Stuck between Darwin's 'The Origin
of Species' and God's 'Bible' you will find the Blind Fools Evolution
Dictionary.
This invaluable resource ('cause
it probably ain't worth nuthin') is a Blind Fools' definitive
view on the defunct theory of goo-to-you macro-evolution.
And we invite you, the public,
to e-mail us with entries
to help build it up to a volumus giganticus. Be sure to check
back often for additions.
Hopefully one day it will evolve
into an encyclopedia (live the dream).
1. The optical illusion that the earth and universe
are precisely designed to support life.
2. Any conscious being who is able to reflect upon
his surroundings will naturally see all the randomly chaotic
events happening around him as orderly and miraculous when in
fact they are merely chaotic and random.
3. Actually, in order to judge something as chaotic
and random, you must have some type of order in which to judge
it against. So the universe is neither orderly nor chaotic, it
is just the way it is (does this clear things up?).
1. Nothing (or a very very small something) exploded
and produced everything that exists which is the Universe.
2. Everything made itself - for any cause outside
of said Big Bang would have to be outside of Nature (supernatural)
and that won't fly in today's society.
1. Where Darwin Freaks get to shove their own theory/faith
of evolution down our childrens' throats while censoring opposing
scientific view points and forcing us ALL to pay for it.
2. Worked well for Communists and Nazis.
3. China too.
Evolution
1. There was once a time when none of the creatures
in the world had lungs (i.e. fish). This means that there was
no genetic information (the 'blueprint' for living things, carried
on the molecule DNA) for lungs - anywhere. Then, at a later time,
'lung information' arose and was added to the world (i.e. killer
whales and cute dolphins and even lungfishies),
but no 'feather information' as yet - feathers evolved later
(i.e. birds).
2. Not observable since it happens slowly over millions
of years.
3. Nothing scientifically true about it.
4. A really really bad 2001 science fiction movie.
5. The fairy tale of a frog turning into a prince
(just a bit slower, that's all)
1. An atheist trying to fill that God shaped void
in his soul.
Hybrid
1. Involves the nuclear DNA of two individuals coming
together in stable arrangement so that cell division can occur
through doubling of chromosomes and division, with each cell
receiving more or less equal complements of each parent's DNA.
2. Still just a foggy dream in the world of macro-evolution.
3. The attaching of an orangutan's jaw to a human
skull if you can get away with it.
1. In order to explain away the anthropic
principle, this naturalistic secular theory states that an
infinite number of universes exist, all with different laws and
different values for fundamental numbers.
2. Most of them are dark, lifeless places. But by
sheer probability, some will have just the right structure to
support life.
3. Purely the product of scientific imagination -
they are inherently impossible to detect because the would be
"supernatural" in context with our universe which,
to us, is all there is. And we CAN'T have any supernatural talk
going on around here!
2. The belief that life must have come to earth from
outer space.
3. Only pushes the problem of spontaneous life generation
back a little further.
4. The thought of generates some rather humorous
visuals.
Participatory
Anthropic Principle
1. In order to explain away the anthropic
principle, this naturalistic secular theory states that the
universe did not fully exist until human beings emerged to observe
it.
2. In order to become fully real, the universe decided
to evolve human consciousness.
1. Consists of "operational" and "historical"
fields.
2. Operational has inferences and conclusions closely
related to the experiments with little room for speculation.
3. Historical is very limited because experiments
cannot be directly conducted om past events and history which
cannot be repeated.
4. Historical science inferences require a lot of
guesswork.
5. Time machines will solve this problem, though.
6. Historical science's only credibility is from
riding the coat tails of the operational sciences.
7. Conflicts between science and religion occur with
HISTORICAL science, not operational science.
8. Many historical scientists base their science
on their faith - naturalism.
Speciation
1. Variation within a species.
2. Evolutionists favorite argument - supposedly shows
that evolution from one species into another is possible. They
must use this since macro-evolution is not observable since it
happens over long periods of time.
3. I once tried to breed my cat with my dog to see
if it was true, and I have the scars to prove it.