The
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
(Act no. 28 of 1961)
|
|
Sections
|
Particulars
|
|
Preamble |
|
Introduction |
1 |
Short title, extent
and commencement. |
2 |
Definitions of
'dowry'. |
3 |
Penalty for giving
or taking dowry. |
4 |
Penalty for
demanding dowry. |
4A |
Ban on
advertisement. |
5 |
Agreement of giving
or taking dowry to be void. |
6 |
Dowry to be for the
benefit of the wife or her heirs. |
7 |
Cognizance of
offences. |
8 |
Offences to be
cognizable for certain purposes and to be non-bailable and
non-compoundable. |
8A |
Burden of proof in
certain cases. |
8B |
Dowry Prohibition
Officers. |
9 |
Power to make
rules. |
10 |
Power of State
Government to make rules. |
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
THE DOWRY
PROHIBITION (MAINTENANCE OF LIST OF PRESENTS TO THE BRIDE AND
BRIDEGROOM ) RULES, 1985 |
An Act to prohibit the giving or taking the dowry
BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twelfth Year of the
Republic of India as follows:-
THE DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961
INTRODUCTION
The ancient marriage rites in the Vedic period are associated
with Kanyadan. It is laid down in Dharamshastara that the
meritorious act of Kanyadan is not complete till the bridegroom was
given a dakshina. So when a bride is given over to the bridegroom,
he has to be given something in cash or kind which constitute
varadakshina. Thus Kanyadan became associated with varadakshina i.e.
the cash or gifts in kind by the parents or guardian of the bride to
the bridegroom. The varadakshina was offered out of affection and
did not constitute any kind of compulsion or consideration for the
marriage. It was a voluntary practice without any coercive
overtones. In the course of time, the voluntary element in dowry has
disappeared and the coercive element has crept in. it has taken deep
roots not only in the marriage ceremony but also post-marital
relationship. What was originally intended to be a taken dakshina
for the bridegroom has now gone out of proportions and has assumed
the nomenclature 'dowry'.
The social reformers of the nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries have striven hard for the abolition of various social
evils including the evil of dowry system. Long before India gained
independence, the then provincial Government of Sind passed an
enactment known as "Sind Deti Leti Act, 1939" with a view to deal
effectively with the evils of dowry system but the enactment had
neither any impact nor could create the desired effect. During the
last few decades the evils of dowry system has taken an acute form
in almost all parts of the country and in almost all the sections of
society. In a bid to eradicate this evil from the society, the State
Governments of Bihar and Andhra Pradesh enacted "The Bihar Dowry
Restraint Act, 1950" and "The Andhra Pradesh Dowry Prohibition Act,
1958" for the respective States, but both these enactments failed to
achieve the objectives for which they were enacted.
The evil of dowry system was assuming enormous proportions
and the minds of right thinking persons both outside and inside the
State Legislatures and the Parliament were shattered. The matter was
raised in the Parliament in very first session of the Lok Sabha.
Many proposals for restraining dowry were placed in the Parliament
in the form of Private Members Bills. During the course of
discussions on a non-official Bill in the Lok Sabha in 1953, the
then Minister of Law gave an assurance to the House that a bill on
the subject would be prepared in consultation with the State
Governments. In pursuance of the assurance, a Bill was subsequently
submitted for consideration of the Cabinet. The Cabinet then decided
that the proposal might be held in abeyance till the enactment of
the Hindu Succession Act. After the enactment of the Hindu
Succession Act in 1956, the Government felt that a separate
legislation to prohibit dowry was not a matter of urgency. As the
problem continued to increase the issue was against and again
agitated in the Parliament as well as in State Legislatures. On
account of pressure both at political and social levels, the
Government finally decided to process the legislation. On
24th April, 1959 the dowry Prohibition Bill, 1959 was
introduced in the Lok Sabha. After some discussion, the Bill was
referred to a Joint Committee of both the Houses of Parliament. The
Joint Committee presented its report with some amendments in the
Bill. Both the Houses of Parliament did not agree with the
amendments as reported by the Joint Committee and ultimately the
Bill was considered at the Joint Sittings of both the Houses of
Parliament held on 6th and 9th May,1961.
ACT 28 OF 1961
The Dowry Prohibition Bill was passed in the Joint Sittings
of both the Houses of Parliament and it became an Act - The Dowry
Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961) and it received the assent of the
President on 20th May, 1961.
LIST OF AMENDING ACTS
1. Short tile, extent and
commencement- (1) This Act may be called the Dowry Prohibition
Act, 1961.
(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of
Jammu and Kashmir.
(3) It shall come into force on such date (Note: It came into force on
1st July, 1961) as the Central Government may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
2. Definition of ‘dowry’.- In
this Act, "dowry" means any property or valuable security given or
agreed to be given either directly or indirectly.
At or before [(Note:
Subs. by Act 43 of 1986, sec.2) or any time after the marriage]
[(Note: Subs. by Act 63 of
1984, sec.2) in connection with the marriage of the said
parties, but does not include] dower or mahr in the case or persons
to whom the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) applied.
(Note: Explanation I omitted by act 63 of 1984, sec.2).
Explanation II- The expression "valuable security" has
the same meaning as in section 30 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of
1860).
Comment: “…even if the demand
is long after the marriage the same could constitute dowry, if other
requirements of the section are satisfied.” : State of H.P v. Nikku Ram, AIR
1996 SUPREME COURT 67
3. Penalty for giving or taking
dowry.- [(Note: Section 3
re-numbered as sub-section (1) thereof by Act No.63 of 1984, sec.3)
(1)] If any person,
after the commencement of this Act, gives or takes or abets the
giving or taking of dowry, he shall be punishable with imprisonment
for a term which shall not be less than [(Note: Subs. by Act 43 of 1986,
Sec.3) five years, and with fine which shall not be less than
fifteen thousand rupees or the amount of the value of such dowry,
whichever is more:]
Provided that the Court may, for a adequate and special
reasons to be recorded in he judgment, impose a sentence of
imprisonment of a term of less than [(Note: Subs. by Act 43 of 1986,
Sec.3) five years.]
(2) [(Note: Ins. by
Act 63 of 1984, sec.3) Nothing is sub section (1) shall apply
to, or in relation to, -
Provided that such presents are entered in a list maintained
in accordance with the rules made under this Act.
Provided further that where such presents are made by or on
behalf of the bride or any person related to the bride, such
presents are of a customary nature and the value thereof is not
excessive having regard to the financial status of the person by
whom, or on whose behalf, such presents are given .
4. [(Note: Subs. by act 63 of 1984,
sec.4) Penalty for
demanding dowry.- If any person demands, directly or indirectly,
from the parents or other relatives or guardian of a bride or
bridegroom, as the case may be, any dowry, he shall be punishable
with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six
months, but which may extend to two years and with fine which may
extend to ten thousand rupees.
Provided that the Court may, for a adequate and special reasons to be mentioned in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than six months.