RAPTURE: FACT OR FICTION

Pre-trib View; What is taught and what scriptures say

This is one of the most controversial issues in the Christian world, and for good reason. This subject among others in the scriptures have been debated as to the interpretations of what the scriptures actually teach on these issues. We will look at the commonly taught views and what the scriptures say; do they agree, you can be the judge. With the amount of information on this subject ( in which volumes have been written) this will in no way cover all areas and views. With these things in mind, let's get into it; This brings us to a good question, where do we start?

The best place to start is with the title itself; Where does the word RAPTURE come from?

1. The word RAPTURE comes from the phrase "caught up" in 1 Thessalonians 4:17. Let's look at the verses in this text and the teachings surrounding them.

13. But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope.

14. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.

15. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

16. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

17. Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

18. Wherefore comfort one another with these words.

This is the text in which pre-trib believers say explain the rapture taking place. This is where I differ with them, and let me state some of the reasons why. First, the text is talking about those who have departed in the past and then refers to those who will be caught up following them. The subject at hand is the spiritual body being resurrected not the rapture. I know what you are thinking; I thought these were the same thing. Well, I did too for a long time, but I'm not so sure after considering this; all the saints that have died from the beginning of time until now are without their spiritual bodies, only their souls are in heaven according to verse 16. If you consider the parable in Luke 16: 19-31, we are given the impression that the souls of those past (Abraham and the poor man Lazarus) are in heaven, and then in 1 Corinthians 15: 42-54, which I believe (and most who hold the pre-trib view would agree) ties directly in with 1 Thess. 4: 13-17. Both of these sections of scriptures deal with the resurrection of the spiritual body. If there is not a rapture separate from what these verses describe, then could it be possible that at the rapture only the souls are taken and the bodily resurrection occurs at the second coming. Another possibility is that the resurrection spoken of in these verses and in Revelation 20: 4-6, cover a period of time from the rapture through the tribulation. With these things said, and I realize there are probably more angles to these verses, we will go on so not too much time is spent on one particular point. The purpose is just to take a brief look at the scriptures and compare what the teachings are concerning them and if they support these views.

2. On a more positive note for this view, let's look at Matthew 24: 36-44.

36. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

37. But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

38. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark.

39. And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

40. Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

41. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

42. Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.

43. But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.

44. Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.

First let us consider one important principle; when a story or text is used as an illustration to make a comparison to express a point or clarify a position, it is imperative to go back if possible and look at the story or text being used to get the proper understanding. With this in mind, let's look at the story being used in this text and make our comments accordingly. The text is Genesis 7.

11. In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

12. And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.

13. In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark.

Now having both texts in front of us, let's examine what is being said. Notice that Jesus uses the reference to this story, but not only that but let's look more closely at what is said; Jesus says in Matt. 24: 37-39, in vs. 37, that as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in his coming. Then in vs. 38, He describes that time and says things went on "until the day that Noah entered into the ark", and then again in vs. 39 compares it to his coming. Now if we look at the actual story in Gen. 7, we see that it is clear in vs. 13 that Noah and the rest of his family "entered" the ark the day that it started to rain. Taking the story into account, it was the flood that was the judgment, but it started with the first drop of rain. Using the comparison of the actual story with what Jesus is saying about when He comes, it is clear that it is at the start of the time indicated ( tribulation ). There is a common argument among mid and post believers that according to this story that they went "through" the judgment and were protected, which they claim is a proof that we will go through the judgment and be protected. There are several flaws to this reasoning; first, they (Noah and his family- representing the raptured church) were protected and went through this judgment for a reason, to repopulate the earth. There will be no need for repopulation after the rapture so this reasoning falls short to make it fit in this senario. If we look at some other factors we can see that this story does more to substantiate the pre-trib view; first if we look at the comparisons, Noah and his family were in the ark, which is a symbolism of Christ, and they are "in" the ark (Jesus) and not a drop of the judgment touched them, they were lifted up above the judgment and came back down when it was over. There is something else to look at in this section of scriptures, if we look at vs. 40-41 of Matt. 24, notice that it is described as though things are going on as usual and it is even more indicated to be that way in vs.38-39. The only problem with this for mid and post theories, is that it is hard to imagine that things would be going in this manner with millions being killed for refusing the mark and the war the anti-Christ will be waging against those opposing him, also those opposing him are not likely to be carrying on things as normal. It should also be noted that not ONE PERSON in Noah's family was harmed in ANY way while in the ark, so the theory of being protected through the tribulation is ridiculous and is not in any way supported in this section of scripture and not at all in the book of Revelation, especially chapter 13.

