Workshop 5 Daily Reports
Struggle For the Land and Environment Summary of
Sub-Table Presentations
July 28-29, 1997
El Indiano, Andalucia, Spain
"The Word"
Newsletter of the Second Intergalactic Encuentro for
Humanity and Against Neoliberalism
Workshop: Struggle For the Land and Environment Summary of
Sub-Table Presentations 1-5 July 28-29
1. Land and Rural Life. The agrarian question and
the elimination of the small farmer.
2a-b Land occupancy and the struggle for the land. Human
relations with the land and indigenous concepts of the earth.
3. The destruction of the earth. Polluting energies and
industries. Ingestion of toxic residues. Climate change and
desertification. Water as a resource for the few.
4-5. New technologies. Nature as a commodity of the world
elite. Ecology as a business. Speci-ism, animal liberation, genetic
manipulation, and patenting of life forms.
Table 1 July 28
Agriculture and Rural Existence
The workshop began quite late, like all the other ones, making it
impossible to present ourselves personally and to present the
collective to which we belong. The majority of our workshop is
composed of people that represent different collectives and the rest
of the people come on their own account.
After this introduction we talked from the morning until the
afternoon about the way to organize our workshop, because it was
decided before that first day we should not enter into the ponencias
(prepared papers) in order to agree first about the proposed working
method. Two persons volunteered themselves to be part of the
workshop every day in order to guide discussion and write it down.
After this we finished this part of the day trying to resolve the
language problem and to decide who in the workshop could take care of
simultaneous translations.
The Afternoon
In the place where we wanted to have a debate about the building
up of a network for different struggles, it turned out that most of
the people ignored the existence of networks that already have been
established, and all the work that has been done this year.
Therefore, the participants in the workshop asked the people in the
group to have an exposition of all the information we have up to now
about the network. After this, we started with an open debate about
the principles or supports that the network needs in order to make it
better known and to develop it more.
The few people in the workshop that took part in the first
encuentro also brought forward how the network(s) for struggle and
resistance should be considered, which polarized the debate around
the theme of a supposed network of information and action with our
own framework and means, in order to break through the wall of
information that the big communication centers build around the small
and big struggles, at once ignoring them and distorting reality.
The consensus that goes along with the political practice that was
originated in Chiapas (although Sandanistas already had this long
before) was one of the themes treated from the viewpoint of new ways
to create politics that are horizontal and go along with bases. But
at this point, the problem also came up that at this moment we cannot
make decisions about campaigns and actions on a worldwide level.
The theme that was most discussed, with different contributions
and various points of departure, was to interrogate and to ask
ourselves who we are, which brought us to the necessity to recuperate
our identity as a person and as a collective, as a way that could
make possible an individual and collective questioning of the society
in which we live. For this we looked at the example of the struggle
for resistance of the indigenous people of America, who in spite of
ethnocide and genocide, and in spite of rejection and humiliations,
always kept afire the flames of their identity, reinforcing them with
strong doses of imagination, affection, courage, and dignity. . .
It is because of this, or because of the mythology and the
affection of their guardian gods that 500 years after we robbed them
of their identity and dignity, we wake up to give ourselves mirrors
without glitter in which we can meet ourselves, finding out and
uncovering to others that we are all alike.
Table 1 July 29
Sindicato Obreros de Campo (SOC: Agrarian Laborers Union)
Andalucia is an autonomous community. It concentrates great
latifundi (very large properties in only a few hands). The peasants'
struggle has had as a goal the redistribution of land. In the
eighties there were important mobilizations that were harshly
repressed in 1983, Andalucia introduced the Agrarian Reform Act, but
this was paralyzed by landowners filing recourses in the courts.
Consequently, this Act did not acknowledge the laborers' land
rights: it did not put at stake the ownership of the land. The
Agrarian Laborers Union (SOC) proposed the occupation of abandoned
properties, firstly in a symbolic way and then settling on them,
working them and creating cooperatives ("Tierra y Libertad," "El
Basque," "El Indiano"). The problems, however, are numerous and are
increasing with the Brussels decision to aid the abandonment of
production.
