BANANACUE
REPUBLIC
Vol II, No. 08
Feb 23, 2005

 
 
 social criticism by
 Vicente-Ignacio de Veyra III

 



Table of
Contents



ARCHIVE:
2004
2005




Literary website:

Warphoto
 



Standing Up To Thieves

A CERTAIN great concern thinks video and audio piracy is killing the local film and recording industry. I beg to disagree.

First, let me attempt a defense of the pirates by way of the consumer’s position. People buy pirated dvds and vcds and cds for two reasons and two reasons only. One, the bootlegs are way below the price of the legitimate editions. Two, certain consumers are amazed at their newly-discovered access to Cannes and Berlin film festival movies hitherto reserved for jetsetters, a rare added value absent in such Hollywood-worshipping networks as Video City or Astrovision.

Industry representative voices, however, say piracy is ultimately anti-consumer -- because in the long term artists will stop making art or entertainment, and bootlegs will likewise cease to exist. That’s almost like saying all art is for sale and all artists earn from their art. These industry voices should visit Philippine poets and fictionists who lay out around P60,000 to P100,000 of their own money just to get their books printed and distributed by a publisher/distributor like Anvil (almost always with the unwritten because understood guarantee that they won’t get their money back from meager sales). Some of these authors would even get a high from the discovery that their unprofitable books are being resold as bound “xeroxed” pages in the Manila university belt by photocopiers! (A stall there seemingly run by a Moslem [you could judge by the headwear of the woman behind the box] was even selling hardbound “xeroxed” copies of Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses [obviously unaware of the book’s “significance”] at the height of the Islamic outcry over the book!)

But you’re right, artists who don’t have day jobs -- or supposedly know nothing else other than what they do -- need to earn from their art. So piracy must cease. And here’s where my beef against the conventional anti-piracy wisdom begins.

The conventional wisdom totally forgets the consumer. For, to reiterate, the art or entertainment consumer will want to have his hands on any art out there in the market. As long as it’s available, he’ll want to get it. Again, the consumer is merely in awe of the artist and art product in his hands, products previously accessible only to high-paid yuppies. Again, to the art industry representative the consumer is killing the artist. But, to emphasize, the consumer is not thinking about the economic level, he’s thinking about the art and art product solely. When all art for sale dies and there’s only free art, the consumer will not have ceased to exist. Only art for sale will have died.

So what am I saying? Like the war against drugs, the war against piracy should also look at the consumer for ideas. After all, it is the consumer that the art industry seeks to please. Instead, it comes up with lame campaigns like “don’t buy bootlegs because they’re inferior.” An easy-to-find inferior Krzysztof Kieslowski DVD copy (inferior only because its English subtitles are grammatically Indonesian, hehehe) is better than a hard-to-find legitimate one that one can hardly afford once he finds it (and I guarantee you he won't find it). And this inferior talk is even untrue, considering that the legitimate VCDs from Magnavision would sometimes have color fit only for Cinema One.

What the industry should do, apart from place generals in their mission (apparently, the pirates have beaten everyone to them), is lure back the market first (or simultaneous to the raids). Sure, it would be hard to “compete” price-wise considering that legitimate parties pay taxes and (like with the VAT) add this cost to the consumer price. But it could likewise begin talking to its suppliers to offer downgraded editions, that is to say, editions sans the additional features -- leaving only the subtitles and audio options. That’s one. It could also ask the government for import tax breaks, or tax breaks on culture taxes, considering that government officials are already getting much from the pirates who will never cease to exist in the light of day in this country of ours. But that’s a tall order since everyone is talking of creating taxes left and right except from the big guys with huge net values.

When anti-piracy movements begin to consider the consumer, only then will it find support from the general public. As of now, it keeps on talking about and pleading for its own economic cause only, and talking as if its cause is a public cause.

I guess that's all I can say about the lame anti-piracy movement in our country.

 

SO, WHERE were we? Oh. What is killing the movie industry? My theory is almost common wisdom.

First, the movie ticket price has soared at such movie houses as SM Cinemas, and movie house owners like Henry Sy refuse to kowtow to the philosophy that in order for consumption to increase, salaries must likewise increase. Everyone must do his share in this direction, including Henry Sy vis a vis his employees. When the Henry Sy’s of the plutocracy refuse, everyone refuses, and workers continue to receive meager wages and ultimately forego such luxuries as the once-affordable habit of visiting the moviehouses, including Henry Sy’s moviehouses. Even in economics the axiom that the evil you throw out will go back to you likewise holds. But, unfortunately, not everything in economics is economics, with 90% of it inhabited by politics and pure merchant-statesmanship that doesn’t give a shit about revolutions and environmental catastrophes to come since anyway its purveyors have green cards and so on.

This is the reason why cheaper pirated dvds/vcds and ill-branded dvd/vcd players have become much more popular. Moviehouse tickets, like Henry Sy’s department store goods, become dearer each day while pirated goods get cheaper. Simple inflation, ladies and gentlemen, finding an answer in extra-legal zones. And the cause of the inflation? Well, I think we've already discussed that.

