BOOK
REVIEW
Why
do the Poor Remain Poor?
Words Like Freedom: The Memoirs of an Impoverished
Indian Family 1947-1997, by Siddharth Dube, Harper Collins 1998, 257pp,
Rs.150,
After fifty years of independence, parliamentary democracy,
constitutional commitments, economic growth, and poverty alleviation schemes,
why is it that abject poverty and desperation remain the defining facts
of life for the majority of Indians? In this book, journalist and scholar
Siddharth Dube seeks answers to this question by tracking the history of
independent India through the eyes of Ram Dass Pasi, a landless dalit,
and his family. To his credit, Dube uses an innovative method and
a skillfully argued text to pose some very serious questions. The
main shortcoming is that he does not answer his own questions adequately.
To the impoverished masses - people like Ram Dass
- who form the majority of India’s population, and who lived under
the terror of the zamindari system, it was exhilarating to be politically
enfranchised and have the right to vote after independence. Why then,
asks Dube, did these votes and this political democracy not lead to economic
democracy? The number of desperately poor people in India now equals
the total population at the time of independence. Why, in spite of their
sheer numbers, have India’s poor failed to make parliamentary democracy
work in their favour?
Ram Dass Pasi, born in 1927 to a landless dalit family
in a small rural district of eastern U.P, has witnessed the end of colonialism,
and the history of independent India from Nehru through Vajpayee.
Dube skillfully weaves the experiences of Ram Dass and his family, his
migration to find work in Bombay, his efforts to repay his father’s debt
to the landlords, to educate his children, and climb out of poverty, within
the larger historical narrative of political, economic and social developments
in the country. Under the zamindari system, some 80 percent of the
rural population of U.P. were poor tenants, sharecroppers and landless
labourers, living at the mercy of a few thousand zamindars, the most pro-British
segment of Indian society. Independence in that sense, kindled hopes
among many that political liberation from the British would also lead to
social liberation from the crushing tyranny and poverty inflicted on them
by their collaborators.
But, as Dube points out, the rhetoric of the newly independent
government, stepping into the shoes of the colonial administration, was
not matched by their actions. The abolition of zamindari, for example,
and land redistribution, which formed a central tenet of the Congress platform
before independence, has yet to translate into reality. Even after
acts were passed in parliament to abolish zamindari, he says “of U.P.’s
rural population of 50 million people, the poorest half to two-thirds were
left as bereft of cultivable land as earlier.”
In this way, he follows the life of the family through
the Nehru era of the 1950s, through Gharibi hatao of the 1970s, the “poverty
alleviation” schemes of the Rajiv Gandhi era, and the globalisation of
the 1990s. Baba ka Gaon, Ram Dass's village in Pragapgarh district,
is a much different place in 1997 than it was in 1947. Yet, in 1999,
government data confirmed that the proportion of “absolutely poor people”
in the country had stagnated, and their numbers had increased despite a
decade of record economic growth. For Ram Dass’s family, “the past has
been brutally harsh, the present is precarious, and the future shows no
hope of being better”.
The argument that Dube suffuses throughout the narrative
is that the poor have remained poor not merely because of the failure of
successive governments, or because of their policy failures (which are
many) – but because the poor have been powerless to effect change.
The poor have been kept away from power, he shows, by a variety of techniques,
such as the duplicity of successive Congress governments, the influence
of money, the way that underdog parties such as the Samajwadi party and
the Bahujan Samaj party have inevitably catered to privileged elites within
the lower castes, and the way caste politics has pitted different segments
of the lower castes against each other. He also shows that especially
in the case of local and panchayat elections, it is nothing less than naked
violence and police intimidation are often responsible for keeping the
poor silent.
But Dube is reluctant to do much beyond complaining about
the iniquities of the present, and this leads him into some very pessimistic
conclusions. Although he shows how historical circumstances and the
vagaries of party and caste politics have failed to create a pro-poor agenda,
he is unable to separate symptoms of the malaise from its causes, and can
offer little to suggest how this could be changed. Without this,
he is left to conclude (perhaps correctly so under the present political
system) that the poor will never be empowered, that a pro-poor agenda can
never arise, and that “India is destined to remain the land of hunger,
want or suffering”.
The strength of this book is that it explains the persistence
of poverty in India in terms of the issue of political power, and on the
failure of parliamentary democracy to empower the poor. But its shortcoming
is that while it points out that the system has not worked for the poor,
it does not seek to analyse the mechanisms why this is the case.
As such, it remains aloof from the cutting edge of the debate in India
for the past few years, which is discussing the renovation of the democratic
process through new mechanisms and a new political process that can end
the influence of money and muscle. |