 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
. |
QUEZON CITY: THE CITY OF SMILES |
 |
Beaming with pride, Quezon City Mayor Belmonte (center) fulfills his
"social contract" with the people. There was a point in time, however, when the city was broke and this was almost
impossible for him to do. |
.
THE ENDRIGA REPORT
REVITALIZING
QUEZON CITY
QUEZON City, the former capital of the Republic of the Philippines, is
the largest city in Metropolitan Manila in terms of land area and population, with over 2.17 million residents occupying over 16,000
hectares of prime land. Unfortunately, despite the vast resources, there was a point in time when it was not at all a viable locality.
This was the predicament we faced when the present dispensation took
over the reins of government. At the onset, the Belmonte administration inherited claims for payment amounting to P1.4 billion and bank
debts amounting to P 1.25 billion, sustained by the past administration. and if that was not bad enough, claims raised by contractors, past
remittances due GSIS and withholding taxes due the Bureau of Internal Revenue or BIR that date as far back as 1995, payment due garbage
haulers and equipment rental companies to the tune of P560-million, unpaid police allowances, claims without proper appropriations or those
not even recorded in the city's book of accounts = stared us squarely in the eyes, demanding immediate solution.
Well, rather than buckle down to pressure, we got down to brass tacks
instead. To date, cash balance has reached a whooping P1,512,560,010,34 - translated into fiscal funds at the close of 2002. That's
unprecedented in the fiscal history of the premiere city. And all because e faced the challenge head-on, not shirked from it.
Despite the huge annual budget targeted at P5.175 billion for the year
2002, the Belmonte administration overshoot its mark by P226,990,168.00 - also unheard of before this time. Today, revenue collections total
to P5,401,990,168.23, broken down in Table I below.
. |
CASH COLLECTION
REPORT
As of December
31, 2002 |
Nature of Collection |
2001 |
2002 |
% INC
(DEC) |
City Share (Real Estate) |
722,437,380.95 |
847,964,966.22 |
17.38 |
Business Taxes |
1,209,965,603.97 |
2,467,209,132.59 |
103.91 |
Other Regulatory Fees |
77,500,489.93 |
149,967,822.26 |
93.51 |
Transfer Tax |
107,510,561.48 |
200,013,469.95 |
86.04 |
Amusement Tax |
146,400,840.57 |
131,480835.64 |
(10.19) |
Community Tax Certificate |
48,851,050.18 |
48,769,507.65 |
(0.17) |
Market Collections |
20,142,974.07 |
26,560,479.37 |
31.86 |
Miscellaneous |
2,730,446.49 |
6,666,668.78 |
144.16 |
Sub-Total |
2,335,539,347.64 |
3,878,632,881.46 |
66.07 |
Internal Revenue Allotments |
1,300,465,734.48 |
1,290,790,951.00 |
(0.79) |
IRA Contribution to MMDA |
97,716,000.00 |
126,564,000.00 |
29.52 |
Other Income |
47,929,204.93 |
106,091,335.77 |
121.35 |
City Collection Total |
3,781,670,287.05 |
5,401,990,168.23 |
42.85 |
Barangay Share (Real Estate) |
330,991,390.01 |
364,308,924.38 |
10.07 |
Special Education Fund |
626,228,233.67 |
721,696,806.89 |
15.25 |
Other Trusts |
39,564,876.97 |
65,517,016.03 |
65.59 |
Gross Collections |
4,778,454,787.70 |
6,553,512,915.53 |
37.15 |
|
TOP OF PAGE
One can glean from the hereinabove Collection Report that local
Revenue Sources increased from P2.3 billion in 2001 to P3.8 billion in 2002, representing a leap of 66.07%.
