In article <368f4448.91148701@news.ot.centuryinter.net>,
Hooked on quack?Call Duxanonymous. wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 1998 08:35:56 GMT, jthunderbird@my-dejanews.com wrote
> and anarchy snipped.........:
>
> >In article <75lgns$o8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> > jthunderbird@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> >> What is to be done? Millenial Amnesty! >
> SNIP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >a light matter. When we as hippies excused ourselves from
> >your society some thirty years back, we said we had more
> >important things to think about. We weren't kidding. Here
> >we are, we thought about it, and we aren't kidding now.
> >
> >Welcome to the real world.
> >
> >Somberly,
> >Johnny Thunderbird
>
> Yeah. You excused yourself.....except for the internet. Lucky thing
> the rest of us hung around huh? Like DARPA?

You're not expressing yourself very well. Nobody ever heard of any
DARPA hippies. Who are you trying to excuse, and for what behavior?

> Lay of the window pane and you should be able to think straight in
> about a dozen or so years.

Straight thinking is a symptom of impaired cognition. You might
use a boost in consciousness, like that window pane you so fear.
It could improve your communication skills.

> anarchy - the choice of a new generation

See this thread in alt.anarchism. That's another field, like the
computer biz, I've been in for many years. You may drop out in a
different way than someone else's choice. For example, you didn't
see fit to discuss the two geochemistry issues I raised. If they're
over your head, you must be under water. What part can't you handle, the words or the logic?

We cannot expect the carbon burden of the air and the global
temperatures to rise in smooth predictable curves. They won't.
Mechanisms might be triggered by small temperature increases,
two of which I described to you. Either could be lethal to the
entire biosphere, but they are very likely to interact because
they're in the same oceans. Excess carbon in the air is a genie
we should work at, very hard, to put back in its bottle, very quickly.
There are entirely too many deadly traps along this trail. Chain
reactions, which will release entirely too much energy putting
carbon and heat into the air, are everywhere around us. Fire is
one example. Each degree of temperature rise dries vegetation a
bit more, making our forests more vulnerable to fire. Forests are
what we need more of, not less. Carbon in the biosphere is good,
in the air it's bad. The difference is a matter of life and death.

The forecasts of slow, gradual climate warming are based on
a mathematical treatment which is inadequate, making them
unrealistically optimistic. The pipelines need to stop flowing,
and the coal trains to be stilled, as a matter of the public safety. This operation is an amputation, best performed on a
frozen economy, to reduce injury. So debts of private parties
are forgiven, ensuring minimal traffic in transactions during
the transition period. Are there any questions? Got a better
idea?

Your implication that you think better than I, isn't showing.
Dose that window pane and come again.

Pedagogically,
Johnny Thunderbird
Conceiving Anarchy
http://members.xoom.com/jthunderbird/black1.html

" We thought about what he said,
'Endeavor to persevere'.
We thought about it a long time.
Then when we thought about it long enough,
we declared war on the Union.
" Chief Dan George, as Lone Watie
in The Outlaw Josie Wales

Re: Millenial Amnesty and Babylon alt.activism.death-penalty 981228