DEPARTMENT OF THE
ARMY
44th Military History Detachment
199th Infantry Brigade (Sep) (Light)
APO San Francisco 96279
24 Jun 1967
AVBH-MH
SUBJECT: Interview with Major Dennis
F. Hightower
Office, Chief of Military History
Department of the Army
Washington, D.C. 20315
1. An interview with Major Dennis F.
Hightower, Brigade S-2, 199th Infantry
Brigade (Sep) (Light) was taped on 24
June 1969. The tape, which has no
restriction on its use but is classified
CONFIDENTIAL, is enclosed (Inclosure 1).
2. The interview was conducted at Fire
Support Base Blackhorse (Coordinates YS
440970) in Long Khanh province, Republic
of Vietnam. The recorder utilized was a
National RQ-1585 at 3 3/4 inch per
second. Length of the interview is
approximately 50 minutes.
3. A list of proposed questions and a
synopsis of Major Hightower's responses
are attached as Inclosures 2 and 3.
|
s/James
G. Lindsay
JAMES G. LINDSAY
1LT, Infantry
Commanding |
QUESTIONS FOR INTERVIEW WITH MAJOR
DENNIS F. HIGHTOWER
1. There are two principal
intelligence activities in the Brigade,
the S-2 Office and the 179th Military
Intelligence Detachment. Just what is
your relationship or division of labor?
Could this be improved in any way?
2. What have been your most important
sources of intelligence other than elint
methods?
3. Do you receive much intelligence
from ARVN intelligence sources? From
other RVN agencies (NP)? From civilians
(rural and urban)? Notable examples? From
on-post workers?
4. Can you describe your
counterintelligence organization?
5. Have you had many instances of
sabotage or espionage here at Camp
Frenzell-Jones? Could you discuss a few
of them?
6. Have you had any notable
intelligence successes? Failures? To what
do you attribute them?
7. Have you come against any unusual
problems as the Brigade S-2? Describe and
tell how you solved or attempted to solve
them.
8. Do you have sufficient personnel
and equipment by TOE to accomplish your
mission? How have you modified your TOE
in actual practice?
9. Do you find that replacements are
generally well trained for their jobs or
do they require extensive OJT to perform
their jobs?
10. Have you placed any new emphasis
on any facet of the S-2 function?
Downgraded any facets?
11. Have you made any policy changes
or revisions in SOP's during your time at
S-2, why?
12. What restrictions do you wish to
place on this interview? What security
classification and downgrading
instructions?
SYNOPSIS: Major Dennis F.
Hightower, Interviewed 24 June 1969 by
44th Military History Detachment, 199th
Infantry Brigade (Sep) (Light), APO SF
96279.
The S-2 is responsible for all
intelligence operations while the 179th
Military Intelligence Detachment (MID)
provides specialized support to the S-2
and serves as the operating arm or
executive agent of the S-2. During the
past two years the S-2 and 179th MID have
refined their operations to the point
that I am unable to suggest any changes
in their present relationship.
The 179th MID is probably the best in
Vietnam, principally because its members
have repeatedly extended their tours. The
ARVN MID has also been of great value
particularly in the area of order of
battle.
All sources of intelligence are
important, none above others, but the
most productive for us have been agents
and informants. We do not have access to
many of the sources of RVN intelligence
but the RVN people do make the
information from these sources available
to us.
Random questioning of civilian workers
and a limited number of informants among
them provide the necessary degree of
security for Camp Frenzell-Jones.
Basically our counterintelligence
activities fall under three headings:
base security, special operations and
document security. We have had no known
instances of sabotage or espionage at
Camp Frenzell-Jones.
I've had no unusual problems during my
tour—to the contrary, I've had
considerable cooperation. With regard to
personnel the S-2 TO&E is
insufficient but the equipment allowances
are satisfactory. What has happened is
that the S-2 has been assigned extra
functions without a corresponding
authorization for personnel. The S-2
replacements tend to require on-the-job
training but this is not so in the MID.
I have placed a greater emphasis on
liason [sic] with the units in the
field and with the ARVN's. There were few
policies in being when I took over the
S-2 function. The Kit Carson program has
been more formally defined and organized
for instance. Weekly meetings of the
Brigade and Battalion S-2's are now being
held. Due to the rapid turn over of
personnel here I have instituted a
quarterly (rather than semi-annual)
inspection of records.
In conclusion I have both enjoyed and
learned from my experience in combat
intelligence work, even though strategic
and area intelligence is my primary
field.
|