table_3c.html
Reports from Nous Barris Information Table
-
Reports from Nous Barris Information Table
collected by Tamara Ford <tamara@home.actlab.utexas.edu>
-
-
- Culture and Information Table, Catalunya
Statement at El Indiano
-
-
- Foreword:
-
- In 1996, in La Realidad, Chiapas, Mexico, thousands of people
from around the world gathered to share the dream of making a
better world and walking together, united. Just as a river unites
various streams, growing stronger and wider as it flows, this is
our network. It is an "electronic river" that unites all of the
people of the world for humanity and for the Earth -- a river that
is for the good of all, irrigating the land, providing fresh water
so that everything blooms. Our network gathers and distributes
information about the struggles of all people; it transmits the
voices of the voiceless to all those who wish to listen, see, and
love the same struggle.
-
- [Note: This document was originally composed in spanish. This
version has been slightly edited from the live English
translation.]
-
- Declaration:
-
- Neoliberalism has created a homogenization of information that
is a basic pillar of a system which imposes a single worldview
which simplifies and reduces human beings to economic producers
and consumers. Information we hear is reduced to simple
entertainment. We say "Stop the show, let's talk about real life."
-
- There are three major points for constructing this network.
-
- 1) Internal Communication (How we communicate amongst
ourselves.)
- 2) Production and Distribution (How we gather, edit, and
communicate
- information.)
- 3) Action (How information is used to support global
liberation movments.)
-
- Concrete Actions
- 1) Break the Monopoly of the Global Media
- 2) Construction of a concrete system of organizing the
network
- 3) Use a new language, clearer and more direct...resist
elite or
- neoliberal terminology
- 4) A net without a central head or hierachies, but with
ways to
- communicate urgent information symbolizing mobilization
- 5) Using ALL forms of comunicating, radio, broadcast,
public television.
- This is a free zone of information, you are not just in the
internet, but
- in the world wherever people fight for humanity and against
neoliberalism
- 6) Participate in analysis and intervention in mass
communications and
- public policy in order to counteract them
- 7) Break the monopoly of professionals (Ed. I need original
spanish to be
- clearer on this.)
- 8) Analyze the agenices that are trying to control social
movements, such
- as the NSA and other intelligence agencies.
- 9) Create fundraising workgroups to finance our efforts and
make the net
- more inclusive for those who don't have access to
resources.
- 10) Recognize the power of the official media and work to
get our
- information there... pursue contacts with the press.
- 11) Create databases of various contact information.
-
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose Statement
Culture and Information Table/Catalunya: Working Group #3
-
- The purpose of this network is to communicate information of
social struggles of all peoples on Earth as a way of achieving all
forms of liberation and a world based on people over profit. Each
of our worlds has a different reality and each communicates in its
own way and it its own rhythm. Communicating and connecting with
one another is a basic human right which is violated by dominant
power structures. Our purpose is to breach the global media
monopoly, and to link people and cultures of resistance using ALL
forms of communication in order to overcome this domination. Not a
goal in itself, but a way to reach goals, the network spreads the
voices of our many realities and enables us, despite great
distances and the oppression of neoliberal control, to reach one
another, to know one another and to meet again.
-
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Culture and Information Table Catalunya (Nous Barris)
Message written for, But not read to, the Plenary at El
Indiano
-
- Greetings and Salutations from the Barcelona Information
Submesa 3 to all of you here now and to all people of the world
who wish to change it. Our group produced a purpose statement and
an outline of work we will do in order to extend an international
network of independent communications as proposed at the first
Encuentro. We will work together in four areas: Internal
Communication, meaning how the network will get information within
the network; Production and Distribution, meaning how the network
will get information from people who need to speak to people who
need to listen; and action, meaning how the network will serve as
a coordinator for global liberation movements. Until we meet again
we will communicate through the web page:
-
- http://www.mygale.org/11/zapata
-
- We wish you joy and revolution. !Alegri'a y Revolucio'n!
-
- *************************
- (longer version)
-
- We conclude that the purpose of our international network of
independent communications is to communicate information of social
struggle of all peoples on Earth as a way of achieving all forms
of liberation and a world based on people over profit. Each of our
worlds has a different reality and each communicates in its own
way and it its own rhythm. Communicating and connecting with one
another is a basic human right which is violated by dominant power
structures. Our purpose is to breach the global media monopoly,
and to link people and cultures of resistance using ALL forms of
communication in order to overcome this domination. Not a goal in
itself, but a way to reach goals, the network spreads the voices
of our many realities and enables us, despite great distances and
the oppression of a market-based society, to reach one another and
continue to meet again. This network is a revolution itself and
exists to bring life to other revolutions.