Biological Agriculture as a Means of Integration of Different
Marginal Collectives
The SOC promotes courses about ecological agriculture. From
there, a group of six people was created, mainly marginalized people
who started a project on a property situated in "El Tejar," Cordoba,
which was lent for one year. They started with a lot of difficulties
(lack of experience, of funds, of villagers' trust...). The moral
support came from other collectives interested in them. The strong
rains this year ruined the crops, the effort and the dreams of these
people.
From Ecological Agriculture to Sustained Rural Tourism
Currently a big change is taking place in rural areas due to the
dismantling of traditional means of production. In many areas people
lived from the crops, and now they are living from "services". This
is an assault on the traditional culture of Andalucian villages who
are obliged to change their lifestyle. Agrarian society should
reflect on this, see it the other way round and consider rural
tourism as a viable alternative which would combine several services,
and respect for the lifestyle of people with landroots. Any integral
vision would lead us to biological cultures: the central focus of the
rural project. It would be a more human and less mercantilist way
for cities and country people to relate to each other.
As a result we could create trading networks which promote mutual
awareness. Nevertheless we still have to approach the alternative
bank issue to finance self-managed projects.
Networks
The session is opened with a question: which networks are already
existing, how do they work and which problems do they face to be
efficient? We start explaining Net 3, "A Fair Trade and Solidarity
Network", composed of base nets, information on ecology, solidarity
shops. Ecological and agriculture and stock farm (micronet),
craftsmen and jugglers (self-managed). Network 3 trades products
that are not essential in their source country, which are not
damaging to the environment nor derived from exploitation.
This creates the necessity of looking for alternative financial
ways: the Alternative Bank. Other experiences of this already exist
in various countries: Germany, Japan, England. A database arises on
how could this bank work without reproducing capitalist banking
patterns.
Considering the people who are creating the Network, the
discussion focuses on whether to start from nothing or use already
existing instruments; the debate comes to the conclusion that we can
work in every front by claiming our rights, by creating new forms of
self-management and pressure on governments and multinational
companies, which are imposing neoliberal policies.
There were many proposals, such as a world-wide boycott on certain
products from multinational companies and requiring them to pay
global salaries equal to those of their source country.
Table 2a-b July 28
Land Occupancy and the Struggle for the Land.
Relations with the Land and Indigenous Concepts of the Earth
This table has attracted a lot of interest in this, the first day
of the Intergalactic Encuentro. Around 80 people have participated
in the two groups we have made for the discussion.
In our subtable 2a we will discuss the following presentations,
both written and oral, that our comrades have brought from the
various countries. The presentations (Ponencias) are on the
following subjects: Struggle for the land in Mexico, the Philippines,
Ecuador, Peru, El Salvador, land collectives in Spain, Arragon and
farmers in India.
The first day we got to know each other and organized the work for
the rest of the week.
Struggle for the Earth and Environment
In the morning we heard the presentation of Comrade Jose, from La
Ceiba de la Selva Margarita, Chiapas, Mexico. We spoke a bit about
the Indigenous uprising and about some concrete proposals:
1. Distribution of Land
2. Organic Farming
3. Reforestation
4. Collective Work
We discussed as well the organization itself and the collective
decision-making of the indigenous communities, about the assembly of
resistance and about the influence of land reform issues in the
recent Mexican elections.
From this we tied together the problems of land reform in
Andalucia. Our comrades of the farm workers union (SOC) from the
co-op "La Verde" made the point that the occupation of land is only
one part of the struggle, along with appropriate commercial relations
and maintaining and organizing collectives.
In the afternoon we spoke about the network of struggles and came
up with some proposals and ideas.
- At the 1st Encuentro in Mexico it was decided that we need to
coordinate the transmission of information to carry out campaigns and
solidarity in the face of any injustice or repression.
- It is necessary that different collectives be open-minded to
participate in the network because it is impossible to agree on
everything. This way we don't need to lose our autonomy and
diversity. And we can coordinate common causes next. The network is
very important to denounce injustices and violations of human rights
in other countries. (One person from Mexico told of how they had been
kidnapped recently and solidarity actions from other women in her
communities helped her release).
- It is necessary to keep in mind the different cultures and levels
of education among the people that will be involved in the network.
- It is also necessary to coordinate our collectives into much
larger networks, for example, the struggle against Maastricht, and
the struggle against neoliberalism.
