This is the first message still accessible from the archives when listbot closed.

Date: 
                        Jan 04 2000 01:08:01 EST 
           From: 
                        "jeremy dixon"  
           Subject: 
                        Nine Star Ki? 


           Just looking through "Beelzebub's Tales" (Gurdjieff's opus) lately; and I 
           notice that he attributes the origin of the expression of the "law of seven" 
           as a "law of nine"; (ie the inclusion of the two shocks in the octave to 
           make 7+2=9) to Chinese "true scientists" (First chapter in book 3). In 
           Beelzebub Gurdjieff nowhere speaks of the enneagram directly, this reference 
           to the law of seven conceptualized as a "law of nine" is thus especially 
           relevant.

           While little in Beelzebub may be literal, I think that even less is 
           meaningless. Was Gurdjieff suggesting a Chinese provenance for the 
           enneagram?
Date: 
                         Jan 05 2000 23:06:15 EST 
           From: 
                         "jeremy dixon"  
           Subject: 
                         Re: Nine Star Ki? 



           Anthony wrote:

           ----------------------------------------------------------------
           The enneagram is a device to illustrate the law of seven AND the law
           of three and how they work together.

           Anthony

           -------------------------------------------------------------

           Yeah, but where were they first combined in a single symbol?

           Gurdjieff's "Beelzebub" went to the trouble of explaining where the two 
           shocks in the octave were first treated as points in themselves to make a 
           nine-fold pattern. He attributes this to two Chinese brothers, "true 
           scientists", as also describes their experimental apparatus in considerable 
           (and so far to me, puzzling) detail. Presumably he did not do this for 
           nothing; "Beelzebub's Tales" was meant to carry his teaching. This is the 
           closest he comes in "Beelzebub's Tales" to a direct reference to the 
           enneagram (although the laws of seven and three are of course referred to 
           elswhere in the book). I'm talking about the first chapter of book three 
           here.

           So...what is the significance of the clear implication that the enneagram 
           has a Chinese origin? Maybe he simply had in mind the Tradition of the 
           Prophet "Seek wisdom, even as far as China". Or maybe
           more is meant. In this connection it is worth remembering the importance 
           Gurdjieff gave to alchemy; and the existence of a very great alchemical 
           tradition in China, far more openly concerned with "inner alchemy" than 
           Western stuff. And in fact China is not so very far from Gurdjieff's known 
           and reputed stamping grounds.

           Sime time ago rosewood offered to post some stuff about the Chinese "Nine 
           Star Ki", my feeling is that this would be informative. There are some 
           aspects of Taoist thought which have strong parallels with Gurdjieff's 
           stuff, notably the place of sexual energies in making the soul and other 
           matters surrounding this.

           -J
Date: 
                          Jan 05 2000 23:57:59 EST 
            From: 
                          Anthony Craig  
            Subject: 
                          Re: Nine Star Ki? 


            Original message from: "jeremy dixon" 


            So...what is the significance of the clear implication that the
            enneagram 
            has a Chinese origin? 

            Well this is certainly an interesting angle and if you follow it up I
            would like to see what you find. However there seems to be every
            indication that the enneagram was first used by the Sarmoung
            brotherhood, which J G Bennett was convinced actually existed around.
            (See "Gurdjieff: Making a New World")

            I think there are also very few "clear indiciations" about anything in
            "Beelzebub's Tales;" Gurdjieff made a point of burying not only the
            bone deeper, but the dog itself. I have found reading Bennett's "Talks
            on Beelzebub's Tales" useful in this respect.

            Kind regards,

            Anthony
            Date: 
                          Jan 06 2000 00:55:16 EST 
            From: 
                          Anthony Craig  
            Subject: 
                          Re: Correspondences 


            Original message from: "jeremy dixon" 


            I think you'll find that all the glands synthesize their own hormones;
            even 
            the thymus which last I heard produced "thymosin" (or the like) among
            its 
            other talents.

