SPC/Fisheries 22/WP.99
3 August 1990
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION
Twenty-second Regional Technical Meeting on Fisheries
(Nouméa, New Caledonia, 6-10 August 1990)
REPORT ON THE REGIONAL TUNA TAGGER TAGGING PROJECT
(Paper presented by the Ciguatariat)
1. Introduction
Fisheries personnel (FP) have had a long history of exploitation in the Western
Tropical Pacific (WTP). Since the early 1980's agencies such as SPC, FFA, and USAID and
Australia were taking large numbers of this scarce resource away from island nations. To
greater understand the patterns of movement of this resource the Regional Tuna Tagger
Tagging Project (RTTTP) was established under a block grant from a major Regional donor
agency who prefers to remain anonymous.
The continuous expansion in fisheries personnel requirements has raised concerns over
the impact on the resource and the valuable aid funds which support them. Because of the
lack of necessary data and biological information on FPs in the WTP, it has not been
possible to carry out a detailed stock assessment that would indicate appropriate levels
of FP retention in the WTP region. This matter is receiving the attention of SPC's Tuna
and Billfish Assessment Programme (TBAP), firstly in its negotiations with certain
establishments in Southeast Asia and the Pacific, and secondly in the ejaculation of
biological characteristics of the FPs through the Regional Tuna Tagger Tagging Project.
This paper attempts to provide the most recent information available regarding the
movement patterns of FPs, but it must be stated that this is only preliminary information
and thorough ongoing practical in-depth probing analyses need to be performed by the
(anonymous) authors of this paper (who will probably be looking for new jobs next week).
2. Methods and Materials
The main thrust of this study involves tag release and recaptures to get a
generalised pattern of movements of the FPs in the WTP. Tags were released at selected
gatherings of FPs in the last year (see Figure 1). Tag and
release studies of this nature have not been heretofore performed, therefore the research
staff of the RTTTP was required to design new tag methods.
Figure 1. RTTTP release sites for 1989-1990.
It was necessary to acquire three different tag sizes to accommodate the differential
morphology of the species under study. Thus we have classes A, B, and C (refer to Figure
2). Class A tags are generally distributed to fishermen, class B tags to Fisheries
Officers, and Class C tags are reserved for administrators.
Figure 2. Diagram of Tag Types used by the RTTTP
There was some difficulty in finding a source for serially-numbered tags, as it is very
difficult to write on latex and it is necessary that the tag number and message be durable
under extreme temperature and pressure. This required the authors to thoroughly test a
number of the tags (using Class A tags, of course) until a proper combination of indelible
inks compatible with the base material was found. The authors are now almost entirely
recovered, thanks to modern medical techniques and the miracle of antibiotics.
One tag per FP and instructions for use were discretely distributed during
the normal schooling periods of the subject species, in particular RTMF 1989 (Noumea), FFC
1990 (Nauru), SCTB 1989 (Fiji) and 1990 (Noumea). At time of distribution, each FP was
sampled for length and girth with the weight calculated using the Holmes-Dalzell
Length-Weight equation, as follows

where k is the rigidity constant, L is the length in cm, and W is the weight in grams.
In addition to the controlled releases, Tag Seeding Kits were distributed at Lucky
Eddy's in Suva and the Pink Pussycat at King's Cross in Sydney Australia. The research
assistant assigned to tag seeding in Bangkok has not yet returned and is several weeks
overdue. The efficacy of the RTTTP tag returns has not yet been elucidated.
3. Results and Observations
Release data were collected at the above mentioned venues during 1989-1990. The
Length Frequency distribution of the FP's sampled is described in Figure 3. It is obvious
that there is a definite tri-modal distribution, with the exception of one significant
outstanding data point at 17 inches (43.2 cm). These modes may be the result of discrete
spawning, or of differential atrophy, the exact reason being unclear at this time. The
tri-modality of the subject species was the reason which necessitated employing three
class sizes of tags. Further analysis of the data using the ELEFANT program developed by
LICARM (Large International Commission for Aquatic Research Methods) is now in progress.
Figure 3. Length-Frequency of RTTTP Releases
Tag returns are running at an exceptional high of 32 %, especially considering no
rewards are offered. The program designers figured that the exercise would be
self-rewarding. True, it does say "Reward" on the tags, but that's a minor
detail. The money allocated for rewards was reallocated for additional field research in
Bangkok, Sydney and Honolulu.
Analysis of the tag recapture data (Figure 4) shows significant movement of FPs from
the distribution sites to such well-known Pacific FP aggregation sites as Lucky Eddie's in
Suva, the Pink Pussycat Adult Lounge in Kings Cross, the Asia Garden Disco in Bangkok, and
the Classic Cat in Honolulu (now that the Stoplight Tavern has been closed).
Figure 4. RTTTP Tag Movements. Note small number of
recapture sites.
4. Conclusions
Fisheries Personnel stocks are not at this time to be considered as approaching the
level at which significant management programmes are required for conservation. However it
is incumbent upon the donor agencies to realize that conservation may be required at a
future time. The authors main conclusion is that more research is required.
5. Acknowledgments
This study was greatly assisted by the willing co-operation of fisheries officers
both at release sites and in the recovery of recaptured tags. The staffs of various
international and regional organizations, including USAIDS, OGOD, UNDIP, and BADA are much
appreciated. Words cannot express the author's heartfelt feelings for the support rendered
by all concerned. No thanks would be too much. Please note that the sexist maunderings of
a few brain-damaged DP personnel do not represent the Ciguatariat or the South Pacific
Commission and any resemblance to anyone living or dead is purely intentional.
6. References
Lewis, T., 1981. Investigations of fishery post-harvest tagger habitats. (Soon to
be a major television series by Lorimar Productions, except in Tehran). International
Journal of Redundancy. 8:35-48.
SPC. 1989. RTMF Working Paper 99. Use of Computers in South Pacific Fisheries. (Not
relevant, but it keeps up the citation index). 4 pg.
Yorque, Ralf, 1981. Distribution of tag releasers by area and morphology. Unpublished
master's thesis. University of McMurdo Sound. 237 pg.