We also heard some real experiences of networking: The fight for
land reform in the Philippines, a country with similar colonial
history to Mexico. The experience of the autonomous network in
Zaragosa and the march against unemployment and the lack of social
security. Also, there is a network against the Maastricht and
neoliberalism in Europe and another in solidarity with Tangiers.
Table 2b July 28
Introduction to the Theme of Networks
We held an introductory session organized by themes.
We first heard a partial reading of the Second Declaration of La
Realidad, in which the proposal was made to create a network of all
of our individual struggles.
Moving to different concrete examples of struggle, we observed
that:
- Concerning our environmental movement, we should first examine
similar situations (such as the repatriation of foreigners).
- We should review experiences from other places, perhaps using
electronic mail. This presents the following problems:
a) how to use the information and,
b) will it only be for computer science experts? Who has the means
to get on the internet and who does not?
In some situations, we see the lack of a realistic outlook amongst
those doing solidarity work who are not at the point of a gun. When
a massacre occurs (such as in the case of the Japanese embassy in
Lima) how does the network respond? In many places, they seem to
prioritize the philosophical over the practical defensive actions.
The problem of public opinion: how to get activist information
into the minds of the people? The problems of neo-liberalism are
world-wide. There is only a difference of degree. Networks of
resistance are not new. In Latin America, for example, many have
been wiped out by low-intensity conflict. Drawing on what was
learned in resistance to this, a method was constructed for
coordinating actions and strategy.
To clarify our objectives:
-- To build a network without hierarchy, a horizontal organization
-- For each organization to agree on its own specific goals
-- To circulate information
-- To quickly arrange meetings over the internet
-- To construct nodes, keeping in mind the importance of grassroots
work in each community
To keep in mind when thinking about the networks:
-- What are our objectives?
-- Who will participate?
-- How will technical resources be obtained?
When there is no phone service, it is almost impossible to do this
type of work. We need to democratize information distribution in the
following ways: -- To create nodes which are self organized at the
local level -- To disseminate information, give mutual support,
exchange experiences and possibly also to serve as alternative
methods of communication if e-mail is to be boycotted or if it
collapses
The debate revolves around these three points: -- Information
networks: problems of getting resources, especially electronic --
Human networks: the need for forming flesh and blood connections --
Differences between places that share problems of equal intensity on
one hand, and areas that do support and solidarity work on the other
hand
The need to expand the world network was discussed, such that it
includes more than just one method, and is not irreplaceable.
Remember the importance of local work.
Table 2a July 29
This morning we have heard three presentations: about the struggle
for the earth, about the influences that neoliberal policies have
over economies, about forms of organization and about the general
life of small farmers.
The first was about the Philippine Farmers Movement (C.M.P.). In
the Philippines, the present government of President Ramos is not
responding to the need for agricultural and land reform, and is
instead, opening up the country to multinational corporations. This
is, of course, displacing more and more small farmers.
The C.M.P. was born in 1985 to organize the small farmers against
development projects and government economic globalization plans.
The C.M.P. offers legal assistance to the farmers and lobbies the
parliament to modify the laws. In addition, they create information
campaigns and organize demonstrations and public protests. Some of
the challenges that the group faces are gathering and coordinating
diverse sectors of Filipino society (universities, urban struggles,
etc.) and making ties to the struggles of small farmers on other
continents. Their struggle lives as a part of the larger general
struggle against neoliberalism.
In the discussion they spoke of the connection between the
farmers' problems and immigration, the organization of educational
campaigns, the destruction of the forests and environment by logging
and mining companies (another foreign aspect of neoliberalism). We
discussed the necessity to include traditional knowledge in the
scientific outlook and the position of the Catholic church, along
with other churches, that have supported the farmers' struggle.
The second presentation was by our CompaÒeros EfrÈn
and Eva from the National Congress of Indigenous People of
MÈxico and coordinators of the Emiliano Zapata Union of the
People of Michoacan, MÈxico under the title "Tendencies,
Concepts and Relations with the Earth" to work for the Commission of
Communal Well-being and the Council of Vigilance. Nevertheless, the
communal lands are in danger because of the amendment to the Article
27 of the Mexican constitution (the article that guarantees
indigenous land-rights). Now the ejidos can be sold as private land
and many small farmers can be kicked off their land. The governments
intention is to do away with social property and sell off communal
land. The communities fight against these reforms and governmental
plans that place the individual above the collective, against the
multi-nationals that want to exploit the mineral resources and
hydroelectricity of Chiapas and against the plans to steal the land.