            Almost true; the exception is the posterior pituitary (which shares
            nothing of its nature with the anterior except position); it receives
            it's hormones from the hypothalamus, which may account for the Jovial
            being a passive type.

            I would have thought that the pituatory's  production of the "nursing"
            hormone prolactin was worth having a look at. 

            This comes from the posterior lobe and may also be why the Jovial is a
            "maternal" type, even the males.


            Anthony
           Date: 
                        Jan 06 2000 01:55:31 EST 
           From: 
                        "jeremy dixon"  
           Subject: 
                        Re: Correspondences 



           Anthony wrote:


           >Almost true; the exception is the posterior pituitary (which shares
           >nothing of its nature with the anterior except position); it receives
           >it's hormones from the hypothalamus, which may account for the Jovial
           >being a passive type.

           I'll hit the old physiology texts a bit before getting into this one much 
           deeper! Meanwhile...the same could be said of the adrenal cortex and medulla 
           couldn't it? That they don't have much in common besides position I mean. 
           Maybe it'd make sense to look at the hormones themselves more than the 
           glands, especially as different glands can synthesize the same hormone and 
           the same gland can synthesize a variety of hormones (and indeed the same 
           hormone can have a variety of functions, eg serotonin, norephedrine)?

           Or alterntively/as well take the physical site seriously and look not just 
           at the gland but also at the local nerve plexus ("the brain nodes of the 
           spine" as whatshisname called them) and other factors. Look at the "chakra" 
           in other words. I can't help but think that this would tend to de-emphasise 
           the distinction between the anteriors and posteriors etc (the thyroids and 
           the parathyroids for example).

           Luv, J

           NB This post was sent to "octave" apparently in error for "bodytypes" where 
           the post it was relying to was. So, I've cross-posted it.
           -j
Date: 
                        Jan 06 2000 21:44:53 EST 
           From: 
                        "jeremy dixon"  
           Subject: 
                        Re: Correspondence with Esquire 


           At home somewhere I've got an old "Esquire" article from the 40s or 50s 
           based on the same (questionable) psycho-physiology as the Collin system of 
           body types. Glandular psychology used to be fashionable between the wars.

           Anyway "Esquire" discusses the glandular types of women, describing the 
           physical mental and erotic characteristics of the thymic type, the adrenal 
           type, the post and anterior pituitary type and so forth. Its a jokey 
           article, obviously, but no more a caricature than the use bodytyping makes 
           of the same material.

           Interestingly, it makes no mention of a pineal type. In those years little 
           was known of the pineal gland and the hormones associated with it, notably 
           serotonin. Mainstream scientific research has since clarified the crucial 
           part of serotonin in brain function. Numbers of modern psychiatric drugs 
           operate by screwing around with serotonin in the brain. There is little 
           doubt in my mind that serotonin is closely associated with the "48" 
           vibration Gurdjieff is reported as being the level of the material of human 
           thought and the food of impressions; I don't have time to go right into this 
           at the moment.

           My present point is simply that it would be a pity to base too much on 
           outdated scientific knowledge. (Gurdjieff's stuff often seems to anticipate 
           later discoveries.) I'd be interested to hear what Anthony or others had to 
           say about the pineal gland.

           -J
Archive for Enneagram & Octave Discussion List: Message #124 

           Make this message hidden. 
           Show Extended Headers 

           Date: 
                        Jan 07 2000 20:36:41 EST 
           From: 
                        "jeremy dixon"  
           Subject: 
                        Re: Nine Star Ki, Fibonacci 




           Anthony wrote:


           "So...what is the significance of the clear implication that the
           enneagram
           has a Chinese origin?

           Well this is certainly an interesting angle and if you follow it up I
           would like to see what you find. However there seems to be every
           indication that the enneagram was first used by the Sarmoung
           brotherhood, which J G Bennett was convinced actually existed around.
           (See "Gurdjieff: Making a New World")"

           --------------------------------------------------------------------

           One significance might be that it worth looking at Taoist stuff for light on 
           the enneagram. The Book of Changes even. There's a lot of number theory 
           there.

