



The Experience of the Factory Committees in the Russian
Revolution
The February Revolution
It was the working class women of Petrograd who sparked off the
revolution in February. After weeks of strikes with police attacks on
factories, the most oppressed part of the working class, the women
textile workers, took the initiative. Demands for bread and attacks
on bakeries were superseded by a massive demonstration of women
workers on International Women's Day. The women had ignored a local
Bolshevik directive to wait until May Day ! The early slogan of
"Bread !" was quickly followed by "Down with the autocracy ! Down
with the war !" By February 24th, half of Petrograd was on strike.
The workers did go to their factories, not to work, but to hold
meetings, pass resolutions and then go out to demonstrate. The Vyborg
committee of the Bolsheviks opposed the strikes: "(...) since the
committee thought the time unripe for militant action -- the party
not strong enough and the workers having too few contacts with the
soldiers -- they decided not to call for strikes but to prepare for
revolutionary action at some indefinite time in the future.''
[3]
Unaware of how 'unripe' the time was, the workers pressed on with
the strike till 240,000 were out. Strikers and demonstrators clashed
with armed police, and approached soldiers for support, above all for
weapons. The Bolshevik Central Committee finally got round to calling
for a general strike just as the already existing strike was becoming
an armed uprising. By the evening of February 24th the Vyborg
district of Petrograd was held by the revolutionaries: the police
stations were wrecked, and the police kicked out altogether;
prisoners were released, and contacts made with neighbouring
districts. The following evening the 4th company of the Pavlovsky
Regiment mutinied and opened fire on police. On the 27th workers
'visited' all the jails in Petrograd and released political
prisoners. The soldiers had already come over to the revolution, when
a single Bolshevik organisation produced an appeal to the army, which
didn't even urge the soldiers to support the workers.
The speed and success of this revolution from below took all the
socialists -- who had been propagandising for a revolution for years
by surprise. "The leaders were watching the movement from above; they
hesitated, they lagged -- in other words, they did not lead. They
dragged after the movement. The nearer one comes to the factories,
the greater the decisiveness." [4]
Instead of talking and writing, the workers and soldiers just got on
and did it. They started to set up their own organisations to meet
their needs. The socialists now found the workers behaving in ways
they hadn't expected. "The leaders of the Revolution also did not
understand that, once they themselves had invited the people to take
over local affairs, the people, who had had enough of being led and
regimented, would eagerly respond to the idea of self-government
through soviets, of ending the fighting; they would dream of a new
life." [5] The workers would now only
accept decisions from above if they agreed with them anyway. Faced
with the 'chaos' of workers acting for themselves, calls for
'discipline' resounded from the Bolshevik Stalin, from the moderate
socialist Gorky and from the patriotic anarchist Prince Kropotkin.
Similarly, the socialists did not listen to the demands rising up
from the workers and peasants. The workers called for an eight hour
day, an end to piecework, equal pay, an end to child labour,
improvements in safety at work and politeness from management ! These
early demands were a reflection of the desire to humanise work and to
give workers some dignity. The women workers likewise demanded equal
wages and better conditions and hygiene at work. The new
egalitarianism was also expressed in another way by workers: only the
present was of importance; no one could claim any kind of superiority
or priority by virtue of what they had done in the past. The slate
was to be wiped clean : when Khrustalev-Nosav claimed a seat on the
executive committee of the Petrograd Soviet on the basis that he had
been President of the Soviet in 1905, he was rejected with boos.




Notes
[3] History of the Russian
Revolution, Leon Trotsky, p121.
[4] Trotsky, p131.
[5] October 1917 - A Social History
of the Russian Revolution, Marc Ferro, p3.