Efren talked to us about the concept of the Earth as our mother,
not as a thing to exploit or as capital. He also talked to us about
how the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are influencing
the government of Mexico.
Here is one of Efren's poems that speaks of the Zapatista
struggle: (rhyming in Spanish)
Land, work, and home, welfare and security without
impunity.
Necessary public services in the country and the city neighborhoods
and towns.
Protection of the environment and the health of the people, with free
education and guaranteed nutrition. And for the indigenous people,
free self determination.
Human rights for the common people with the full value of their
customs, traditions, and the daily use of their languages.
Consensus decision-making and their own institutions, laws, and
constitution, without any subordination. . .
These are the permanent demands of the Zapatista communities that
struggle in the Lacandon jungle. These are the demands of all those
in Mexico who struggle to defend Mother Earth, our native cultures,
and our communally-owned lands. These lands are very valuable, with
petroleum and precious metals. other demands are national
sovereignty, global independence, democratization with a transitional
government, a constitutional congress, and a new constitution. Also,
we must not forget the indigenous peoples, farmers, workers,
intellectuals, and artists, teachers, journalists and the people in
general. We want real equality and democracy, power for the people,
liberty, justice, brotherhood and sisterhood and peace with dignity!
The third presentation was about the struggle in El Salvador,
presented by the compaÒero Rafael from the Committee of the
Displaced of El Salvador. He told us about the present, post-war
situation. The government created state-run cooperatives, but left
the best lands with the original, rich owners, while the popular
cooperatives have had many problems and few resources. After the war
the small farmers movement continued their mobilization to get credit
for developing their farms. They want to buy the land but it is very
difficult to get loans and if they occupy the land they get removed
by the government.
There are hardly any jobs in El Salvador and the workers can only
get work on the large farms for three months of the year. This is
why they have set up collectives of displaced people. It isn't only
a small farmers movement, but includes street vendors, the unemployed
and the homeless. They carry out many kinds of actions and
activities and fight all kinds of marginalization.
All of the problems of El Salvador have been made worse by the
privatization of public resources, multi-national interventions, the
growth of the consumer market and increasing unemployment. There is
also the problem of the maquilas (assembly factories) that exploit
displaced women, who earn almost nothing for long hours of work. The
displaced populations have two fundamental difficulties: unemployment
with the need to earn a living and the need to organize themselves.
Network Decisions:
To discuss the network, we met in small groups to come up with
ideas that we can propose, and we came up with the following:
-- Expressions of support and the building of international
awareness
-- Answers to the repression of the government
-- Construction of alternative aid
-- Establish an internet network
-- Local work to spread experiences and information
-- Start a multi-lingual newsletter
-- Alternative information
-- Creative protests
-- Set up a list and directory of contacts
-- Support equal and just commerce
-- Holistic ways of life
-- Spread information about the strategies of multi-nationals
-- Share strategies of struggle against multi-nationals
Table 3 July 28
The Destruction of the Earth.
Polluting Energies and Industries.
Ingestion of Toxic Residues.
Climate Change and Desertification.
Water as a Resource of the Few.
Declaration of MoisÈs Ghandi The first general meeting of
health promoters and workers. "Health in the Hands of the People"
MoisÈs Ghandi; the autonomous region of Toztz Chol, Chiapas,
February 1997
In this gathering the issue of health in the indigenous
communities was tackled. The starting point was a definition of the
concept of health in an integrated, global sense:
"Health is to live without humiliation, to be free to
develop as men and women and to fight for a system where the poor and
especially the indigenous people can achieve self-determination and
autonomy."
This welfare incorporates the physical, the mental, the political,
the social and the human spheres. In this context: -- Health is not
an individual but a collective requirement. It is a fundamental
human right. -- Health work must be neutral, attending to each person
without discrimination on the basis of race, color, language, age
religion, gender, etc. -- Responsibilities: Health must be in the
hands of the people, with an awareness that this relies upon the
support of the people.
Currently, health has become a weapon (people are subjected to
interrogation during consultations, male and female patients are
separated to prevent mutual organization...). It is another tool for
destroying the organizational force of the people.
