Son of a Bitch, goddamned idiot boy, Sudheer Birodkar pumps his pectorals, yeah, some asshole controlling sphincter muscles, them too and declares that his "His Story" shitstory site has been mentioned by none other than Encyclopedia Britannica.

Not too long ago this moron was selling a 150 pages book at $35.00 a pop extolling the virtue of Indian genius, perhaps such as him. The work was a classical cut and paste job. I have nothing against doing even that kind of filthy plagiarism for a cause. His cause was to offer canned version of selective material from the history books, reference books such as dictionaries and encyclopedias, already familiar to the history buffs and Brahmin bozos if they cared to shed some lead from their fat asses.

This deluded dunce stole material from any and all published or unpublished material and wanted to make a fast buck or two.

His publicity technique was also suspect. He would go on any related or unrelated newsgroups, including but not limited to the e-mail lists like Sanskrit Digest and repeat that message dozens of times. Moreover, he would mention that which English dictionary had what definition of common words and ask if anyone had a set of encyclopedias for him to browse to steal some more material.

There were many fine pictures in this Magnus Opus of this nincompoop. One I distinctly remember was of a Bamian Buddha. No credit, no acknowledgement as to the source of that picture. As if this bastard risked his life, entered the war torn zone of Afghanistan and shot the picture with his Twinkie Kodak camera.

The bastard gives himself credit as a Op-Ed columnist and mentions variety of Indian newspapers and magazines as the sole qualification to write history. Some fucked up feces fascist historian that he proves himself to be. His Atlanta connection is duly noted and the coconspirator in Atlanta is pinned down to a Brahmin mother fucker. Subsequently, he finds one Lamba hoodlum to either cooperate in his histrionic or mirror his site.

A known Hindu hoodlum, Atanu Dey came out with a glowing tribute to this common thief, a pretender, a fake historian of doubtful qualifications. This is how village idiots run their scams. Rascals have debunked practically all the established historians of repute and take their cues from the rascals like Dr. David "Frawd" Frawley and such.

At the lower end, Sudheer Birodkar tripe makes royal entry into royally screwed up bozoland of history challenged dumb asses. History is what it is and not what it is made up as. S Sadananda is not a historian neither is M V Kamath. Both are noted journalists and commentators.

S Sadananda is my brother and see how he manages to draw a true picture of the mindset of the deluded dunces like M V Kamath and Sudheer Birodkar. M V Kamath has managed to make an ass of himself by reproducing what is a known fact. The facts that he so proudly duplicates are either checked and assessed by many observers without making a beeline to the secret US documents. M V Kamath is a Hindu shit shoveling boy as good as or as bad as Sudheer Birodkar who use their selection as the weapon to establish some form of believability.

Be that as it may, calling Pakistan bad is slightly passe. How bad is Pakistan is of no consequence to the historians or even to the habitual white face liars like M V Kamath. The point is that even when they lie thru their teeth we can still find their true heinous nature as history ought to be impartial, at least as much as reasonably possible.

The deluge against Pakistan, Muslims of the world, American imperialists, British imperialists, Kashmiri terrorists and details of something that has no value, no relevance to the times such as this is not the way to assess the problems of India.

In the end Govindacharya and Ram Prakash Gupta are the people whose actions would influence the historic perspective when twenty years down some new budding historian would try to sum up what went in the year 2000. You cannot ignore the reality as the reality, as M V Kamath so glibly tells, comes out no matter who wants to or who doesn't.

Thanks to the Free Press Journal, the Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Times of India and India Today dated February 10, 2000.

Sid Harth..."For deluded dunce like Sudheer Birodkar fancy stories look like history because Brahmin mythology is taken as reality."

My good buddy, Krishna posted following article asking Sudheer Birodkar to clarify his suspect credentials to be a self promoting historian.

Dear Sudheer,

I have no intentions of tormenting you with questions about your academic credentials. Because we all know perfectly well that you don't have any.

