Philadelphia, PA wrote: The 1-800-GO-WEBTV number has been helpful to
me. But, I have quit using e-mail to get help.
Most of the time, my e-mail was not answered.
On the few occasions I got a response, my
question wasn't answered. My own opinion would be to either redo the e-mal help service or do away with it.
Largo, FL -- Gulf coast of Florida wrote: Reference having to spend to upgrade
performance: This should be included in the
original cost of the unit. Upgrades to the
system should not cost WebTV customers. If so,
WebTV would be just as at fault as phone
companies wanting internet subscribers to have
to pay per minute charges..AFTER ALREADY TAXING
ISP's for the same!!!
Rockland County, New York wrote:
Let me start off by saying that I did not have
enough money to buy a computer system. When I
saw that WebTV was access to the internet using
your TV, I was shocked and in total amazement.
I could not wait to get my hands on this
device. I had my wife go in the middle of a
TROPICAL STORM to go to the "WIZ" and buy this.
It took me 5 minutes to hook up and no memory
problems and no configuration problems like a
computer. This alone was well worth the money
I paid for it. People today are looking for
the ability to turn it on and it works with no
hassle....WebTV does that and more!!!
Since I have had the WebTV unit, I have
logged onto the system for more then 3000
minutes per month. I have made numerous calls
to WebTV with ideas to make it a better system.
I have also read many reviews in many
newspapers and magazines about WebTV and
brought it to the attention to the WebTV
people. I have been a HUGE advocate and
continue to recommend WebTV to all the people I
come in contact with.
With all this effort, WebTV has made me a
Beta-Tester. I get all the new features before
anyone else and my job is to make sure that
what will be released to the public is working
fine and what we can do to make it better
before it goes to the public. I cannot tell
you how honored I am to be a Beta-Tester.
If anyone out there would like to write to me
and hear about what I am Beta-Testing at this
point...please do so....My address is:
ScottNY914@webtv.net
I will be more then happy to talk to anyone
within the WebTV system and what we can all do
to make this better.
Now for the Customer Service Department...I
to have written to "WeCare" and have waited
several days to get a reply and I also find
those replies to be to brief. With all the time
you wait for a reply, you always feel like they
rushed the reply and you were brushed off. As
for the wait time on the phone....That is
something that needs to improve and I know that
as WebTV grows, so will the Customer Service
Department.
I have taken enough of all your time and I
hope we can= all soon be in a WebTV "CHAT"
room so we can all talk and get to know one
another....I KNOW THAT THIS IS COMING SOON
(INSIDE TIP FROM A BETA-TESTER)
Once again, please feel free to write me and
ask any questions you have...If I cannot answer
it, I will not be afraid to tell you to call
WebTV, but at least it might save you a call
and a long wait for a reply........ ScottNY914@webtv.net
Gerard, Ohio wrote:
It's a great page you got. I use the tip I
submitted quite a bit. (See the tips page) When the one number gets
bogged down and things get slow, the other always seems to be faster.
Lexington, South Carolina wrote: Love it !
Michigan wrote:
Your theme music should be 'Yellow Submarine'
WWWebTV: Thanks Michigan, its a done deal !
Anchorage, Alaska wrote: So far so good ,Local access no. sucks !
Los Angeles, Ca wrote: Webtv users like myself cannot , apparently, use the web to actually
talk, by human voice, to people all around the world, virtually for free
for unlimited amounts of time, as can normal pc users.
All the pc owner needs is a simple attachment like "webtalk" etc. We,
webtv users miss out on all of this. Am I wrong ?
San Diego, CA wrote: There needs to be an end key for keyboard
(takes cursor to end of sentance. Also, space
bar is too small. The entire keyboard needs
redesign and current customers should be given
significant discount to upgrade to it.
Western New York wrote: Concerning survey questions, It would depend on
the services offered.
los angeles, Ca wrote: Waiting time to log is increasing. I am
beginning to feel like this is AOL.
Toledo, Ohio wrote: WECARE is getting a bit faster at responding
and the reps are becoming more knowledgable,
BUT they still don't tell you anything.
Mt.Gilead N.C. wrote: I wish there wasn't a toll charge to connect to
webtv. 21 cents a minute is alot for me.
San Francisco, CA wrote: Slow response to e-mailed questions -- response
seems canned and not really answering the
question.
Ma wrote:
I know I sound like a broken record but, Webtv
is a $329 box. People who own a computer
understand its limitations..It will ALWAYS be
behind the current technology. Thats fine. that
doesn't make it a great product,at a great
price. Your not missing much. Someone said
somthing about ISP's browsers and their being
able to provide more features. ISP's dont
provide anything but a connection to the
internet. At 20 dollars a month Webtv
recompresses all it's images...something NO ISP
except Webtv does. That a REALLY big deal. As
for the competition...Webtv has too much of a
head start, and it's price is the lowest. The
closest competitor is around $500, too close to
a real computer for people to want it. Stop
complaining and enjoy what you got..an
incredible product at a cheap price. )
Suwanee, Georgia wrote:
Sent several e mails to webtv, never recieved
an answer. Phone service has been acceptable
sent several e mails to webtv, recieved no
answer Phone service seems adequate.