3. Let's look at Revelation 3:10.

10. Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.

First, the entire text should be looked at to get a proper understanding and an accurate assessment of what is being said. The seven churches being referred to in chapters 2&3 are the complete text to consider. There are several theories as to who these churches represent, one being that each church represents seven distinct time periods from the apostles time to the present. This view is only theory and even though the time periods can be made to fit, I don't believe it accurately fits the scenario, and I will explain why in more detail in the next section. For now let me explain my belief of this verse. The seven churches represent the church as a whole; If you were to survey the church worldwide, but especially in America, you will find people who fit each of the descriptions in these seven churches. Seven is God's perfect number and represents completeness, and if you go back and read chapter 1 it is very hard to get the idea that He is speaking to seven distinct churches and not the whole. The church has been plagued with the conditions described in these seven churches from the start and will continue to be until Jesus takes us home. Because these seven churches represent the whole, I believe the message is this; There are going to be false professors, lukewarm, and those who are in church for all the wrong reasons, but there are also going to be a lot of Philadelphia's in each church as well. Jesus said in Matthew 7:21-23 that not everyone would make it, indicating that these types would exist in the church, thinking that they were o.k. and they would make it just the same. He also says in the same chapter in verses 13-14 that there would only be a few out of the great numbers the churches boast that would make it. The church of Philadelphia is the only one of the seven that Jesus had nothing bad to say about, and this is the only one He makes the statement to of keeping them "from" the tribulation. This in no way indicates that this is done because of their "works", but I believe rather it is the result of OBEDIENCE to His word and an undying faith in Him. Jesus makes it clear in verses 8&10 that His satisfaction with them was in that they "kept my word". So who does this represent? I believe according to the scriptures that it is all of those who do everything they can every day to please Him and live according to His word: are they perfect? no way, but they love Him and have made the choice in their hearts to SERVE Him the best they can without wavering. They will still sin, make mistakes, and do wrong from time to time, but they hate sin and all appearance of evil and do not desire to sin nor continue in it. There is also the questionable word "from" in verse 10, those of the mid and post beliefs claim that this word means "through", I have put together a separate page of information on this very word and it's real meaning. The word in question is "ek", and is talked about in detail in the supplemental page titled "Preposition "Ek" means Out Of".

4. Now let's look at 2Thessalonians 2

This whole chapter deals with the events of the end time and the anti-christ;

Let's look at verses 1-8.

1. Now we beseech you, bretheren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

2. That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

3. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

4. Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.

5. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?

6. And now ye know what with-holdeth that he might be revealed in his time.

7. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

8. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming.

Take a close look at vs. 1 and it appears that Paul is speaking of two separate events; "the coming" and "our gathering". Then he tells us in verse 2 that someone had told them a lie that they had already missed that day, and in 2 Timothy 2:17-18 he tells us who those trouble-makers were. Then in verse 3 he reminds them of what he had already told them, according to verse 5. The falling away he describes in vs.3, I believe has been in process for several years already, many will argue that according to Joel chapter 2:28-29, that there will be a great revival in the last days. I don't disagree that there will be a spiritual awakening in the last days, but at the same time I believe that the falling away can and will happen at the same time. Let me explain briefly, first, a falling away is speaking of those falling away from the faith, and the pouring out of the spirit spoken of in Joel ch.2 is also speaking of those of the faith; the age of being lukewarm is desolving even now, but will even more so when the tribulation starts. So it is easy to see how the division will be made that some will depart from the faith and others will be revived. Now let's look at verses 6-8. There is much controversy as to who or what it is that "withholdeth", but one thing is for sure, according to vs.8. that what ever it is must be "taken out of the way". Some hold that this verse is referring to government as we know it, some that it is referring to authority in general. I believe it is clearly speaking about the Holy Spirit and will explain why: The Greek word for both "withholdeth" and "letteth" is katechon, this uses the neuter gender and corresponds to the phrase to pneuma "the Spirit", also in verse 7, the neuter gender is used to describe "he who letteth" , [ ho katechon], which is used in John chapter 14 throughout to describe the Holy Spirit and the Comforter. It is clear in verse 7 that Paul is not speaking of a departure of the Spirit, but that it is "taken out of the way", in the form of the restraining work of the church in the world. If it weren't for Christians in the world today openly opposing the evil in society, the devil would have control now. If the church is raptured off the earth, then the door is open for a complete rule of evil, allowed by God to fulfill the prophesied events.

