Elkind, D. (1996). Viewpoint. Young children and technology: A
cautionary note. Young Children, 51(6), 22-23
Elkind (1996) cautions readers that using computers may mask children’s
level of cognitive understanding. He urges a balanced approach with
developmentally appropriate practice.
Healy, J. M. (1999). The mad dash to compute. The School
Administrator Web Edition Retrieved October 11, 2002 from http://www.assa.org/publications/sa/1999-04/healy.htm.
Healy (1999) says that many programs suffer because of beefed-up
technology budgets and lists some trade-offs that come as a result.
- Haste and pressure to for electronic glitz
- Money on hardware, software and networks instead of essential
teacher education.
- Technology coordinators without adequate preparation in education.
- Cuts in vital areas used to finance technology purchases
- Pie-in-the-sky assumptions.
- Installing computers instead of reducing class size.
- Funding electronic glitz instead of quality early childhood
programs.
- Time wasted vs. productive learning.
She continues by adding that the slogan that says that kids need
computers to prepare them for the future is a poor guarantee of a bright
future for today’s students. By the time they get a job, the technology
of today will have been replaced with the technology of tomorrow.
Dillon, M. (2001). Smart alecs. Retrieved October 11, 2002 from
http://www.thetechmag.com/articles/2001/04/f_education.shtml.
Dillon (2001) writes of Healy’s research. Healy says that if the
wrong software is used too much, it will reduce a child’s creativity and
imagination and also shorten the child’s attention span.
Bennetts, L. (n.d.). Do computers make kids smarter? The answer may
surprise you. Retrieved October 11, 2002 http://www.k12.hi.us/~lachang/tethree/skills/White%20Papers/scomp.htm.
Bennetts (n.d.) writes that Haugland believes that classroom activities
have to complement the computer content. Healy believes the 4th
or 5th grade is an ideal time to introduce technology.
Haugland, S. (2001, August 2). Pros and cons of computer kids: Sue
Haugland response. Message posted to http://ericps.crc.uiuc.edu/naeyetec/old/Aug2001/0018.html.
Haugland (2001) defends her research. She states that her research
found that if children used non-developmental software with a year’s
exposure, the children demonstrated 50% losses in creativity. |