New York wrote:
I know many Webtv owners are impatient for
upgrades. One thing that makes webtv so good is
no need for us to buy software to run our
machines.Software that rarely works the way it
was intended. Many of you who have used
computers know what I mean. I will gladly wait
for Webtv to debug all the software before I
get it.I want no part in making software run on
a system it was not designed. Many good things
are coming , just hold on a bit longer (measure
twice,cut once)
Kansas wrote:
I do not expect to pay more for improvements to
WebTV. The services's current price is in line
with ISP's which deliver on much more current
and capable browsers. WebTV needs to make good
on their promotional promises of rapid upgrades.
Their television internet appliance
competition is on the horizon and I have been
reading exciting news of what others will have
to offer. Until I see our next WebTV upgrade I
would be hesitant to encourage my friends to
jump on board at ths time.
Biilgatus of Borg wrote:
Top 10 Ways Microsoft Would Change The Auto Business:
10. New seats would require everyone to have the same butt size.
9. We would all have to switch to Microsoft Gas.
8. The U.S. government would be forced to rebuild all of the roads for Microsoft cars; they will drive on the old roads, but they run very slowly.
7. The oil, alternator, gas and engine warning lights would be replaced by a single 'General Car Fault' warning light.
6. Sun MotorSystems would make a car that was solar-powered, twice as reliable and five times as fast, but would run on only 5% of the roads.
5. You would be constantly pressured to upgrade your car.
4. You could have only one person in the car at a time, unless you bought a Car95 or CarNT -- but then you would have to buy ten more seats and a new engine.
3. Occasionally, your car would die for NO apparent reason and you
would have to restart it. Strangely, you would just accept this as
normal.
2. Every time the lines of the road were repainted, you would have to buy a new car.
1. People would get excited about the new features of the latest Microsoft cars, forgetting that these same features had been available from other car makers for years !
New Jersey wrote: The salesmen at the Wiz assured us that WEBTV
would keep up with the latest technological
developments at this price...I quote, "whatever
computers can do on the internet, WEBTV will do
just as well or better."
Minneapolis, MN wrote: WeCare raraely even responds to my questions
anymore. When they do, the people know
virtually nothing about the Internet in my
opinion. I had to explain to them what a
corporate intranet was as I was trying to
access mine over the net. I am very
disappointed in their service as I am
disappointed with the total absolesence of te
WebTV browser. We still don't have access to
technologies that have been around for well
over a year ("real" frames, Java, Javascript,
Shockwave, .ra file support, png file support.,
etc...)
New York, wrote: I think wecare has improved slightly, but not
yet adequately to all the above questions
Long Island, New York wrote: I enjoy the webtv need more upgrades
Chicago, Illinios wrote: Very nice page.
Tulsa, Oklahoma wrote: About paying more for better webtv performance:
It would have to be a helluva performance
upgrade for me to shell out much money for it.
My WebTV service charge should get me all the
upgrades I need
Santa Barbara, California, wrote: Tough to answer without knowing he nature of
the amenities involved
Montgomery, Alabama wrote: I'm so glad that there is someplace that folks
with webtv can go to get info... :) :) :)
New York wrote: KEEP E-MAILING WEB TV TO GET A JAVA BROWSER.
Indianapolis, In wrote: WeCare@WebTV? Pardon my snickering. They take a
week -- or more -- to acknowledge that you've
even asked a question/had a problem. When they
do get to you, you realize that you could get
the same answers from the manual. I realize
that they are only human and are dealing with
all of our complaints, but OVER A WEEK for a
response?!
When everything is functioning as it should
-- and you're not trying to access something
that WebTV doesn't support yet -- it's almost
the greatest thing since sliced bread. If you
have a question/problem, you'd be better off
addressing it to the loaf of bread.
I'm not trying to trash anybody. It's just
that "Customer Service" should mean what it
says. Having worked in customer-oriented
positions for nearly a decade, I know whereof I
speak.
My advice: Polish and streamline the 800
number and WeCare@WebTV, give us timetables --
and stick to them -- for upgrades, and just
keep the rest of running smoothly.
The question about spending more to improve
WebTV's performance didn't really surprise me.
This is, after all, a business. I have a
question of my own: "Is our current WebTV just
a 'cookie' so that we'll pay more and more for
marginal improvements?". I sincerely hope the
answer comes back as a resounding and
unequivocal "NO. It will get a lot better at a
minimal -- or less -- cost to our customers." Thank you for your time.
Illinios wrote: Just got on - I would like to start designing a
homepage I have a spot reserved but am not sure
exactly how to get started. Any assistance would be appreciated.
WWWebTV:..Illinios please Email me for assistance.