|
Those who want to solve the question of existence of God within the frame-
work of their own
intellectual limitations and narrowness of vision, ask how it is
possible to believe
in an unseen being.
They overlook the fact that sense perception, being limited, can help man
to
know and perceive
only one mode of being; it cannot discover other modes of
being and penetrate
all the dimensions of existence. Sensory organs do not
permit us to advance
a single step beyond the outer aspects of phenomena,
in just the same
way that the empirical sciences cannot carry human thought
beyond the boundaries
of the supra sensory.
If man, through the application of scientific
instruments and criteria, cannot perceive the existence of a thing, he cannot deny its existence simply because it is incompatible with material criteria, unless he disposes of some proof that the thing in question is impossible. We discover the existence of an objective law from within the totality of phenomena that it is capable of interpreting. |
As far as the realities of the material world are concerned, no ra-tional
person
will commonly regard
his not seeing or not sensing a given thing in his everyday
life as grounds
enough to deny it. He will not con-demn as non-existent whatever
fails to enter the
sphere of his sense perception. This same will hold true a
fortiori of non-material
realities.
When we are unable to establish the cause of something in a scientific
experiment, this
does not lead us to deny the law of causality. We say only that
the cause is unknown
to us because the law is independent of a given experi-
ment; no experiment
can lead to the negation of causality.
Is it not true that all the things we accept and believe to exist have
an existe-
nce belonging to
the same category as our own or as things that are visible to us?
Can we see or feel
everything in this material world? Is it only God we cannot see
with our senses?
All materialists are aware that many of the things known to us con-sist
of matters
and realities that
we cannot sense and with which are not customarily familiar.
There are many invisible
beings in the universe. The progress of science and
knowledge in the
present age have uncovered numerous truths of this kind, and
one of the richest
chapters in scientific re-search is the transformation of matter
into energy.
When the beings and bodies that are visible in this world wish to pro-duce
energy,
they are compelled
to change their original aspect and transform it into energy. Now
is this energy —
the axis on which turn many of the motions and changes of the
universe — visible
or tangible?
We know that energy is a source of power, but the essence of energy still
remains
a mystery. Take
electric-ity on which so much of our science, civilization and life
depend. No physicist
in this laboratory — or any-one else, for that matter, dealing
with electrical
tools and appliances — can see electricity itself or feel and touch
its weight or softness.
No one can directly perceive the passage of electricity through
a wire; he can only
perceive the existence of a current by using the necessary
equipment.
|
The air that surrounds us has a considerable weight and exerts a constant
pressure on the
body; everyone bears a pressure of 16,000 kilograms of air. But
we do not feel any
discomfort because the pressure of the air is neutralized by the
inward pressure
of the body. This established scientific fact was unknown until the
time of Galileo
and Pascal, and even now our senses cannot perceive it.
The attributes assigned to natural factors by scientists on the basis of
sensory
experiments and
rational deduction cannot be directly perceived. For example,
radio waves are
present everywhere and yet nowhere. There is no locus that is free
of the attractive
force of some material body, but this in no way detracts from its
existence or lessens
its substance.
Concepts such as justice, beauty, love, hatred, enmity wisdom, that make
up our
mental universe,
do not have a visible and clear-cut existence or the slightest
physical aspect;
nonetheless, we regard them as realities.
Man does not know the essence of electricity, radio waves, energy, or electrons
and neutrons; he
perceives their existence only through their results and effects.
Life very clearly exists; we cannot possibly deny it. But how can we measure
it,
and by what means
can we measure the speed of thought and imagination?
From all this it is quite clear that to deny whatever lies beyond our vision
and
hearing is contrary
to logic and the conventional principles of reason. Why do the
deniers of God fail
to apply the common principles of science to the particular
question of the
existence of a power ruling over nature?
A certain materialist
of Egypt went to Mecca in order to engage in debate, and
there he met
Imam Sadiq (AS.).
The Imam said, “Begin your questioning.”
The Egyptian said nothing.
The Imam: “Do you accept that the earth has an above and a below?”
The Egyptian: “Yes.”
The Irnam: “So how do you know what is below the earth?”
The Egyptian: “I do not know, but I think there is nothing below the earth.”
The Imam: “Imagining
is a sign of impotence when confronted with what you
cannot be certain
of Now tell me, have you ever been up in the skies?”
The Egyptian: “No.”
The Imam: “How
strange it is that you have not been to the West or to the East,
that you have
not descended below the earth or flown up to the heavens, or
passed beyond
them to know what lies there, but nonetheless you deny what
exists there.
Would any wise man deny the reality of what he is ignorant of?
And you deny
the existence of the Creator because you cannot see him ‘with
your eyes.”
The Egyptian: “No one talked to me before in this way.”
The Imam: “So,
in fact, you have doubts concerning the existence of God; you
think He may
exist and He may not exist?
The Egyptian:
“Perhaps so.”
The Imam: “0
man, the hands of one who does not know are empty of all proof;
the ignorant
can never possess any kind of evidence. Be well aware that we
never have any
kind of doubt or hesitation concerning the existence of God.
“Do you not see
the sun and the moon, the day and the night, regularly alternating
and following
a fixed course? If they have any power of their own, let them depart
from their course
and not return. Why do they constantly return? If they are free in
their alternation
and rotation, why does the night not become day and the day not
become night?
I swear by God that they have no free choice in their motions; it is
He Who causes
these phenomena to follow a fixed course; it is He Who
commands them;
and to Him alone belongs all greatness and splendor.”
The Egyptian: “You speak truly.”
The Imam: “If
you imagine that nature and time carry men forward, then why do
they not carry
them backwards? And if they carry them backwards, why do they
not carry them
forward?”
“Know that the
heavens and the earth are subject to His Will. Why do the heavens
not collapse
onto the earth? Why are the layers of the earth not overturned and
why do they not
mount up to the heavens? Why do those who live on the earth not
adhere to each
other?”
The Egyptian:
“God Who is the Lord and Master of the heavens and earth protects
them from collapse
and destruction.”
“The words of
the Imam had now caused the light of faith to shine on the heart of the
Egyptian; he
submitted to the truth and accepted Islam.”