Many young-earth creationists say that day-age interpretation model of Genesis is based more upon scientific evidence than biblical interpretation. However, every concept promoted by the day-age interpretation is based upon the Bible. Many of the concepts can be found in the creation accounts found in books other than Genesis. The Bible reminds us that all scripture must be interpreted on the basis of the entire Bible, and not just one isolated passage. Let's examine some of the challenges to the day-age interpretation and see if they are valid or not.
It is important to distinguish between what the Bible says and what we think it says. At one time Christians claimed that the Bible declared that the Earth was at the center of our Solar System and universe (the position of the Roman Catholic Church through the 16th century). The Roman Catholic Church cited scripture to "prove" that the Earth was the center of the Solar System and universe. We (Christians) look back at these scriptural "proofs" as merely interpretations of scripture that were not valid. In fact, the Bible says that the earth is controlled by the heavens and not the other way around (Job 38:33). Likewise, we must be cautious not to make our interpretations of scripture the equivalent of scripture. They aren't. I am not going to claim that my interpretation is the only possible valid interpretation or that I am above being wrong in my interpretation. However, I do believe that my interpretation of Genesis is the most reasonable, both in terms of scripture (based upon all the creation verses in the Old and New Testament) and the record of nature.
Complaint | Answer |
What is this "frame of reference" in the Day-Age interpretation of Genesis? This is scripture, not science! | Are the rules for interpreting scripture different from the rules for interpreting science? Let's interpret a "non-scientific" passage without using a frame of reference... |
Progressive Creation (Day-Age Interpretation) is non-biblical | No matter how you interpret the Genesis creation account, God created progressively. |
The Hebrew word for day (yom) always refers to a 24 hour day. | A clear reading of Genesis (and the rest of the Bible) indicates that yom can refer to a period of time much longer than 24 hours. |
A God of love would not create a world of millions of years of death, suffering, bloodshed, disease, mutations, extinction, etc. | The Bible says God created everything, which includes death, disease, etc. Death of animals is not evil, unless you take a New Age position. |
The Bible doesn't say why the Earth was dark in Genesis 1:2. The idea that the Earth was covered in clouds is purely speculation from science. | God tells Job that when He created the Earth "I made a cloud its garment, and thick darkness its swaddling band" (Job 38:4-9) |
The completeness of the biblical genealogies requires that Adam was created on or about 4004 B.C. | There are provable gaps in the biblical genealogies, along with differences in the number of generations between the different genealogies listed in the Bible. In addition, the Hebrew word, ab (father) can have the meaning "grandfather," "great-grandfather," etc., and ben can have the meaning "grandson, "great-grandson," etc. The Bible also makes reference to 1000 generations - a period of at least 40,000 years of human life. |
The day-age interpretation of Genesis is based upon the frame of reference mentioned at the beginning of the account (Genesis 1:2). Although it seems trivial, every inductive study of the Bible begins with establishing a frame of reference. One must first determine who the author is, who he is communicating with, and what is being said. However, many young-earth interpretations of Genesis (also those presented by atheists) begin with the assumption that the frame of reference of Genesis 1 is in the heavens or somewhere above the earth. Obviously, this is not what the text says. It is the personal God of Christianity who came to Earth to specially prepare the planet and create life on it. Yes, God could have created life on earth without actually visiting the earth. However, the God of Christianity is a personal God who is personally involved with His creation and the creatures He loves.
Now, let us look at a passage of the Bible and attempt to analyze it without establishing the frame of reference. We could take any passage, but let's look at Genesis 19:8. The passage says that it is okay for men to do "anything" to virgin daughters but not okay to commit those acts with other men. Is this what the Bible teaches? We need to establish the frame of reference. Who is making this statement and does this represent God's views? What is the context? What does the rest of the Bible say about the topic in question. You can see that if we fail to establish the frame of reference, we can (and probably will - as the cults do) interpret the Bible anyway we wish.