Secondly, so much great screenwriting for the movies remain on the shelves of such places as literary contest-sponsoring foundations. Producers with their weird sense of what the public wants become virtual screenwriters, asking writers and directors to do this and that kind of emendation or production to be able to come up with what to them will be charming concepts for the masses they think are more stupid than them. Alas, the masses are proving to be smarter than them. The industry’s stupidity (what Lav Diaz would call “idiocy in the industry”) extends to the theory that bootlegs are killing the industry, as if video addicts would not want to see the big-screen versions of the movies in their collection. Producers had this uptown idea that the taste of the people downtown and from the slums were within their mental grasp and anthropological acumen, not even for a minute considering that perhaps Filipinos only went to watch  stupid Filipino movies because these were the only ones in Tagalog. How many Filipino moviegoers who enjoyed fragments from a certain popular movie but did not necessarily enjoy the whole movie would want to come to the preview microphones during exit time and declare “ang pangit-pangit!” Of course producers were thinking their products were products of genius. As more and more Filipinos begin to understand a little more English, they slowly choose to spend their saved pesos on less stupid Hollywood blockbusters.

Nah. Filipino moviegoers have to be considered for a democratic angle on why the movie industry is dying, in the same way that American democracy had to cease asking why Sundance-inspired indies in the US were thriving (and beginning to make money). For example, the popular wisdom is that the good Filipino directors are working in the telenovelas, this wisdom quite unaware that the directors they’re talking of also work in the movies! The reason? The backward dubbing culture in the Philippine movie industry. Great method acting with great pacing the audio of which doesn’t synchronize would necessarily have tragic results for the great art of acting. Why is Mario O’Hara a great actor? Because, as a radio actor, he’s also a great dubber or voice actor. So many mediocre movie actors turn out great on TV, for the reason that the ill-dubbing harbinger is absent.

 

THE PHILIPPINE movie industry must now rethink its position. Like an advertising agency that has become lazily (and arrogantly) bookish in its formulas and its old focus-group research methods, the studios must also get out of their non-dynamic formula culture and unlazily re-know cinema as a masses-based storytelling or essaying art. Once contented formulas for this truism take a life of their own and begin to forget that the masses change their tastes and ideas and knowledge through time, the truism becomes a lie. The formulas are now targeted at a market that may not be there anymore. People now know, for example, that not all gunshots sound the same, so they laugh when a gunshot aimed at the sky sounds like the bullet hit a rock.

Many Filipino movies have been telling stories or essays the culture either slowly found ludicrous or couldn’t understand anymore. Fragments of a culture don’t necessarily make a product for a culture. When the masses begin to flock to a movie because a producer thinks he’s made the right positioning for the movie with a popular comedian as the vehicle, the masses are usually found going to that movie for a different (“wrong”) reason. Sure the masses may have loved the comedian, despite the formulaic slapstick, but that doesn’t mean they loved the movie. Such an impression, when it piles up in the audience's subconscious, can turn into resignation -- settling for watching the same comedian on TV. In short, such production attitudes for short-term profits in the long run pirate money elsewhere at the expense of the industry supporting an art.

And speaking of positioning, the reason why lousy Hollywood movies become international hits is usually correct marketing. Which is -- again -- a product of good people research as against uptown-deriving formula thoughts about the downtown market. Filipino marketing of even good Filipino movies often ruin the attraction to these movies.

As for the view that scientific marketing ruins art, I say correct marketing supports art. Film production gearing for national success can benefit from a marketing man’s dissent that a certain project’s comedy may be strong only in Manila. Furthermore, marketing as a product of a certain cultural thrust can also create a culture. Diaz believes that it is wrong to say that the masses cannot be changed. True enough, advertising changes people’s views everyday.

Lav Diaz is right. The whole movie industry is wallowing in a rotting self-immersed culture. It must now therefore go back to the people for inspiration. It is, after all, the people who will listen to their stories. As of now, the attitude of the industry is reflected in the behavior of actors devoid of thinking brains who also happen to think they’re royalty and not mere benefactors of a people’s now-waning (because smartly disillusioned) patronage.

 

THE MOVIE industry can take a lesson from the local recording industry. Eraserheads was not a fluke. It was a presence waiting to happen and surprise the conventional industry wisdom at the time the E-Heads came out. That wisdom said Filipinos don’t like electric guitars. Thankfully, the industry marketing gurus thought it had no choice but to support and exploit the band’s shockingly increasing popularity then.

Also, it’s not cd piracy that’s killing the music artist. After all, artists get a little rich only from their concert bookings. It’s only recording execs who get really rich from gold and platinum record sales in our country. And they have the gall to talk about bootleggers as thieves and exploiters.

 

 

# # #

 

Posted 02/23/05. Send comments to: bananacue_republic@yahoo.com

 

Comment, 1:

At Makati Park Square, there are stalls openly selling pirated dvds, cds, and mp3s.  DVDs sell for P90 when they're good copies from China.  Those from Malaysia go for P80 because of their poorer quality.  These pirated cds bear the latest titles, not even shown on theaters yet.  When I asked a vendor if he wasn't scared of the raids going on, he laughed and said not really.  He said: "Edu (who strolls around here often) said as long as we don't sell pirated Filipino film copies and pornographic materials, we're safe.  The police can ignore us."  Edu Manzano, OMB's boss man, has a condominium unit in the upper floors of Makati Park Square, and is sometimes seen going around the mini-mall.  I also saw 3 uniformed policemen looking over (and choosing) the sex videos, which were openly displayed on top of the counter.  And these were sex videos with nude young Asian women on the covers, in various positions. 

As I said before, Filipinos are never ones to follow the law and the rules... lawmakers, implementors and implemented on alike.  As buyers who never really believe in intellectual property rights, we have nothing to worry about.  Piracy is here to stay...   -posted by agnesdv, 03/02/05.

 



"A certain great concern thinks video and audio piracy is killing the local film and recording industry. I beg to disagree."