirtsleeves, our 
raison d’être is clearly mandated in the Preamble to the Constitution of 
EnenKio, which can be seen at our web site: 
http://www.enenkio.wakeisland.org.
Referencing the news article in the Marshall Islands Journal entitled 
"’Kingdom of EnenKio sets up in New Zealand," of May 1st, the editor was 
advised, contrary to his report, that neither passports nor driver licenses can 
be purchased from the Kingdom’s web site.  The Kingdom of EnenKio Atoll 
DOES NOT SELL PASSPORTS!  If you have evidence to the contrary, our 
Foreign Ministry would appreciate your furnishing it to them so steps can be 
taken immediately to investigate the matter.  You are advised if anyone sells 
or offers to sell an EnenKio passport, that such an act is patently illegal.
The published statement: "The group…claims to represent Iroijlaplap Murjel 
Hermios and the atolls of the Ratak chain…", is wholly false.  I have 
explained this matter to the editor on several prior occasions and ample 
information is available at our internet site to refute the statement.  The 
Kingdom does not represent any area outside of its territorial boundaries, as 
the Ratak atolls surely are.  Contrary to their libelous statements, the 
Kingdom of EnenKio Atoll was not "created" by Robert Moore and he is not a 
"Honolulu-based attorney.  H.M. King Murjel Hermios is the acknowledged 
hereditary Iroijlaplap of the northern Ratak atolls and is also First Monarch 
of the Kingdom, not of his own choice, but by a legal process and free choice 
of our citizens who participated in the founding of the nation in 1994.  Such a 
noble and peaceful beginning is not too uncommon in world history.
 "Enenkio" (actually Enen-kio or Eneen-Kio, in reference to the atoll itself) is 
the first Marshallese name for a Marshallese atoll located roughly 300 miles 
north of Bok-ak (Taongi) Atoll.  "Wake" is a fictitious moniker applied to the 
rediscovered Enen-kio atoll by unknown western society writers. 
The following is excerpted from a letter to the Secretary-General of the 
United Nations and is hereby offered for your highest consideration and 
eminent acceptance:
Re: Notice of Accession to Hague Convention I for Pacific Settlement of 
International
Disputes (1898) [UKTS 9 (1901) Cd. 798]; and Hague Convention for 
Pacific Settlement of International Disputes (1907) [UKTS 6 (1971 Cmnd. 
4575].
Now Be It Hereby known, that the Iroijlaplap of the Northern Ratak Atolls 
of the Marshall Islands who holds native and aboriginal title over the atoll 
of EnenKio (incorrectly referred to as Wake, Wilkes and Peale Islands) as 
noted in the United Nations Constitution on Indigenous Peoples Rights, as 
Monarch of the Kingdom of EnenKio, hereby accedes as a "State" to the:
              Hague Convention I for Pacific Settlement of International
                     Disputes (1898) [UKTS 9 (1901) Cd. 798]; and
                                           
               Hague Convention for Pacific Settlement of International
                      Disputes (1907). [UKTS 6 (1971 Cmnd. 4575]
[hereinafter collectively the "Conventions"]; said Conventions to apply to, 
inter alia, the Atoll of EnenKio (The Kingdom of EnenKio) and the Atolls of 
the Northern Ratak Atolls of the Marshall Islands; being Taongi, Aowan, 
Bikar, Utirik, Takar, Aur, Maloelap, Wotje, Erikub and Ailuk. 
It is intended by this Notice that the Kingdom of EnenKio be and hereby is 
an acceding "party" to the Convention, as the term "party" is signified in 
the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties UN DOC. A/CONF. 39/27, 
(1969), 63 A.J.I.L. 875 (1969), 8 I.L.M. 679 (1969) at Article 2, Paragraphs 
1(a), (b) and (g), and Article 11. 
Furthermore, it is intended for purposes of this Notice that the Kingdom of 
EnenKio be treated as a Sovereign State with full "political existence of the 
state independent of recognition by other states" as expressly stated in the 
Convention on Rights and Duties of States, 49 Stat. 3097, T.S. 881, 165 
L.N.T.S. 19, 3 Bevans 145, done at Montevideo, Uruguay on December 26, 
1934 which states at Articles 2 and 3:
"The federal state shall constitute a sole person in the eyes of international 
law."
"The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other 
states. Even before recognition the state has the right to defend its integrity 
and independence, to provide for its conservation and prosperity, and 
consequently to organize itself as it sees fit, to legislate upon its own 
interests, administer its services, and define the jurisdiction and 
competence of its courts."
 
This Notice of Accession is respectfully given in accordance with the 
expressed statements made at the First Conference of Members of the 
Court, Permanent Court of Arbitration, Peace Palace, The Hague, 10 and 
11 September 1993 "Summary of Views" at Page 4, Paragraph 14, to wit:
ManyStates are not parties to either Convention. The PCA, and 
    Government of the Netherlands as the depository of the Conventions, 
    should continue their efforts to encourage States to become Parties to 
    the Conventions. The Secretary-General was invited to develop a 
    documentation package to facilitate the procedure for accession. In 
    the course of discussion, one Member indicated his Government's 
    intention to shortly accede to the Convention.
Furthermore these rights are respectfully requested under Resolution 1514, 
on the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Territories 
and Peoples, adopted in 1960, which states: 
The subjugation of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and 
    exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is 
    contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to 
    the promotion of world peace and cooperation.
All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right 
    they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their 
    economic, social and cultural development. . . .
Immediatesteps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing 
    Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained 
    independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, 
    without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely 
    expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or 
    color, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and 
    freedom. 