Therefore, without justice, without respect for the dignity of the
people, health has become the property of a small sector of the
population, it exists only for the people who can pay.
These conditions of life and work for indigenous people, which are
already bad, are affected even more during war. This war, not
officially declared by the government, is something real in the
communities, it is something permanent and of "high intensity",
everyday there is more death and bloodshed.
Militarization profoundly affects the daily lives of the people.
All the activities of the army are designed to divide and rule. We,
the communities, denounce the pollution of our rivers, the rape of
our women, the occupation of the schools and public places, the
introduction of alcoholism, prostitution and drugs to our people, the
forcible sterilization of our women and the deliberate obstruction of
the work of health promoters and workers caused by continuous
displacement of the population.
In the final debate there emerged some proposals aimed at
formulating measures to fight against this situation:
-- The withdrawal of the army from Chiapas
-- To cooperate to send medicines--In Naples there are people who are
working on this project (Laboratorio Occupato S.K.A., Callata Trinita
Maggiore, I-80100 Napoli, telephone 0039 338 401494/mobile 0039
81-5420255/5420248).
-- To support this declaration in the Second Intercontinental
Encuentro.
-- To continue to share mutual experiences and to deepen the
discussion on the theme of natural medicines (although it was pointed
out that these are often expensive, e.g. Europe).
-- To consolidate non-governmental support for the indigenous people
of Chiapas and the world.
Table 3 July 29 Networking Against the Nuclear Industry
German activists made a presentation regarding their work against
the German government's transport of high level nuclear waste to a
permanent storage facility in Gorleben.
From 1979 to the present over hundreds of thousands of people have
actively resisted this project and may have succeeded in paralyzing
it. (For example, 100,000 people turned out for a road bloackade in
1996.) Each of three attempts at shipping waste to the facility were
met by thousands of protesters from many different backgrounds who
lined the route for miles, setting up roadblocks and encampments.
About thirty thousand police were required to get a single shipment
through to the facility. Despite their efforts, three shipments have
arrived, carrying eight canisters of radioactive waste. However,
because of the incredible financial and political cost of each
shipment to the government, the protesters feel that the project may
be canceled.
The movement has attacked not only waste shipments, but every
stage in the nuclear chain, including, for example, the program to
reprocess waste for nuclear weapons construction purposes.
The discussion also covered the existence of an international
atomic Mafia, comprised of regulatory officials, business, insurance
executives, and bankers that works to promote the nuclear industry
world-wide and often works to facilitate illegal dumping and
"recycling" of nuclear materials, often working hand-in-hand with the
military. The military in many countries are attempting to reprocess
nuclear waste for use in nuclear weapons. Representatives from
Nigeria and Bolivia testified that illegal dumpings had occurred in
their countries, and comrades from Southern Italy noted that illegal
shipments of nuclear waste, among other forms of illegal traffic,
often passed through their waters.
Future trends for the industry and its dangers were discussed. It
was generally agreed that there is a trend of dumping nuclear waste
(and indeed all waste) in poorer countries, or in poor or
disenfranchised regions of relatively rich countries, such as in
regions inhabited by indigenous peoples. It was noted that this
trend is likely to accelerate as resistance to dumping in "first
world" countries becomes more organized. The group recognized the
need for these movements to the network and share resources with
groups in regions targeted for dumping. It was noted that the
building of a second generation of nuclear power plants in the USA is
largely contingent upon successful construction of a new dump, which
has been delayed for almost twenty years, but may be nearing reality
in Texas and/or California. There is also a proposal for a special
high-level waste dump on indigenous land in Nevada.
By 2004, the French company Framatome and the German company
Siemens developing a new type of nuclear power plant, which they plan
to first install in the Philippines and South America, and then later
in Europe. The multi-national corporation Siemens stands out as one
of the most prominent players in the nuclear industry. For this
reason, there have been suggestions from England and Germany for an
international boycott of Siemens' consumer products, such as their
radios, televisions, etc.
At the same time, North American companies such as Westinghouse
and General Electric have plans to build traditional reactors in new
places, concentrating in Asia.
Group discussion identified common problems and collective
strategies. Problems included:
-- dumping on poor countries or regions
-- the inability to track shipments of nuclear waste from origin to
destination -- lack of basic information about nuclear power and
waste in some are
-- lack of information on alternatives to nuclear energy
-- lack of progressive government/laws on energy policy
-- the "nuclear mafia" which seeks illegal or unsafe solutions to
nuclear dangers
-- defamation of activists by government and industry, i.e.. as
"eco-terrorists".