5. Now let's look at Revelation 4:1-4.

1. After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will show thee things which must be hereafter.

2. And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne.

3. And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.

4. And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment; and they had on their heads crowns of gold.

There are several teachings on these verses, but the main view among pre-trib believers is this; In verse one, John is representative of the church and this verse gives us a picture of the rapture using the "voice as it were of a trumpet" to tie in with 1 Thess. 4:16 and 1 Cor. 15:52. I believe there are some other interesting points to discuss on these four verses. It is quite a coincidence that Jesus has just finished speaking to the church in chapters two and three and then starts chapter four by saying "Come up hither, and I will show thee things which must be hereafter". First in question is what was being referred to as "hereafter", hereafter what? It does fit the theory very well that he is referring to the tribulation period about to come upon those left on the earth; which I believe 3:10 is indicating the same thing. Now let's look at something interesting in verse four: If you will notice that now John is in heaven and in the presence of the throne and also twenty-four elders; these elders are believed by some to represent the twelve patriarchs or tribes from the Old Testament and the twelve apostles from the New Testament. It is also believed that these elders represent the church, both old and new. What I would like to look at is the fact that they are in white raiment and are wearing crowns of gold: according to many scriptures there is a specific day set aside for the rewarding of this crown, look at these scriptures; 1 Cor. 9:25, 2Tim. 4:8, James 1:12, 1 Pet. 5:4, Rev. 2:10 & 3:10. It is also important to note that there is no mention of this type of crown ( other than these same crowns in 4:10 ) throughout the rest of Revelation.

6. Now let's look at Matthew 24:31

31. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

According to mid and post believers, this verse in their thinking proves that the rapture is after the tribulation because Jesus refers to these people as "elect", and they say that can only be Christians. There is something to look at considering this; for one thing, every person who accepts Christ becomes one of the elect according to the following scriptures: Rom. 9:11, and Chap.11, 1 Thess. 1:4, 1Pet. 1:2, 2Pet. 1:10. There is also scripture that calls those who will be alive in the millennial kingdom elect.

SUMMARY

There are a lot of assumptions that are alleged by the mid and post believers against the pre-trib belief, but I would like to take this time to put into a small summary the way that I perceive this view. First let me say that there are many questions which will probably never be answered while we remain in this body. There are a few views of the pre-trib belief that I must disagree with. It has been said by mid and post believers that one of the faults of this view is that it is taught that "you will not be going through the tribulation, don't worry about it", causing laziness. It is also said that this belief is an "escape" from the tribulation, and that if we do go through it that it will cause a major falling away of these followers because of disillusionment. I strongly disagree with these accusations and strongly disagree with any who would teach such things. I believe that the only teaching, no matter what view you believe, should be to live for Christ every day the best that you can, because we are not promised tomorrow. We should be ready to meet our Lord at any minute; so regardless of the view we hold of the rapture, our lives and the condition of our faith should not be dependent upon which view is right. If we are living for Christ every day then it will not matter if we should go through the tribulation, because after all they of the mid and post views say we should prepare for this time. Unless I'm mistaken, if you are living for Christ every day, that is the best preparedness for any situation. There are some questions you can ask the mid and post believers: 1. One of the faults they claim to have against the pre-trib view is that they say there is only one resurrection and a rapture before the tribulation does not agree. QUESTION: I agree that there is only one resurrection but even at that there is a problem no matter what view you hold; the problem is this: according to Isa. 11:1-10, 24:22-23, 35:1-10, 65:18-25, Jer. 23:5-8, Mic. 4:1-8, Zech. 14:16-21, and Rev. 5:9-10. It is evident that there will be people alive on the earth during the millennial reign and they will even die during this time period. That being the case and their only being one resurrection, no matter if it occurs pre, mid, or post; what happens to these people if they have already missed the resurrection? The point of this question is to illustrate that there will be many circumstances during and after the tribulation which are unexplainable, so with that in mind why is it so hard to agree to disagree without causing division. 2. Another point of disagreement is in Matt.24:31, about the term "elect" which was discussed previous to this summary. QUESTION: I agree that the phrase "elect" refers to all Christians, but disagree with using that verse to say that the pre-trib view is wrong, according to the following reasons: according to Zech. 14: 19&22, these people in the millennial reign are called by God "my people" and in verse 22 God calls them "mine elect". If these people are considered and called "elect", who missed the rapture, then why couldn't the rapture happen before the tribulation, and all those saved during the tribulation be considered "elect" also? There are many other things that could be discussed and if you would like further information contact me any time. For now I must end this or else go on forever.

Adam Bartlett

PROOF JESUS IS COMING VERY SOON

BIBLE HEADQUARTERS