An Open challenge to Sankara Mutt (concluded)

108 Questions
To
Sankara Mutt

Your Aryan Purohit caste have written distorted interpretation to the Vedas compiled by Veda Vyasa, and to the other literature either compiled or written by Veda Vyasa. In order to hide the truth, you have passed a mandate through the rulers who were under your influence, that the Dravidians should not read, listen or see these literature. Could you deny this historical fact?
You have separated Brahma, the son of Siva from the Trinity Siva, Vishnu, Brahma, and twisted it into a satanic doctrine which is against Siva, by stating that 'I am God'. Thus the Brahman concept was perverted into a satanic doctrine, which is against God. Can you refute this?
So, a legend was created that the son of Siva, Kumarakkadavul (Murugan), imprisoned Brahman, who was diverted as the rival God. Can you deny this?
Can you deny this fact that another legend was created that Siva cut off the head of Brahman, and became 'Kapaleeswarar' since Brahman had pride against Siva.
So, the Brahmins who have 'Brahman' in their hearts, are against the Supreme God Siva and have brought themselves to the level of degrading Siva as the 'God of Sudras'. Can you deny this?
Hence a stage developed that there should be no temple or worship or religion for Brahman. This shows that there is no separate religion or worship for the Brahmins who say that 'I am God'. Can you deny this historical fact?
Could you deny the fact that your worship neither corresponds to your Vedas nor to the Dravidian Vedantic system? Also, are not lying and deceiving alone your religion and the way of life?
Since you have no separate worship or religion, you have taken captive the temples of the Six-fold religions with the help of the rulers who were deceived by you, and you have given a full form to the Varnashrama Dharma, the caste system based on birth, and coated the religions of the family of Siva (that is the Six-fold religions) with the Varnashrama Dharma concept like unwanted creepers on a tree. Could you deny this?
Hence, the Supreme court of India passed a judgement that the Hinduism, which developed on the basis of Six-fold religions, is not a religion but a way of life. Thus it separated the unwanted creepers (Varnashrama Dharma) from the tree (the Six-fold religions). Can you deny this?
You have separated Brahman, the son of Siva, from the Trinity of Siva, Vishnu and Brahma, and aryanized it, and then started portraying him against the Supreme God Siva, and began degrading Siva as the God of the Sudras. So, Murugan, Pillaiyar and Aiyappan, the Dravidian Vedantic son of Siva worship that developed in the different stages, had to oppose the Aryan Brahman. Can you deny this?
The Brahman concept which was devised by your ancestors against Siva, was defeated by the Visishtadvaita, the Dvaita and the Saiva Sittanta. Though you are aware of this fact, you continue to acclaim and propagate the defeated satanic Advaita doctrine, as per your usual treachery and political influence. Could you refute this?
Though the Saiva Sittanta, the Dvaita and the Visishtadvaita have totally defeated the Advaita, since these philosophies are under the fold of the Varnashrama Dharma, they are purposely oppressed and concealed by your political influence. Can you deny this?
Brahma who is in the Trinity concept, is the Kumarakkadavul (Son of God), the son of Siva, and in the concept of Kumarakkadavul the son of Siva, there is scope for soul and God explicitly. But Brahma, the son of Siva has been wrongly interpreted and twisted in order to make Brahman concept with no scope for the Soul and God, but only about spirit (life), and through this satanic Advaita doctrine which is against God and focused on spirit (life) only, it was treacherously devised to plunder others and enable the Brahmins to lead a worldly flourishing life. Could you deny this?
Sitting in God's temple and acting as God, and saying that 'I am God', is the 'Brahman concept' which opposes Kumarakkadavul (Son of God) and this satanic doctrine is totally against the Kumarakkadavul concept (anti Son of God), and those who follow the 'Brahman concept (Aham Brahmasmi)' are Brahmins, and the practice of this satanic nature is called Brahminism. It is Adi Sankara who gave full form to Brahminism. Can you refute this?
The Advaita philosophy devised by Adi Sankara does not contain any knowledge of the soul and God, but deals with spirit (life) alone. Hence it degrades from the level of human beings who have soul, to the highest one amongst the living beings, the level of animals which do not have soul but spirit (life) alone, and thus it is suitable to the animal way of life. Can you deny this? The Advaita philosophy is only suitable to a demonic state which opposes God, and to the state of animals amongst living beings. Can you refute this?
Can you refute the fact that those who have this doctrine which is suitable to a demonic state which opposes God, and to the state of animals, would oppose the Supreme God and lead an animal way of life?
Can you refute the statement that you are rendering a obscure explanation to the Sivalinga and degrading the holy Dravidian Saivite symbol, since you could not experience the Supreme God and understand the holiness of the Sivalinga, which is a symbolic representation to denote God and venerated by the Dravidian seers?
Since you are ignorant of the Supreme God, can you refute the fact that in spite of smearing the holy ash, a symbol of Saivism, you are indulging in an act of ignominy by pronouncing Lord Siva as a God of Sudras?
Will it be possible for you to refute the fact that thus by giving a disgraceful interpretation to the Sivalinga and you who degrade the Supreme God Siva as the 'God of Sudras', have enslaved the Six-fold religions based on the family of Siva and their temples, and through this you are not only enslaving but humiliating the Dravidians who are the followers of the above religions, and, when you smear the holy ash on your forehead, it reveals that you are acting to deceive and ultimately you are striving for the welfare of the Aryan Brahmins alone?
Can you refute the fact that since you and your followers could not know about God and the soul, you are worshipping the elements you know, the sun and fire, as god?
Can you refute this fact? "Since you do not have the knowledge of the Supreme God, you are deceiving us, the Dravidian people, by saying that the God in the temples of our Six-fold religions are void of having any power. And you lie and deceive the people by performing Yajna so as to transfer power to our God from you, a mere man?"