-- Strategies of resistance discussed by the group included:
-- energy conservation and commitment to alternative energy
production like solar and wind.
-- exporting and importing activists from successful resistance
projects.
-- trying illegal dumpers in international tribunals.
-- boycotting Siemens or other specific multi-nationals.
-- formal annual European conference on nuclear issues.
-- uniting people of different backgrounds in resistance.
-- developing international networks, perhaps using the World Wide
Web and the Internet.
-- develop clearinghouses for basic information on all aspects of the
nuclear chain.i.e.clearinghouse on waster transport.
Table 4-5 July 28
"New Technologies. Nature as a Commodity of the World Elite.
Ecology as Business. Speci-ism, Animal Liberation, Genetic
Manipulation, and Patenting of Life Forms"
India One cannot imagine biotechnology without patents. In the
future knowledge and research will be completely patented. We have
been led to believe that local varieties of species are inferior to
commercial varieties. Due to the inefficiency in conserving seeds,
they ought to be returned to the farmers, since their traditional
knowledge provides for better conservation of seeds. Until this is
carried out, they ought to have their own genetic banks.
Reflections
-- In Germany, industrialization has caused cultural life in the
countryside to suffer tremendously.
-- The introduction of genetically engineered organisms ensures
genetic contamination of local organisms. We offer a general
question. What will we do about this? We would like to propose a
possible solution. Using this contamination in the difficult fight
against transnational corporations that want to control the market.
-- There is a perception that genetic engineering is progress because
it is a way to improve our health. However, the results are in
reality unforseeable, because, among other things, bacteria and
transgenetic viruses produce changes that may cause us harm.
Proposals
1. That there be a network of information for farmers
and citizens to give information about traditional nutrition, giving
consideration to revived traditional methods.
2.That we make contacts with independent scientists that denounce
the effects of genetically engineered food.
3. That we reject every kind of genetic engineering, proposing
instead the revival of the traditional ways of life in each culture.
4. That we do not treat the problem as a scientific problem, but
instead as apolitical question: to be conscious of what you eat,
where it comes from, in what condition it w as produced; in short
live a natural life. Finally , we recognize that there may be
conflicts between some of these proposals, for example between number
2 and numbers 3 and 4.
Table 4-5 July 29
- 1. "Patents on Life" Isabel Bermejo
- 2. "Ecological Agriculture" Angel Caldo
- 3. "Eco-consumption experiences in Rome" Associazione "Le
gramigne"
1. "Patents on Life"
Definition of patent: The first patent was granted to an individual
cook; later on industry became the primary patenting entity.
In the USA there are no laws governing the patenting of biological
materials, yet the practice of patenting animals and humans is
approved.
In Europe, until recently there were no laws about patenting
animlas; now a law has been made to permit it. We are aware of the
difficulty of organizing a struggle against this law and the free
trade.
Some data to keep in mind:
-- 4% of the global wealth is located in the poorest areas of the
world.
-- 95% of biological patents are owned by corporations of the North.
-- 45% of the global economy is predicated upon biotechnology -- 70%
of the world population is dependent on agriculture for sustaining
itself.
-- More than 90% of world biodiversity is found in tropical and
sub-tropical regions of the South. Such biological materials are
strategic for the development of new agricultural, pharmaceutical,
and industrial products.
What can we do?
-- Discussions around the topic and dissemination of the
information.
-- Take care of our own biological material, so not to lose our
culture.
-- Involve and work with peasants in order to increase awareness
around resources and value of the land.
Proposals:
-- With the revision of GATT in 1999 we are going to discuss valid
alternatives; we need to get started with proposals both at the
theoretical and practical levels.
-- Put emphasis on this topic in the political world.
-- Seeing transplants as normal means that we'll develop
contradictions inside ourselves between believing we have full rights
over our body and not realizing the consequences.
-- Getting a prohibition around issuing patents in the European Union
-- We already know about the existence of projects aimed to study
variations in the genetic makeup of tribes and the realization of a
genetic map (the Human Genome Project)
-- They use popular knowledge to speed up the process of obtaining
patents.