The International Crisis Group (ICG), 5 September 2006
Papua: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
Asia Briefing N°53
5 September 2006
Overview
No part of Indonesia generates as much distorted reporting as Papua, the western half
of New Guinea that has been home to an independence movement since the 1960s.
Some sources, mostly outside Indonesia, paint a picture of a closed killing field where
the Indonesian army, backed by militia forces, perpetrates genocide against a
defenceless people struggling for freedom. A variant has the army and multinational
companies joining forces to despoil Papua and rob it of its own resources. Proponents
of this view point to restrictions on media access, increasing troop strength in Papua
of the Indonesian armed forces (TNI), payments to the TNI from the giant U.S. copper
and gold mining company, Freeport, and reports by human rights organisations as
supporting evidence for their views.
Others, mostly inside Indonesia, portray Papua as the target of machinations by
Western interests, bent on bringing about an East Timor-style international
intervention that will further divide and weaken the Indonesian nation. Specifically,
according to this view, Western interests are encouraging an international campaign
to review and reject a 1969 United Nations-sponsored plebiscite, called the Act of
Free Choice, that resulted in Papua's integration into the Indonesian republic. Should
that campaign be successful, the international legal grounds for a referendum on
independence would be established. They believe that the independence movement
consists of a small band of criminals who have no real support in the population at
large.
Neither portrayal of Papua is accurate, but both are extraordinarily difficult to dislodge
- particularly because both contain kerneels of truth that fuel false assumptions. Papua
is not a happy place, but neither is it a killing field. Historical injustice and chronic
low-level abuse on the part of security forces are facts. Solidarity groups concerned
about Papua are more active now than five years ago, and some parliamentarians in
Western countries have taken their cause to heart; this has not, however, translated
into growing international support for Papuan independence.
Failure to understand the complexities of the Papuan problem not only produces bad
policies in Jakarta, but can also have severe international consequences, as
witnessed by the plummeting of Indonesian-Australian relations in early 2006 over
Australia's decision to grant temporary asylum to a group of Papuan political activists.
This briefing will examine several questions that lie behind the distortions:
Who governs Papua and how? Are TNI numbers increasing, and if so, why?
What substance is there to the claim of historical injustice in Papua's
integration into Indonesia?
How strong is the independence movement in Papua? Who supports it?
What substance is there to allegations of genocide?
Are there Muslim militias in Papua? And a process of Islamicisation?
How much of Papua is off-limits to outsiders? Why the restrictions?
What can the international community do?
Jakarta/Brussels, 5 September 2006
Click here to view the full report as a PDF file |
