The criteria of the aesthetic
Over the centuries, there has been much argument on what can 
be called art, and what cannot.  Many people proclaimed all 
kinds of principles, but they were never comprehensive enough, 
to be universally applicable.  This lead to aesthetic 
relativism, denial of the very possibility of distinguishing 
art from non-art; some people believe that art is entirely 
a matter of opinion, and no objective criteria of art can 
be established at all.
Aesthetic views strongly depend on the economical and social 
position of the person and are subject to historical development. 
Nevertheless, there is a common core in all the diversity of possible 
attitudes, which makes them all aesthetic; however this 
"something" cannot be comprehended within aesthetics --- and even 
on the basis of human reflexion in general;  it must be discovered 
in praxis, creative re-production of the world, including 
both its material and ideal aspects.
In aesthetics, the aesthetic side of praxis becomes reflected 
in the aesthetic categories: beauty, mimesis, the sublime, 
the tragical, etc. However, neither of them is enough to distinguish 
art from non-art, and it is only the unity of all aesthetic categories 
that adequately reflects the specificity of syncretic creativity 
as a necessary level of the hierarchy 
of spirituality in general.
[General aesthetics]
[Unism & Art]
[Unism]
 
[Main sections]
[Page index]
[Keyword index]
[Search]
 
[Contact information]
[Guestbook]