In the context of Usenet, a troll is not something
that lives under a bridge and eats billy goats. The term is borrowed from
fishing, where trolling means to drag a lure behind a slow-moving boat
in an attempt to fool fish into thinking the lure is alive and therefore
good to eat. On Usenet, trolling means to post some comment that invites
foolish people (the "fish") to either fall for your painfully obvious
lie, or correct what they think is your error. Trolling is NOT synonymous
with lying, because anybody with a brain and a clue can detect a good
troll. Saying "I am a midget" when you're really seven feet tall is NOT
a troll, because there's no way for anyone on the Internet to know how
true or false that statement might be. Saying "Ricardo Montalban is a
midget" is a troll. Trolls are usually text-only, but I have achieved
some small success by creating quick and dirty web sites which I point
to as evidence.
This is just a rough guide to trolling -- there are many variations
on the theme.
My friend Kibo has this to say on the subject:
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo"
Parry) My strategy is to see how ludicrous I can make the trollery and
still have someone fall for it. For instance, "William Shatner owns six
pairs of green socks." isn't a good troll if he owns seven pairs. "Isn't
William Shatner a pair of green socks?" is a good troll, but ONLY if it
works, and generates one of the four desired responses:
LEVEL 1 TROLLAGE (GULLIBOZO, 100 points): "He is? Oh no! Now I'd
better tell everyone else I know who used to like him!!!" LEVEL 2 TROLLAGE (CYCLOPEDANT, 10 points): "No he isn't. I know
because he was on Star Trek last night and I spent six hours enlarging
every frame on my computer to look for green socks and you're wrong, you
must be stupid or something!" LEVEL 3 TROLLAGE (IMPEDANT, 3.14159 points): "I know this must be
an attempt to troll me, but I'll answer it anyway: No, he isn't. He is
a human being." LEVEL 4 TROLLAGE (OTHER, 1/2 point): "I don't know." The desired response to an attempt at trolling is *not* a flame.
Flame-bait is not trolling, and trolling is not flame-bait, although it
sometimes generates flames from those whose bullshit detector is connected
directly to the bullshit generator. Flames generated by attempts to troll
people do not affect your score. (true statement) "Nichelle Nichols on 'Star Trek' was dating the
producer, Gene Roddenberry!" Meta-trolls generate BONUS POINTS, doubling your score.
There's also the COUNTER-TROLL, which is the concept of parrying
a troll with another troll, often done by people whose bullshit detector
is connected to the trollerizer:
(obvious troll) "Major Barrett wrote every episode of 'Star Trek'
with his wife, Jean Roddenberry." If the counter-troll generates trollage, the counter-troller receives
double points, and they are deducted from YOUR score, you LOSER! Kibo is an interesting guy. When you're done worshipping me, go worship him at http://www.kibo.com. |