           I doubt that the "Sarmoun  Brotherhood" is literal. "Sarmoun" means "Bee" 
           doesn't it? Isn't saying that one got one's knowledge from the "Sarmoun 
           Brotherhood" in fact saying that one got it the way a bee gets honey?. One 
           searches, one gathers, and one transmutates in ones own body......

           Speaking of number theory, I've been doing some interesting stuff with the 
           Fibonacci Progression. This pattern is ubiquitous in the natural world; and 
           seems to be just such a "global" pattern as the enneagram is claimed to be. 
           So the enneagram if the claims about it are valid must relate to the 
           Fibinacci Progression (which generates the Golden Ratio, just as an 
           indication of its importance). I've discovered some very interesting stuff 
           relating the Fibonacci Progression to the enneagram, coming soon.

           -J
Archive for Enneagram & Octave Discussion List: Message #136 

           Make this message hidden. 
           Show Extended Headers 

           Date: 
                          Jan 30 2000 13:04:18 EST 
           From: 
                          "rosewood"  
           Subject: 
                          .: Nine Star Ki, Enneagram- Reduction 


           Hi, I'm the culprit who mentioned Ninestar Ki-an old system of study of
           nine, a physical (psycological, mental?) progression of forces from one to
           nine or nine to one depending on the "season" in time. It is the magic
           square with the number 5 in the center and the other eight no.s arrayed
           around it ala a tick tac toe board such that addition of any three numbers
           accross, or vertically or diagonally add up to 15. There are also 9
           personality types associated with each number similar to, but different
           from,  the enneagram system of personalities. As of yet I have found little
           in common with the Enneagam system which has no center number. We do not
           know the origin of any of these systems but perhaps it doesn't matter. Human
           Beings have been on this planet a long time and maybe they were more
           developed than we are led to believe. Nine Star Ki, like the Enneagram, can
           be applied to a myriad of ideas. Timewise, each year progresses in
           descending order through the nine star numbers(until year 2030 when the
           progression will reverse). The I Ching may be based on this system(or
           vice-versa).The Fibonacci Progression comes into play when translating the
           correct ninestar year from our 10 based calendar. The Fibonacci Progession
           is very old and simply may be referred to as "reduction" as it is a system
           of translating the decimal(ten) based system into nine. Our decimal system
           can just keep rolling up to infinity. In the nine based system there are
           only nine single digit numbers, so our infintely expanding calendar must be
           reduced to a single digit (1-9). The enneagram system "sort-of" alludes to
           this by calling the whole circle ten(or zero). Until I understand more, in
           my opinion, the nine-star system attemptes to explain the universe(s) flow
           of energy(laws) from the "ground up" so to speak, while the Enneagram
           attempts to explain the same from the "top down" so to speak. It "inner
           calms" me for the moment to see one as the inside of a helping hand, the
           other as the back of the same hand. Similar purpose, but not exactly the
           same. Perhaps each teaching will attract different essences or personalities
           to itself. Do you picture yourself on the Earth looking up to the heavens,
           or rather in the heavens looking down upon the Earth?
           In any case, if we are hungry, we eat.
           -Bruce

