New Heart Therapy

More!

New Heart Therapy Program


A more aggressive and comprehensive management program for heart failure can reduce hospital admissions by 85% in patients waiting for a heart transplant, a new study suggests. The more comprehensive treatment may not only improve the quality of life for patients, but also saves money.
An estimated 400,000 to 800,000 people in the U.S. have severe heart failure, and 200,000 people die of the disease each year, according to the report in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Congestive heart failure is an inability of the heart to pump blood, resulting in a buildup of fluid in the lungs and elsewhere in the body. It accounts for about 1 million hospital admissions annually. "The average cost per hospital stay is $9,000, so half of this rate could represent up to a $4.5 billion reduction in costs," reported lead study author Dr. Gregg Fonarow, of the Ahmanson University of California at Los Angeles Cardiomyopathy Center.
The new study included 214 patients who were candidates for heart transplant. Over a six- month period, the patients had a total of 429 hospital visits - an average of two visits per patient. Fonarow and colleagues used a more aggressive heart failure treatment program, nearly doubling the patient's dosage of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, a drug that reduces the workload of the heart. And they adjusted the dose of diuretics - drugs that help reduce fluid in the body - as well as counseled the patients about diet and exercise. In the next six months there were only 63 hospital readmissions in the study group of patients, though 9 patients died, 14 underwent an emergency heart transplant and 12 had an elective transplant - not unexpected in a group of patients who were seriously ill and at risk for sudden death. The patients who did survive showed an improvement in "functional status," that is, their heart was functioning better and they showed an increased ability to exercise. "During the six months, only 26% of the 214 patients required hospital admission, compared with 92% in the previous six months," the authors wrote. "The estimated savings in hospital readmission costs after subtracting the initial hospital costs for management was $9,800 per patient." A program specifically geared towards managing heart failure is more likely to use the most up-to- date procedures to treat patients. Otherwise, physicians unfamiliar with the medication and dosage required to treat heart failure may be less aggressive with available treatments.
A second study in the same issue of the journal appears to bolster that theory. Patients treated by general physicians initially spent less time in the hospital and had fewer diagnostic tests but ultimately were 1.7 times more likely to require readmission to the hospital compared with heart failure patients treated by a cardiologist. This was true even though the cardiologists tended to treat patients that were sicker than those seen by a generalist, according to the study of 298 patients. The findings suggest that cardiologists should be involved in caring for patients with congestive heart failure, concluded lead author Dr. Steven Reis, of the cardiology division at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pennsylvania. "However, our results also suggest that congestive heart failure treatment guidelines need to be more uniformly applied by all physicians caring for patients with heart failure," he concluded.

SOURCE: Journal of the American College of Cardiology (1997;30:725-732, 733-738)

Return to Page 3