The day-age interpretation has been described as being "progressive creation" as if that term is contrary to the Bible. In fact, no matter how you interpret the Genesis creation account, God created progressively. Whether God created and populated the Earth using 24 hour days or long periods of time, He did not create everything instantaneously. Young-earth proponents suggest that for God to take millions of years to create and prepare the Earth somehow limits His power. What they fail to appreciate is that God's timeframe is not the same as ours. Both the Bible and modern science say that God must be eternal and operate in at least two dimensions of time. The Bible clearly states that with God a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years as a day (Psalms 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8). God's power is in no way limited because He took billions of years to create the universe. Since He can move forward and backward in time, He probably wasn't sitting back and twiddling His thumbs during that time. I suspect He has spent billions of years (relative to our time) listening to the prayers and petitions of billions of people who have inhabited the Earth throughout history.
Scriptural Reference | Period of Time | Verses |
Genesis 2:4 | 6 "days" | This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made earth and heaven. (Genesis 2:4) |
Genesis 2:16-17, 5:5 | 900+ years | And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, "From any tree of the
garden you may eat freely; but from the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you
shall surely die." (Genesis 2:16-17) So all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years, and he died. (Genesis 5:5) |
Daniel 8:26 | 3000+ years | "And the vision of the evenings and mornings which has been told is true; but keep the vision secret, for it pertains to many days in the future." (Daniel 8:26) |
Genesis 2:2, Hebrews 4:4-11 | 6000+ years | The seventh day of Genesis is not closed. In all other days, "there
is the morning and the evening, the n day." And by the seventh day God completed His work which He had done; and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done. (Genesis 2:2) In the book of Hebrews, the author tells us to labor to enter into God's seventh day of rest, which continues to this day. By any calculation, God's seventh day of rest has been at least 6,000 years long: For He has thus said somewhere concerning the seventh day, "And God rested on the seventh day from all His works"... Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall through following the same example of disobedience. (Hebrews 4:4-11) |
For more information, see the page, Biblical Evidence for Long Creation Days
The Young-Earth interpretation states that the process of survival of the fittest and that death, violence, pain, fear, suffering, are evil. If God did not create these, who did? My Bible says God created everything (Genesis. 1:31, Nehemiah. 9:6, Isaiah 44:24, John 1:3, Mark 13:19, Colossians 1:16, Ephesians 3:9, Revelation 4:11). In fact, the Bible says specifically that God created carnivores on day 6. There are those who think that Satan turned God's perfect creation into the current "mess" it is in. I have a real problem with this theology, since 1) it attributes creative ability to Satan (who is a deceiver) and 2) says that God is not powerful enough to have stopped it.
Actually, although scripture says that God's creation was "very good", it does not say there was no "violence, pain, fear, suffering, or death." In fact, scripture says that there was death, mourning, crying, and pain before the fall. This can be seen in part from the curse given to the woman as a result of Eve's sin:
To the woman He said, "I will greatly multiply Your pain in childbirth, In pain you shall bring forth children; Yet your desire shall be for your husband, And he shall rule over you." (Genesis 3:16)
You will notice that God multiplies the pain, but that childbirth was already to have been associated with pain. The presence of pain before the fall is confirmed in the book of Revelation:
"and He shall wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there shall no longer be any death; there shall no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away." (Revelation 21:4)
This verse tells us that death, mourning, crying and pain are some of the "first things." the Greek words translated "first things" is "prwtos prwtos" which would literally be translated "first first" being actually repeated for emphasis.
Pain, in itself is not evil, but necessary for humans and animals. If we never felt pain, we would occasionally inflict great damage on ourselves. Most people, when they touch a hot object move their hand away from the object rather quickly. If we had no pain receptors, we probably wouldn't move our hand until we smelled the smoke of charred flesh. This is obviously not good. Therefore pain is a good thing in this life. In the new creation there will be no pain, since entropy, the leading, if not only, cause of pain will be eliminated.
