The Evolution of Partisan
Politics
|
Ruling Elite |
Oppositional Elite |
Major Party Issues Domestic policy |
Major Party Issues Foreign policy |
Issues Unaddressed by Major Parties |
|
First
Party System 1790s -1820s |
Dominant
Political Party:The Democratic-Republican Party displaced the Federalist
Party. Ruling Section: The "Virginia Dynasty" Economic base: tobacco, land, shipping Ruling ideology: opportunity, mobility, agrarian paternalism |
Major Oppositional Party: Federalists, after the late 1790s. Oppositional economic base: mercantilism. Oppositional ideology: traditionalism. |
Federalists
favor central government involvement in internal improvements and imposition
of protective tariffs; Democratic-Republicans oppose them. |
Federalists
favor reconcilliation with Britain against the French Revolution; Democratic-Republicans
sympathetic to French Revolution and remain hostile to Britain. |
Slavery; aspects
of Constitution. |
Interim 1820-29 |
|||||
Second
Party System 1820s -1850s |
Dominant
Political Party: Democratic Party Ruling Section: The Cotton South. Economic base: cotton plantations and infrastructure linking them to the Transatlantic Industrial Revolution Ruling ideology: opportunity, mobility, paternalism |
Major Oppositional
Party: National Republican, then Whigs Oppositional economic base opportunity, mobility, paternalism Oppositional ideology: opportunity, mobility, paternalism |
National Republicans
or Whigs favor government involvement in internal improvements and imposition
of protective tariffs; Democrats oppose the specific measures raised. |
Democrats party
of "Manifest Destiny," expansion, Indian removal, war on Mexico. Whigs less
likely to initiate such things, but generally concur with them.. |
Slavery, expansion |
Interim 1858-66 |
|||||
Third
Party System 1860s -1890s |
Dominant
Political Party: Republican Party Ruling Section: The Midwest, particularly centering on Ohio. Economic base: Industry and railroad development. Ruling ideology: "Social Darwinism" |
Major Oppositional
Party: Democratic Oppositional economic base: Agrarian, small scale industry, and those larger scale manufactures disadvantaged by government policies. Oppositional ideology: Agrarianism, some pro-regulatory reformism. |
Republicans
subject priorities of the central government to the promotion of industry;
the Democrats oppose them on some issues in some places. |
Part of the
promotion of industry is the subjugation of the unsettled western territories
internal to the US; Democrats have some mild interest in Latin America, the
Republicans in Asia, these converging at the close of this period in the Spanish-American
War.. |
The bipartisan
abandonment of Reconstruction and the assumption that what was good for privately
owned industry was good for the nation.. Rise of mass circulation newspapers,
news syndicates and services with rising costs restricting diversity. |
Interim 1896-1901 |
|||||
Fourth
Party System 1900s -1930s |
Dominant
Political Party: Republican Party Ruling Section: The Northeastt Economic base: Finance, Management Ruling ideology: "Progressivism" as political manifestation of "scientific management" |
Major Oppositional
Party: Democrats Oppositional economic base: Agrarian and big city machines. Oppositional ideology: Both traditional Democratic approaches and, in the cities, an emerging Progressive current. |
Progressives
who favor government action to regulate economic institutions; the current
has growing power within both parties. |
The expansion of America's role in the wake of the Spanish-American
War, the "Big Stick in the Western Hemisphere and involement in Europe's
"Great War," creating a backlash of "isolationism" in their wake. |
Racial inequality;
the priority of capitalist interests in formulating policies; the changing
nature of the family and women's rights. New politics driven by mass media,
which includes radio as well as newspapers. |
Interim 1931-36 |
|
||||
Fifth
Party System 1930s -1960s |
Dominant
Political Party: Democratic Party Ruling Section: The Northeastern power base. Economic base: Finance, management Ruling ideology: a particularly aggressive "scientific management". |
Major Oppositional Party: Republicans Oppositional economic base: old elites. Oppositional ideologies: "Liberty League" conservatives, the more conservative of the old Republican "Progressives," and rural/small town isolationists. |
The Democrats
sought to increase the role of the central government in regulating large
commercial and industrial concerns to match its role in promoting those concerns,
as successfully established by the Republicans. |
The ascendancy
of Italian fascism and German Nazi-ism in Europe and of Japan in Asia leads
to the Second World War. Division among the victors in that conflict leads
to the "Cold War". |
The goals of
expanding government authority in economic affairs; the purposes of American
military involvement in the world.. Mass media expands into television with
globalization through satellite and other technologies., with costs continually
rising. |
Interim 1963-72 |
|||||
Sixth
Party System 1970s -2000s |
"Independent" as largest category in general; those
voting disproportionately tending to be conservative. Dominant Political Party: Republican "Sun Belt" elites. Democrats retain the majority of those expressing party preferences; those voting tend to be conservative Ruling Section: The "Sun Belt" Economic base: petrochemical, "defense" Ruling ideology: corporate mysticism, "Cowboy Capitalism," resurgent Fundamentalism. |
Major Oppositional
Party: Although most who identify with a party are "Democrats," the ranks
have drifted from the polls and the leaders to nonopposition. Oppositional economic base: new technologies Oppositional ideology: libertarianism, environmentalism |
Foster maximized
corporate profits, largely through the export of America's industrial base. |
Related to
domestic goals, "national security" has become global; a "Cold War" continues
without the ideological justifications. |
Environmental, older agendas on civil rights, women's rights, polarization of wealth and power. Deregulartion of media leads to spiraling increase in profits, reflected in unprecedented increase in the price of electoral participation. |
Interim 2001? |
|||||