|
THE 7 ESSAYS:
1
Reason as
Absolute
2
Safety in
Error
3
Happiness as
Moral Purpose
4
Selfishness
as Virtue
5
Capitalism Over
Self-Government
6
Non-Initiation
of Force
7
Democracy's
Adversaries
WorldCity Discussion List
This list attempts to apply knowledge in
economics, history, jurisprudence, political
science, philosophy, social psychology,
sociology, communications science and
management science to resolve problems of the
world community.
In matters such as financial reform, WorldCity
discussion supports the community-focused,
non-conformist legacy of statesmen such as
Thomas Jefferson against the opportunist
mimicry of corporate nihilism.
To subscribe to the list, send an email to:
WorldCity-request@list.to
with the word "subscribe" (without quotes)
in the body of the message.
See also:
WorldCity Essays
Discussions on World Economy and Finance
|
|
 bjectivists and those Libertarians influenced by Ayn Rand all claim Thomas Jefferson as their patron saint, as does every other political faction now-a-days, it seems. But some of the very basic premises of Objectivist philosophy vary significantly from many of the basic premises of Jefferson's politics. These differences suggest a fundamental incompatible, even though there are some selected statements by Jefferson that all Objectivists and Libertarians wholeheartedly embrace.
As with any philosophical system taken seriously by highly intelligent adherents, Objectivism is an intricate, complex set of doctrines that occupies the best mental energies of some very capable people. It begins with certain premises, and on those builds a highly intricate structure. We have no intention here of discussing all the ramifications of Objectivist theory. What we intend to show is that Jefferson's thought included some very basic premises that formed a foundation for a political philosophy which, while including some statements that are consonant with Objectivist beliefs, is nevertheless in overall and fundamental disagreement with their foundations. This is not intended as a critique or examination of Objectivist philosophy as a whole. It merely examines some of the fundamentals and attempts to show that an incompatibility exists at a very basic level. Hence, the basic premises discussed here are not highly abstract; they are instead simple, "self-evident" truths that can be appreciated by the mind of any thoughtful person.
Orthodox Objectivists -- those who adhere strictly to the original teachings of Ayn Rand -- do not treat Jefferson's thought as a complete philosophical system. Rather, they treat his writings as a resource from which they can extract a few isolated thoughts and use them to support their own positions. This causes them to ignore other thoughts of Jefferson that do not fit their purposes, and that put those more acceptable statements of Jefferson in a different light. But any thorough examination of Jefferson's thought will reveal that his statements are not just isolated ideas; they all fit together into a complete, interrelated philosophy of individual liberty and national self-government. All of his statements are built upon certain fundamental ideas, and derive their force from the basic premises that give meaning to the whole.
These essays will therefore focus on the differences between Jefferson's thought and that of Ayn Rand. There are people who call themselves Objectivists who do not adhere strictly to all of Miss Rand's teachings. Indeed, many feel that she was outright wrong on some issues and agree with some of the points made here. As a result, "Objectivism" means one thing to some, and another to others, and Objectivist thought becomes an uncertain target. But we here will be looking at what might be called "orthodox" Objectivism: Objectivism as taught by Ayn Rand and embraced by most of her followers.
Comments, questions and suggestions may be sent to the following email address:
Recently Published
New Book Completely Discredits
the Case for a
Jefferson-Hemings Relationship
Click here to read more.
|