-
- In order to extend this international network of independent
communications as proposed at the first Encuentro and
Subcommandante Marcos' recentencouragementfor concrete plans we
conclude that the work of building this network can be divided
into 3 areas:
-
- 1)Internal Communication, meaning how we will exchange
information within the network;
2)Production and Distribution, meaning how the network will get
information it produces out into the world;
- 3)Action, meaning how the network will serve as a coordination
system for global liberation movements around the world.
-
- Until we meet again we encourage you to find out more from the
following
- new web page:
-
- http://www.mygale.org/11/zapata
-
- We wish you joy and revolution.
!Alegri'a y Revolucio'n!
-
- On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Andrew Flood wrote:
-
- Starting work
-
- The information sub-table of the culture mesa consisted of a
hundred people meeting as guests of the Ateneu Popular
(Popular/peoples centre) in the Nou Barris suburb of Barcelona.
The first and only item on our agenda was how we were going to
conduct the discussions. Put 100+ activists in a room with this
alone in front of them and your asking for trouble, and indeed
this resulted in an afternoon of discussion on whether we should
meet as one large group or not and the following morning what
areas of discussion each group should have.
-
- We came up with quite a novel solution which recognised the
different reasons people had in coming to the encounter and the
particular needs they had. There were three topics of discussion
-
- 1. A critique of the existing (neoliberal) media
- 2. Our experiences of alternative media
- 3. Constructing a the network of communications between
struggle
-
- Rather then each group taking one of these the first group of
around 25 people discussed 1, 2 and 3. The second group of around
40 people discussed 2 and 3 and the third group also of around 25
people discussed 3 only. This meant those who had come for
developing an analysis or an education could join the first group
while those of us in a rush to construct something practical
joined the C group. Although it wasn't obvious at the time the
process of reaching these decisions was in itself very useful in
drawing the group of 100 or so together and defining the purpose
for which we had come.
-
- Over the next three days I managed to send brief reports out
onto the internet, one of the strange features of this mesa was
how many of the delegates sleeping on mats in school halls were
equipped with portable computers, digital cameras and other
playthings associated with the rich and famous. But with these we
succeeded in putting up on the spot accounts and pictures of the
encounter in process. The sub-group I worked with dealt with the
issue of how to form the network of information between struggles.
The call for this network had emerged from the previous encounter
in Chiapas and was contained in the closing statement.
-
- "That we will make a network of communication among all our
- struggles and resistance's. An intercontinental network of
- alternative communication against neoliberalism, an
- intercontinental network of alternative communication for
- humanity.
-
- This intercontinental network of alternative communication
will
- search to weave the channels so that words may travel all
the
- roads that resist. This intercontinental network of
alternative
- communication will be the medium by which distinct
resistance's
- communicate with one another.
-
- This intercontinental network of alternative communication
is not
- an organising structure, nor has a central head or decision
maker,
- nor does it have a central command or hierarchies. We are
the
- network, all of us who speak and listen. "
-
- The group developing on this started with people from the USA,
Denmark, Barcelona, Italy, Mexico, France, Ireland and Turkey and
we were soon joined by others including people from Belgium and
Columbia. Most but not all of these people had experience in
communication, from Pirate Radio and small circulation magazines
to regional TV stations. We decided to work in English and Spanish
as everyone there had a working knowledge of one of these
languages.
-
- This seems a fitting place to comment on the purpose of the
encounter. Too often such meetings are designed and judged only in
terms of concrete written outcomes. So everything becomes
streamlined to reach these outcomes and commonly democratic
process goes out the window. This may occur directly by having a
pre-set and rigid agenda and eliminating all discussion off this
or in an indirect way by not allowing time for translation and
understanding of what is being said.
-
- It was a strength (if perhaps also at times a source of
frustration) that at the information table at least this was not
allowed to happen. Despite the fact that we were some 100 people
speaking many different languages and from widely varied
experiences, our discussions aimed at generating if not a
consensus then at least the formation of a question to be voted on
that was reached by seeking consensus. Perhaps using the more
traditional way we would have emerged at the end of the week with
a massive blueprint of intermeshing cogs in a global information
network but like so many grandiose documents before it this would
have represented another paper tiger destined to spontaneously
combust in the heat of any real struggle.