           >For an extensive page on the Fibonacci Progression (and the Golden Ratio),
           >see:
           >
           >http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fib.html
           >
           >This page is not "esoteric" but is written apparently for children so is
           >just about simple enough for me to mostly follow. Lots of animations and
           >stuff, both the striking mathematical properties of the Fibonacci
           >Progression, or some of them, and its widespread appearance in the natural
           >world.
           >
           >Finding the links between the enneagram and Fibonacci will tell us a lot.
           >(Extensive links _must_ exist if the claims of Gurdjieff regarding the
           >enneagram are even halfway true).
           >
           >Anyway, I'd be glad to hear how other people go with this. As I noted in
           the
           >preivious post if one reduces the Fibonacci progression (as in 13 "reduces"
           >to 1+3=4) then one gets a repeating sequence of 24 characters, (falling
           into
           >two obvious halves of 12 characters each).
           >If one draws this repeating sequence on the Compass (or "Celtic") Glyph of
           >the enneagram then one finds a certain figure that I will leave people to
           >discover for themselves.
           >
           >I expect further work to be fruitful, but meanwhile this is the only clear
           >connection between the Fibonacci numbers and the enneagram that I know of.
           >This has confirmed the importance of the Compass Glyph in my eyes, and have
           >for the first time realized a major significance of the sequence of the
           >Inner Hexagon around the rim of the Compass Glyph,ie :
           >1,2,4,8,7,5,1,2....
           >Of course, the sequence is the reduced form of the powers of 2,the
           ascending
           >octaves, ie:
           >1,2,4,8,16 (1+6=7),32 [3+2=5],64[6+4=10,1+0=1],128,256,512 etc.
           >
           >People may recall that the Compass Glyph looks like so:
           >
           >
           >                                  1
           >                                5   2
           >                               6  9  3
           >                                7   4
           >                                  8
           >
           >
           >The inner hexagram numbers are those not divisible by three.
           >Gurdjieff regarded the decimal system as being non-arbitrary...indeed one
           >might say in a sense that the decimal system "is" the enneagram. This side
           >of Gurdjieff's teachings always fascinated me. He recommended that we look
           >to popular sayings and idioms to find wisdom. Everytime we use our language
           >we are like children playing with gold-bearing stones. In much the same
           way,
           >we "work" the enneagram everytime we use the decimal system.
           >
           >Fibonacci himself, who lived in the 13th century, was a pioneer in
           >introducing the decimal "Hindu-Arabic" system to Europe.
           >
           >
           >
           >I'll get back to this, meanwhile some random thoughts....
           >
           >Looking at the numerals from the viewpoint of Theosophical Addition is
           >interesting.If we "reduce" the times tables we get, obviously, nine
           >sequences (remember that the sequence for 19 will be the same as for 1, 13
           >for 4, etc). All the sequences generate all nine numbers except for the 3
           >and 6 sequences (which only include 3, 6 and 9) and the 9 sequnce which
           only
           >inludes itself.
           >
           >So the Inner Hexagram numbers are distinguished form the Inner Triad in
           this
           >way, as well as being distinguished by the Inner Hexagagram being the
           >repeating decimal for 1/7. As well the Inner Hexagram numbers are the
           >reduced form of the _powers of two_, ie the ascending octave; and the
           >Compass Glyph gives shape to this property.
           >
           >Finally one obtains one of the Inner Hexagram numbers (ie *not* 3 6 or 9)
           >everytime you reduce a Prime Number. Is that interesting? I dunno, it
           >interested me.
           >
           >
           >Luv, Jeremy
ow Extended Headers 

           Date: 
                        Jan 30 2000 19:38:54 EST 
           From: 
                        "jeremy dixon"  
           Subject: 
                        Re: .: Nine Star Ki, Enneagram- Reduction 


           rosewood wrote:

           "There are also 9 personality types associated with each number similar to, 
           but different from,  the enneagram system of personalities."

           What, briefly, are these types of the Nine Star Ki?


           "As of yet I have found little in common with the Enneagam system which has 
           no center number."

           Well, I think (even leaving aside my interest in the Compass Glyph!) that 
           you can treat 9 as something like the "central" number in the enneagram. It 
           is the "do" remember....and for those who dig quoting scripture I believe G 
           was quoted by Ouspensky as saying that the 9 or zero point in a sense 
           represented the whole circle. The numbers of the enneagram pair off as  two 
           rows of numbers, each pair adding to nine, excpet for nine itself...and 
           other stuff like that...(If one doesn't leave aside the Compass Glyph then a 
           whole lot more can be said, but obviously there is no point pursuing that 
           right now!)