But who knows; with assheads like Murli Manohar Joshi controlling/defiling our academic institutions, anyone - yes any village idiot with a Hindutva leaning could end up at ICHR (Indian Council of Historical Research).

B.R. Grover, one of those pseudo-historians with degrees from nonexistent universities was promoted to the Chair at ICHR a couple of months ago. Such insane appointments could only be carried out during a regime of barbarians. Take a look at Grover's bogus academic background compared to genuine historians:

"Further, in comparison to previous incumbents in the ICHR, such as R.S. harma, Niharranjan Ray, Irfan Habib and Ravinder Kumar, GROVER'S ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS ARE FAR FROM IMPRESSIVE. He has to his credit two articles in the Indian Economic and Social History Review - one on the village community published in 1971 and the other on land rights in Mughal India, published in 1976. And while he served for long as Reader in History at Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi, he has NEITHER A PH.D NOR THE TITLE OF PROFESSOR TO HIS CREDIT."

(Frontline; Nov. 13-26 1999)

Do me a favour Mr. Birodkar:

Please post A COMPLETE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SOURCES YOU HAVE MADE USE OF, TO THIS NEWSGROUP:

i. TITLE, AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER OF THE BOOKS YOU MAY HAVE QUOTED/USED AS REFERENCE.

ii. TITLE, AUTHOR AND DATE OF THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLES OR JOURNALS YOU MAY HAVE QUOTED/USED AS REFERNCE.

iii. PLEASE DO ALSO MAKE REFERENCES TO THE PAGE NUMBERS!

Just a comment to your first chapter titled "How Indians Lived During Vedic Times." Did you travel by time machine back to the Vedic era or did you make use of archaeological data or historical documents? I did bring up this issue, in a slightly polemical manner, in order to underline the importance of publicising bibliography of your sources. It's an ethical code every academic is obliged to follow.

I am not interested in WHAT you know. I am interested in HOW you know it.

Any imbecile is capable of memorising and retelling the history of India. Even my sister aged five knows who Emperor Ashok was.

I may also add that your pseudointellectual reflections on rationalism, humanism and secularism were a nice piece of mumbo-jumbo.

Kind regards,

Krishna

NDA's Criminal Connection

Thursday, February 10, 2000.

The news item says that "Lal" red in Hindi, "Kishen Advani" I like to call him as 'Lallu the criminal kallu' please don't ask me to translate that one got "red" face after he was apprised of the list of NDA, National Democratic Alliance, a fancy schpansy name for the feces fascist and bunch of power hungry local war lords cabal in Bihar list of NDA candidates containing hardened criminals.

Why would this criminal Sindhi, Lal Kishen Advani, home minister of India get red faced? Did he see the truth or something? As in wildcardindian, version 4.00 saw the truth? These bastards never get embarrassed, not even a wee bit. Lying, cheating, making up glory stories, denying the reality, spin doctoring that sort of thing is what Brahmins are known the world over for. Lal Kishen Advani may not be a Brahmin but sure he acts like one.

The truth, as if it were a two by four and strikes right in the middle of the bozos' eyebrows would not make any difference. The typical reaction of one Hindu hoodlum, "Norman Nailer," now in his latest reincarnation as "nn" refuses to see the truth of Deepa Mehta being mauled in Varanasi. After Madhya Pradesh chief minister offered her and her movie crew a safe environment to shoot the movie 'Water,' this shit shoveling boy called Digvijay Singh a dictator. How do you like such truth?

The truth is never accepted in a filthy and fake democracy called India. Bunch of sewer rats marauding as sole arbiters of public decency and morality take to the streets and make holy mess and mayhem of the laws of that land under the careful stage managed direction of the vilest Hindu, Brahmin Mafia, RSS, a true form of secret criminal society and a kind man like Digvijay Singh is declared as a dictator?

Thanks to the Indian Express dated February 10, 2000.

Sid Harth..."Please don't tell me that these are not the brain dead ding bats yelling and screaming about their holy Hindu land being attacked by Martians, Muslims, whatever."