ProtoLanguage-IE-PrefixPlurals.htm

Tlazoltéotl

Prefix Plurals



by Patrick C. Ryan

(1/31/08)

The utilization of prefixes to form IE plurals is unrecognized at present for the very good reason that it is not very easy to analyze them from existing reconstructed roots.

However, they can be seen patterning with -r (from PL RE) in a significant number of cases.

The formant -r plays a modest role in Indo-European (except Hittite) as the -r of the neuter heteroclite -r/n declension (Brugmann 1888: II, 375-6; III, 103-4), where its principal use is seemingly to specify small indefinite amounts of items normally conceptualized en masse for the nominative and accusative, the uses in which this specification most likely would be desired.

Examples of the indefinitizing function of -r probably can be seen in:

1. with plural suffixes -



2. With plural prefixes:



Notice that in several of the examples above a plural formant begins the word; and the purpose of re is essentially to re-singularize the idea expanded uses can be seen in Hittite where, again, it is used to singularize: e.g. a-ni-u-ur, "performance", from a-ni-ya-az-zi, "performs" (*aniu-, "*things performed"); also in -Sar, -tar, -w/mar, -ttaraS).

3. In Hurrian and Urartian, in which it is much more in evidence, -r is seen:



4. It is in Elamo-Dravidian that PL re functions vastly more widely:



5. A residual appearance of, at least, a reflex of PL ¿a as a plural prefix should be expected in IE because of its definite attestation in archaic Egyptian nominals plurals in i- since both languages derive from Nostratic.



END OF IE PREFIX PLURALS













BIBLIOGRAPHY






the latest revision of this document can be found at

HTTP://WWW.GEOCITIES.COM/Athens/Forum/2803/ProtoLanguage-IE-PrefixPlurals.htm

Patrick C. Ryan * 9115 West 34th Street - Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 * (501)227-9947

PROTO-LANGUAGE@email.msn.com