Notice is hereby further given that the Kingdom of EnenKio requests 
immediate access to the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague to 
settle matters of the illegal occupation by the United States Government of 
EnenKio Atoll (Wake, Wilkes and Peale Islands) in order to peacefully 
adjudicate the disputes by arbitration. 
It is further hereby proclaimed that the Government of the Kingdom of 
EnenKio shares the opinion of the Members of the Permanent Court of 
Arbitration, Peace Palace, The Hague, who participated in the First 
Conference of Members of the Court on 10 and 11 September 1993 
expressed in the "Summary of Views" that "Peaceful settlement of 
international disputes is the cornerstone of international law," and further 
the Members’ comments found at Page 4, Paragraph 15, to wit: 
Lackof financial resources should not prevent a party from having 
    recourse to the PCA. It would therefore be useful to create a fund out 
    of which parties with limited resources could be compensated in some 
    measure for the costs they incur in connection with proceedings before 
    the PCA. Consideration should also be given to providing the services of 
    the PCA in arbitration taking place at locations other than The Hague, 
    e.g., at regional arbitration centers like Cairo or Kuala Lumpur, or 
    even in the territory of a developing country party to a dispute, if the 
    parties to the dispute so agree. [Emphasis added]
Please take further notice that authorized representatives of the 
Government of the Kingdom of EnenKio have previously attempted to 
access courts in the Hague without success to put forward, and have 
adjudicated, the case over the illegal settlement and seizure of EnenKio 
Atoll. 
EnenKio Atoll has a historic place in Marshallese tradition and has been, 
until the more recent occupation by the United States Government, 
controlled by the Iroijlaplap of the Northern Ratak Atolls whose ancestor 
by hereditary right is the Honorable Murjel Hermios. 
To this effect be it known that 1960 Declaration formed the basis of the UN 
decolonization practice, and, in 1963, the General Assembly established 
what became known as the Decolonization Committee, to assist in the 
implementation of the Declaration.
In 1975, the ICJ considered the status of the right to self-determination in 
its advisory opinion in the Western Sahara Case.(10) Since the 1880s, 
Western Sahara had been a Spanish colony. In 1966 the General Assembly 
decided that Spain should hold a referendum to enable the population of 
the territory to exercise freely its right of self-determination. Before the 
referendum was held, however, both Morocco and Mauritania asserted 
claims to Western Sahara on the basis of "historic title" predating Spain's 
colonization in the 19th century. The General Assembly requested an 
advisory opinion from the ICJ on the question of the legal ties between 
Western Sahara and Morocco and Mauritania. In the course of its opinion, 
the Court considered the basic principles governing the de-colonization 
policy of the General Assembly.
.   . . . As the Court stated in its Advisory Opinion of 21 June 1971 [in 
    the Namibia case],
    . . . the subsequent development of international law in regard to non-
    self-governing territories, as enshrined in the Charter of the United 
    nations, made the principle of self-determination applicable to them 
    all. (1971 ICJ 31)
The principle of self-determination as a right of peoples, and its 
    application for the purpose of bringing all colonial situations to a 
    speedy end, were enunciated in the Declaration on the Granting of 
    Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. . . . The 
    [Declaration] thus confirms and emphasizes that the application of 
    the right of self-determination requires a free and genuine expression 
    of the will of the peoples concerned. . . .
GeneralAssembly resolution 1514 provided the basis for the process of 
    decolonization which has resulted since 1960 in the creation of many 
    States which are today Members of the United Nations. It is 
    complemented by General Assembly resolution 1541. . . . The latter 
    resolution contemplates for non-self-governing territories more than 
    one possibility, namely:
(a) emerge as a sovereign independent State;
(b) free association with an independent State; of
(c) integration with an independent State.
The validity of the principle of self-determination, defined as the need 
    to pay regard to the freely expressed will of peoples, is not affected by 
    the fact that in certain cases the General Assembly has dispensed with 
    the requirement of consulting the inhabitants of a given territory. 
    Those instances were based either on the consideration that a certain 
    population did not constitute a "people" entitled to self-determination 
    or on the conviction that a consultation was totally unnecessary, in 
    view of special circumstances. . . .
The pronouncements of the Court thus indicate that a norm of 
international law has emerged applicable to the de-colonization of those 
non-self-governing territories which are under the aegis of the United 
Nations. In this case we call for the immediate evacuation of the island of 
EnenKio by the United States Government and the return of the island to 
the Iroijlaplap of the Northern Ratak Atolls and the Monarch of the 
Kingdom of EnenKio, H.M. King Murjel Hermios. 
* # * # * # * # * # * # END OF DOCUMENT # * # * # * # * # * # *
Correspondence concerning this Notice of Accession or any other matter 
may be directed to the State Secretary, at the following address :
Government of the Kingdom of EnenKio Atoll
Post Office Box 8441
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 
96830-0441
In closing, the government of the Kingdom of EnenKio Atoll wishes to avail 
itself of this opportunity to renew to your Excellency the assurances of its 
highest consideration.
Cordially yours,
Cap'n Kermit Rydell
Jorge Garcia - 08/30/98 15:14:54
My URL:http://www.xchange.anarki.net/~aberingi
My Email:aberingi@bigfoot.com
Comments:
Salud y Anarquia
La libertad no se pide. Se conquista
Ni Dios ni Patria ni Rey
abbie johnson - 08/14/98 03:52:55
Comments:
Visitor - 11/26/97 01:57:59
Comments:
This looks like it will be a great site. I cannot wait to come back and see more!