Young-earth creationists say that the Day-Age interpretation assumes the Earth was dark because of clouds and gases only from what scientists have said, because Genesis doesn't say why the surface of the oceans was dark. However, one of the first rules of interpretation of scripture is that no scripture is interpreted independently of the rest of scripture. God's own words to Job tell us why the Earth was dark:
"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding... Or who enclosed the sea with doors, When, bursting forth, it went out from the womb; when I made a cloud its garment, and thick darkness its swaddling band, (Job 38:4-9)
The Bible not only tells us that the Earth was dark during its infancy, but it tells us why the Earth was dark - it was covered with thick clouds - something that science confirms.
James Ussher and John Lightfoot took the genealogies of Genesis and used them to calculate the date of Adam's creation. In fact, Lightfoot went so far as to announce not only the year, but the month day and time of day! In doing this, both men made two assumptions. First, they assumed that the genealogies were complete and exhaustive. Second, they assumed that the English translations (citing "father of" and "son of") are accurate. Both assumptions are provably false. There are provable gaps in the biblical genealogies, along with differences in the number of generations between the different genealogies listed in the Bible. For example, look at the genealogies of Matthew compared to that found in 1 Chronicles:
Matthew 1:8 | 1 Chronicles 3:10-12 |
and to Asa was born Jehoshaphat; and to Jehoshaphat, Joram; and to Joram, Uzziah; |
Asa his son, Jehoshaphat his son, Jehoram his son, Ahaziah his son, Joash his son, Amaziah his son, Azariah [Uzziah] his son |
As can be seen, Matthew's genealogy leaves out at least three generations, Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah. In contrast, Luke adds a generation (Cainan) to the genealogy of Shem:
Genesis 5-11 | Luke 3:34-36 (reversed order) |
And Lamech lived one hundred and eighty-two years, and became the father of a son. Now he called his name Noah, (Genesis 5:28-29)... And Noah was five hundred years old, and Noah became the father of Shem, Ham, and Japheth. (Genesis 5:32)... The sons of Shem: Elam, Asshur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram. (Genesis 10:22)... Arphaxad was the father of Shelah, and Shelah the father of Eber. Two sons were born to Eber: One was named Peleg (Genesis 10:24-25) |
the son of Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of Heber, the son of Shelah, (Luke 3:35) the son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem, the son of Noah, the son of Lamech, (Luke 3:36) |
Therefore, it seems likely that the Genesis genealogies represent the highlights of biblical genealogies, and not necessarily an exhaustive list.
In addition, the Hebrew word, ab (father) can have the meaning "grandfather," "great-grandfather," etc., and ben can have the meaning "grandson, "great-grandson," etc (Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament). In fact, Hebrew has no word for grandfather or grandson. Therefore, verses that are commonly translated as father and son could be translated:
NASB | Alternate Translation |
And Enosh lived ninety years, and became the father of Kenan. (Genesis 5:9) | And Enosh lived ninety years, and became the father of the family line that culminated with Kenan. (Genesis 5:9) |
The provable existence of gaps in the biblical genealogies and the use of ab to designate a line of descendents makes it entirely likely that Adam could have been created 10's of thousands of years ago. The Bible itself states that the covenant and laws of God have been proclaimed to a "thousand generations" (Deuteronomy 7:9, 1 Chronicles 16:15, Psalms 105:8). The Bible does not give 1000 genealogies, so one must assume that those given are only highlights of the actual genealogies. Since the Bible declares that there have been 1,000 generations, even if a generation is considered to be 20 years, this adds up to at least 20,000 years. A biblical generation is often described as being 40 years, which would represent at least 40,000 years. However, since the first dozen or more generations were nearly 1,000 years, this would make humans nearly 50,000 years old, which agrees very well with dates from paleontology and molecular biology (see Descent of Man Theory: Disproved by Molecular Biology).
For related pages, see Day-Age Genesis One Interpretation, Biblical Evidence for Long Creation Days, Did God Create Carnivores on Day 6?, and Is the Young-Earth Interpretation Biblical?
Last updated 10/23/01