General Fund Collection for year 2002, meanwhile had reached P5,401
billion compared to only P3.7 billion in 2001 representing an increase of 43.85%. On the other hand, gross collection for the year zoomed up
to P6.55 billion in comparison to only P4.778 billion in 2001, marking an increase of 37.155%. |
. |
CASH REPORT
As of Dec. 31,
2002 |
FUNDS |
Gen. Fund |
Spcl. Educ. Fund |
Bgy. Trust Fund |
Other Trust Funds |
TOTALS |
Funds Available Today |
83,216,459.18 |
107,286,365.40 |
89,662,969.47 |
64,856,154.29 |
345,001,948.34 |
Time Deposits |
1,423,966,330.79 |
431,777,055.33 |
303,355,461.33 |
128,569,794.09 |
2,287,668,641.44 |
Cash in hand & in bank |
1,512,560,010.34 |
539,043,420.63 |
393,018,430.80 |
193,425,948.38 |
2,638,047,810.15 |
|
TOP
OF PAGE
We should note here,
nonetheless, that amusement tax registered negative 10.19% in 2002 owing to the fact that the city council enacted an ordinance reducing tax
rates from 30% to 15% for local movies, 30% to 10% for live performance of foreign artists and from 30% to a mere 8% for local
performing artists.
From the standpoint of sound governance, the Belmonte administration
considered the following as the most critical problems that confronted the city government upon assumption into office:
-
A negative P10-million general fund position
-
Low revenue generation
-
Dissipation of revenues due to corruption
On this score, we opted to innovate rather than procrastinate.
The first order of business was fiscal restraint. Apparently, the 2001
budget of P4.7-billion was ambitious and could not possibly be matched by revenue collection that chances of incurring a shortfall of
P970-million could be incurred. By adopting stringent belt-tightening measures, however, we managed to reduce the budget gap to less than
P100-million that within the first year of incumbency, the Belmonte administration wrote-off P900-million of its inherited debts while it
kept apace with current obligations.
The Belmonte administration stuck to its practice of:
-
Exercising prudence by making sure expenditures fall within given
budget
-
Validating all claims for payment, and
-
Applying strictly all laws, rules and regulations promulgated by the
Commission on Audit.
The new administration made sure that all bidding and canvassing
procedures resulted in least-cost alternatives that matched that of the most competitive prices found in the market producing quality goods
and services. The policy applies to contractors and suppliers with the view of cutting down cost by an average of 22%. To our amazement,
cost cut registered a maximum of 88% on some items on previous cost.
A no-nonsense monetary policy isn't all that easy, though. Especially
when it involves reducing the number of casuals on the payroll. But it had to be done. No use paying good tax money on personnel who don't
do much to serve the people.
All bad practices had to stop. So much so, we penalized persistent
delinquent taxpayers by offering their properties on the auction block. we also formulated systems that minimized the dissipation of
revenues brought about by some corrupt practice that, in the process, we uncovered the group of persons issuing fake receipts. The
culprits are now facing charges before the Office of the Ombudsman.
Another novel idea introduced into the system was the cross-checking
of transfer tax payments with the Registry of Deeds. Hereabouts, we hit pay dirt. We found out that 58% of those transactions were spurious.
Corrective and fail-safe measures had been adopted and are now in place.
Letters had been sent out to taxpayers possessing bogus documents with
the end in view of rectifying the records. The response to validate and straighten out public documents had been overwhelming.
Without doubt, a conscientious effort to raise taxes invoking the
laws, on the one hand, and showing compassion, on the other, proved to be a bonanza for the government.
So while we are strict on tax cheats and dodgers, we are lenient on
those who are willing to pay taxes without reservations - 10% to 20% discount to those paying annually; 5% to 10% to those paying
quarterly. Add the fact that we have built a taxpayers lounge for the comfort and convenience of taxpayers, no doubt citizens realize that
revenue-generation is not all about money, but public service.
With utter pride and
humility, and by the good graces of God Almighty, Quezon City now stands as the richest city in the entire country. No, we are not making
that claim. It's an honor conferred on our beloved city by the Commission on audit. And that means we have to work harder, not rest on our
laurels.
(Signed)
VICTOR D.
ENDRIGA
Treasurer
. |
 |
VICTOR B. ENDRIGA: Quezon City's "Fiscal Wizard" is Mayor Belmonte's secret
weapon.
You may correspond with the author through his
e-mail address: vendriga@info.com.ph.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
PREVIOUS PAGE | MAIN PAGE | TOP OF PAGE | NEXT PAGE
|