As one with the satanic doctrine which opposes God, can you also refute this fact that since the Dravidians permit you to enter into their temples they have forsaken their higher status and are living a life of slavery under you, and, consequently they are undergoing immense sufferings?
Can you refute this also? "It is the birth right of the Dravidians who happen to be the seers endued with bakthi and self-respect, to prohibit you from entering into their temple since you are the enemies of God, and in case you try to gain entry into their temple they should take appropriate steps to apprehend you?"
Could you refute that Adi Sankara while pretending to write an interpretation to the Bhagavad-Gita which has the doctrine of trinity, gave a full form to the Brahma concept in the Advaita philosophy? Thus, you are saying that Brahma concept is totally different from the trinity concept, and you degrade Siva as the God of Sudras and give a corrupt and immoral interpretation to the Sivalinga, and have enslaved the Six-fold religions of the family of Siva by amalgamating the Six-fold religions under the fold of the Brahman concept of Advaita, in order to plunder the Indian Dravidians through the ages. This is the combined satanic conspiracy devised by your Aryan Purohit caste. Can you refute this?
Because of this combined conspiracy, your Aryan Purohit caste have been plundering, insulting and degrading the Dravidian Indians, and through the ages you are enjoying all the benefits. Because of this, those who have had political and economical power in India through the assistance of this satanic doctrine are coming to your chief places, a nest of plunderers, and prostrating before you because of your position in maintaining this satanic doctrine without any consideration for your personal behavior in order to show their gratitude. Can you deny this?
You have been plotting against the three groups of Dravidian communities such as Backward class people who have been enslaved as Sudras, the Scheduled class who have been kept as untouchables or the Panchamas, and the religious minorities who were converted because of your oppression and making them to fight against each other, and through associate organisations like the R.S.S. and Brahmin Samaj you have been plotting through so many strategies to trouble, destroy and plunder the Dravidians in liberated India. This is confirmed by the secret circulars of these organisations which are found in the appendix. Can you refute this? (The link between you and these circulars had been explained in the book 'Why a Confrontation with the Sankara Mutt?', and it was sent to you on 27.3.1996 asking for your opinion. It is to be remembered that since you are not able to deny this fact you have been kept quiet.)
Can you refute that since the Kanchi Sankara Mutt is one of the plot hatcheries which has the bounded duty to conspire against the freedom struggles of the Dravidians, and through concealing, twisting, lying and plotting you have commanded the Chief Minister through the magazine 'Junior Vikatan' (23.6.1996) that the Dravida Samaya Marumalarchi Iyakkam (The Revival Movement of the Dravidian Religion) which is fighting for the freedom of Dravidians should be nipped in the bud? We have sent copies of the letter, written to you on 6.7.1996 explaining and exposing your plot and asking whether it can be refuted by you, to 'Junior Vikatan', and to the Chief Minister of Tamilnadu. Can you refute that the 'Junior Vikatan' has published this matter by correcting it's fault and you have kept quiet accepting your deceit without refuting it? (The letter dated 6.7.1996 is appended herewith).
When the Dravida Samaya Marumalarchi Iyakkam arranged for a prayer to God for the sake of the repentance of the Brahmins, instead of utilising the Brahmin Association you made use of Hindu Munnani Dravidians to oppose a Dravidian movement which is agitating for the liberation of the Dravidians. Since you could not oppose a racial struggle, you distorted the racial struggle and gave it the colour of a religious struggle between Christianity and Hinduism through a circular issued by the Hindu Munnani. Do these not amount to establish the fact that Sankara Mutt is a plot-hatchery? Can you refute that you have lost the right to enter into our temple since you were not able to answer the 23 questions sent to you in the letter dated 30.07.1996 with the caption 'Can we allow you to enter into our temple' and explaining that the Sankara Mutt is a plot-hatchery?
Can you refute that it is the rightful duty of each and every citizen of India who has self-respect and rational thought, to stop your treacherous activities since your place is acting as a plot-hatchery against the Dravidians in a free India? Can you accept that when every true Indian realises his duty, you cannot prolong your treachery anymore against all Indians? If you accept this, can you refute that it would be beneficial for you and for the Aryan Purohits i.e., the Brahmins, only when you give heed to our demand to appoint about a five year old boy from the lowest caste as branded by you, a Bala Sankaracharya in the existing vacancy to bring about a change in Sankara Mutt?
If you are not willing to accept our demands, the State Government, Central Government and the United Nations Organisation have to take action against you and your Mutt and provide justice since you are indulged in antisocial activities against the welfare of the world community. Can you deny this?
Can you deny this fact that it is the duty of all mankind who desire humanism, to emphasize that the three types of Governments mentioned above should take action against you, since you are acting as an antisocial element.
When light comes darkness will vanish, when knowledge comes ignorance will be overcome, and when the Grace of God comes the Satanic stronghold will be vanquished. Can you deny this?
Amongst the Brahmin caste there are righteous people who think fairly and strive for justice (amongst them are the Smartha Brahmins of Vivekananda College in Chennai, Prof. Venkataramanan and Prof. Venkataraman, who have proposed and seconded our demands which are mentioned above), they are to be greatly appreciated. Everyday such people are increasing and a great change would take place in the Sankara Mutt and our demands would be accepted and a stage would come when we all would live as the children of one mother, loving brothers and sisters, and as the loving children of God. Can you refute this?

Let the Light of the Supreme loving God shine upon thee

Dr. M. Deivanayagam
Dr. D. Devakala

The Revival Movement of Dravidian Religion

dravida@eth.net