           "The Fibonacci Progression comes into play when translating the
           correct ninestar year from our 10 based calendar. The Fibonacci Progession 
           is very old and simply may be referred to as "reduction" as it is a system 
           of translating the decimal(ten) based system into nine."

           Just a point of semantics, the Fibonacci Progression does not in itself have 
           anything to do with reduction. The FB is the series of numbers:
           1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144.......
           which has some properties very interesting to mathematicians, an interest 
           apparently shared by God as She used the FB  in making the world.

           If one reduces the FB then one gets the repeating series of digits I called 
           the Fibonacci Pattern.

           In a sense the decimal system is based on nine! Zero is merely a 
           placeholder, not a number.

           I'll get back to this....but am aching to hear more about the Nine Star Ki!

           -Jeremy


           Our decimal system
           can just keep rolling up to infinity. In the nine based system there are
           only nine single digit numbers, so our infintely expanding calendar must be
           reduced to a single digit (1-9). The enneagram system "sort-of" alludes to
           this by calling the whole circle ten(or zero). Until I understand more, in
           my opinion, the nine-star system attemptes to explain the universe(s) flow
           of energy(laws) from the "ground up" so to speak, while the Enneagram
           attempts to explain the same from the "top down" so to speak. It "inner
           calms" me for the moment to see one as the inside of a helping hand, the
           other as the back of the same hand. Similar purpose, but not exactly the
           same. Perhaps each teaching will attract different essences or personalities
           to itself. Do you picture yourself on the Earth looking up to the heavens,
           or rather in the heavens looking down upon the Earth?
           In any case, if we are hungry, we eat.
           -Bruce
Date: 
                         Jan 31 2000 17:06:21 EST 
         From: 
                         Karl Starkweather  
         Subject: 
                         Numerological Speculation 


         jeremy dixon wrote:

         >
         > Finding the links between the enneagram and Fibonacci will tell us a lot.
         > (Extensive links _must_ exist if the claims of Gurdjieff regarding the
         > enneagram are even halfway true).

             I think we need to take a step back from this for a moment.

             The Fibonacci Progression, and the Golden Section to which it converges,
         describe one thing and one thing only as far as I am able to determine...the
         quantitative result of an octave of (living) growth.  Thus it can be found in
         everything from flowers to spiral nebulae, and is largely responsible for our
         subjective aesthetic response to natural beauty.
             As such, this has important implications for art, science, and even
         theology, but please notice that the Golden Section merely describes the
         external form of the octave.  In short, there is NOTHING ESOTERIC about the it.
         It reveals nothing about the inner workings of the octave except to serve as
         evidence of the type of triad on which the process was based (growth being one
         of the six basic triads).

             It is interesting to note that when Kepler was establishing relations
         between the musical scale and the orbits of the planets (demonstrating by
         implication that the solar system was the result of a living, creative process),
         he went out of his way to stress that none of the intervals could be arrived at
         through a division by seven, since such a division could not be constructed
         geometrically and the heptagon appears in none of the platonic solids on which
         his musical ratios were based (whereas the Golden Section appears in the
         pentagon, which forms the dodecahedron, from which all five of the platonic
         solids can be derived).  Yet it is this very incommensurable division by seven
         upon which the Enneagram is based.  This simple reality should tell us something
         about what the Enneagram addresses - it is hidden, and therefore esoteric.

             Mixing the esoteric and exoteric is, as I see it, a way of mixing scales.
         This cannot lead to understanding and I would urge people to consider carefully
         where our intellectual resources are applied, for the Formatory function loves
         games and puzzles, and will play with them until the end of time if we give it
         free reign without a little rigorous analysis once in a while.

             (Sorry to make my first post to this list so negative.  I think some of what
         has been presented here in the past has merit and plan to comment on it)