-
- What we discussed
-
- We spent much of our time deciding what needed to be
discussed, this in itself of course highlighted many vital
questions. In time I hope some of the detailed agreement reached
in these discussion will be made available on the net, for we made
some effort to produce agreed documents/statements. What follows
is a sketch of the discussion taken from notes and reports I
- kept at the time.
-
- A. What is the purpose of the network
-
- How can we make sure the news/information we transmit is
reliable,
- what sort of guidelines can we have to also ensure it is
relevant?
- How can we prevent the exclusion of women and other groups
from
- the network?
-
- We did succeed in producing an agreed statement of purpose
after much debate.
-
- B. The Internal organisation of the network
-
- Should we be based only on local media, is this the same as
- alternative media?
- How can we have solidarity between different information
networks,
- how can we make our information reliable?
- Should we have a logo to identify the network and if so which
- logo?
- How can we finance this work?
- How can the network make 'expert' opinion and analysis
available
- to any and all of the nodes.
- How can we defend the network?
-
- Much of the discussion around the internal organisation of the
network took place in a visual manner that is not easy to relate
in words. We started off by rejecting the traditional pyramid
structure of news media where local sources feed up to region
level, which feed to national and perhaps the global level before
news trickled down again to other regions. In discussing what a
network without a centre could look like but in recognising that
some people have more time and resources to dedicate to the flow
of information then others, we came to use the human brain as an
analogy. Here the many nodes have major paths that carry
information between them but it is possible for any two nodes to
form a connection and for any connection to improve in speed and
the amount of information it can carry if this is needed.
Therefore many minor paths also exist. There is also a two way
flow of information and feedback on the information that is sent.
-
- This image flowed out of what the network already is in
practise. We considered for instance the path a communique from
Marcos might take after he has written it in the heights of some
Ceiba tree in the mountains of the Mexican south east. Perhaps it
goes on horseback to the nearest settlement, from there by car to
San Cristo'bel where it is typed onto a computer, translated and
suddenly takes more paths, perhaps by fax to newspapers and
solidarity groups on the one hand, on the other it jumps onto the
internet and runs down the telephone lines to listserv's like
Chiapas95. Here it replicates hundreds of times and make its way
onto a desktop in Ireland where it jumps onto web pages and more
lists but also gets printed out and stuck up as a poster in a
bookshop or reproduced and distributed in the Mexico Bulletin.
Simultaneously it has arrive in Istanbul, where it is also printed
out and travels by bus to some distant town and a union meeting.
Multiply this path by thousands and consider all the alternatives
and we see the network already exists without a centre, indeed the
different nodes have not only never met but can be unaware of each
others existence.
-
- So rather then invent and plan a new network our task was to
see what
- existed and see how we could, in a few days develop this
existence and
- improve the flow of information.
-
- C. What methods of communication should we use.
-
- There was a tendency to confuse the idea of the network with
the internet and many people there had either no internet access
or very poor internet access. So while the internet may form one
of the major fibres of information flow it could only be one among
many which would include printed words, fax, phone, radio and
horseback messengers. We also needed to be open to use new forms
of communication and indeed one of the most ambitious papers at
our table called for the setting up of a global TV/Radio satellite
- channel.
-
- Outside of the physical methods of communication we also
discussed other problems with communication.
-
- How do we minimise language and cultural barriers?
- How do we prevent a flood of useless information which drowns
the
- useful content in a sea of words?
- Can we have different layers of information so more
information
- can always be obtained from summaries?
- What sort of feedback mechanisms are possible?
-
- D. Action
-
- How can we show solidarity between the different nodes of
- communication?
- How can we develop the many media forms?
- Can we construct a network of exchange of people so those
- travelling can come into contact with local activists.
- How do we prepare to defend the nodes of our network and the
- network itself from the repression which will inevitable
follow
- success?
- How can we arrange an exchange of skills within the network so
- that people can be trained where this is needed?
-
- One problem with this discussion was the different
expectations people had of the network and of what was possible.
Some had clearly come with the idea that at the end of the week we
would have a detailed plan of a new network of communication and
how it could be put into operation. But the network we have
described is an organic one already in existence and already
growing. Our role was more to begin a description of it and come
up with ways to encourage its growth.
-
- --- end Andrew's notes on Nous Barris