Table of Contents
Letters to the Editor
Letters Policy:
Basically the only thing we have to officially say is this, "Your letter may be directed to another member of the staff, rather than I, the Editor in Chief, answering it". This is done to insure that you get the most highly qualified answer that we can possibly give.
Also, sometimes I am on vacation every week or so.
And I, the Editor in Chief, reserve the right to edit all letters posted. Sometimes the "colorful" language has to be omitted or changed which would be distinguished by italicized (parenthesis) because it it causes nice elderly church ladies thump their Bibles too hard.
And with their fragile and delicate fingers, this causes considerable pain. And since we love and respect them dearly, we choose to save them from such pain so that they can continue to bake us cookies.
Your's truly,
The Editor in Chief.
Blind fool . . . Yes you are . . . keep taking the medication and wishing for a trip back to the dark ages. Sad (bleep)tard I do feel sorry for you.
Klavs Z
Klavs Z,
Would you like to be on our mailing list?
Klavs Z's Response . . .
No thank you very much. Regards from an intelligent human to a lesser being.
You had a little slogan to describe Darwinists it was a take-off on Hebrews 11:1 and I want to get it right cant find it now. What was it, exactly?
Gary V.
Faith is the substance of fossils hoped for, the evidence of links unseen.
Hi,
I must be obtuse or something, but are you guys atheists or fundamentalists (your sight is ambiguous, providing compelling evidence for both sides of evolution) please straighten me out.
Sincerely,
John Z
Please show me the "compelling evidence" for the pro-evolution side of the debate on our site which you found. If Miko slipped another one of his practical-joke articles in, I'll kill him! Then I'll make him give up the nice soft chair with wheels that we rotate from member to member on a monthly basis.
Sincerely,
Editor In Chief
John Z's Response . . .
The pictures you have of transitional forms illustrate the point that living things show their history. That's why if evolution is true we WILL NOT find the creatures you illustrate, but rather fish with legs, reptiles with feathers, whales with legs. If ANY of the creatures you proposed WERE found in fossil record, it would go a LONG WAY towards removing evolution from schools, science, etc.
I use your graphics (with proper citation) in my biology lectures as evidence for evolution. Thanks for help making the point.
yours In Christ,
-JZ
Dear John,
I can do one better...
Let's say someone finds a fossil which stirs some interest because it "appears" to be intermediate. I would ask the evolutionist, "How do you know that it's a transitional evolutionary form rather than a variation in design by God the Creator?"
The evolutionist will have to say it is true because evolution is true.
If this be the case, then how can the fossil record in any way be evidence for evolution if it relies on evolution being true in the first place?
Turns into circular reasoning, me thinks. Kinda like rocks dating fossils and fossils dating rocks.
Now my head hurts and need an aspirin. Must have pulled a muscle.
Sincerely,
Editor in Chief
Editor's Note: I'm still awaiting John's response. And we hope he (and others) don't really think that we believe any transitionals would actually look like the ones we post - they are just for fun and to draw attention to our pathetic attention-deprived selves.
But then again,
if you believe in spontanious generation,
well maybe . . .