Author: James P Hilton
PhD in Public health
James has written ten books and has travelled extensively.

Guest Speaker at Protest 2000 on Father’s Day 3/9/2000 Parramatta Park.

In this brief, yet explosively controversial thesis, James P Hilton puts forward a compelling case that after decades of feminism, the pendulum has swung too far in favour of women’s issues.

James P Hilton is one of a growing number of men who may one day be remembered as founders of the upcoming men’s movement.

Like an idea whose time has come, the world is now ripe for masculinism.

If leading women in out society can claim the title feminist as some legitimate qualification based upon their gender and political views alone, then intellectual honesty demands that all people be afforded the same opportunity.

In PRESUMED GUILTY, James explains, masculinism isn’t about big muscles or being macho. It’s about courageously standing up against the tyranny of political correctness and speaking out in favour of fair treatment for the common man.

Men are people too. Some men are masculinists. PRESUMED GUILTY tells their side of the story.

ORDER YOUR COPY NOW phone direct: 0410-762-110

Title: PRESUMED GUILTY the Invisible War Against The Working Class Male
International Press Publications
International Standard Book Number: (ISBN) 0-646-39769-9
Under $15
RECOMMENDED READING - WHY ISN’T IT ON THE BOOKSHELVES?

As I read with amazement the following article in my morning newspaper, what I need to write about became clear to me. Toilet Training: will men stand for it?

This story circulated by wire services around the globe explained how feminists at the University of Stockholm, Sweden are now pressuring men to sit down to urinate because to stand is, according to the "... leftish intelligentsia..." at the university, "a nasty, macho gesture." The article, using politically correct jargon goes on to attack men who stand up at public urinals, as "sexist" and "...too exclusive."

Is this absurdity for real you ask? You better believe it brother. And ignoring it or telling jokes about it isn’t going to make this problem go away, because these women are dead serious.

That’s where the term "militant feminist" comes from.

Furthermore, they can and do affect out lives in ways most people could scarcely imagine. We are presently in the mist of an invisible gender war and most men don’t even realize it.

This same warped click of so-called women’s leaders, only a few years back tried to re-write the Holy Bible by pushing for deletion of all references to God the Father and turning the Son of Man into "the human one".

It is precisely this brand of feminist mentality, that outrages tens of millions of men worldwide. One such man, Dr Peter Cameron, a lawyer and minister describes his experience with a women enraged by the "non-inclusive" language at one of his lectures. The women complained his speech and manner were "so male-orientated" that she had actually found it difficult to concentrate on what was being said. Dr Cameron responding in writing:

Unfortunately, the toilet bowl and lectern aren’t the only places in modern man’s life we find this twisted logic of the feminist/leftist intelligentsia.

No fellow citizens, this thinking is now the law! If you so much look at some women the wrong way or especially too frequently or for too long, you could be severely punished. Such actions could be perceived as stalking. That’s five to seven years imprisonment in Australia. According to a government brochure on the subject merely "watching" a person can constitute the crime of stalking.

When I was growing up things were straight forward. If a man punched his wife in the nose or used physical violence or threatened physical violence he was called abusive. Likewise, if a man used force or threatened violence to obtain sex he also committed a crime. Rape has always been morally wrong and illegal. And of course, this was proper, but now we have the same kind of women who have designated themselves as the toilet police, getting legislation passed which has effectively censored everybody’s freedom of speech.

They have also, at the same time, forced their unrepresentative views into law here and elsewhere around the globe.

We now have "insulting" language, "verbal" abuse, "emotional" abuse and "financial" abuse to add to the list. Does a heated discussion or debate constitute verbal abuse? If the truth of what you’re saying offends, is it "insulting" language or "emotional" abuse? As tempting as it may be to laugh all of this off, I can’t over emphasis just how insidious and destructive these law changes can be to families as well as to man kinds’ pursuit of happiness and especially his financial freedom.

One brochure put out by the Centre for Women and Families informs us that "Embarrass[ing] a person in public or private", criticizing, or "withholding approval, appreciation, or affection..." is now called "dating violence". It used to be called free speech, constructive criticism, or free choice.

What this means in plain English is that, by stealth, the rules have effectively changed. You no longer have to go as far as threatening to punch your girlfriend or wife to be violent. No, now you’ve already broken the law and are subject to imprisonment, a criminal record, and all the lifelong stigma of a women basher if you merely aren’t as affectionate as she requires? So what if you do not feel like being affectionate. You are now required to fake it, because in the world view of the feminist/leftist intelligentsia, men don’t need rights. Only women do.

It’s been widely reported over the past few years that the building of jails, especially in America, is now a major growth industry. Many city and state economies heavily depend upon the revenue and jobs created.

Robert Lusetich wrote in the Weekend Australian that, " ... spending on prisons...[is beginning]... to overtake [spending on] education, health and road infrastructures in many {U.S.} states...."

With priorities and laws like these, as well as others we will discuss later, it shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that soon we may all know of somebody who winds up in jail. And I bet you’ll never guess which gender fills over 98% of the world’s prison cells?

The feminist/leftist intelligentsia would have us all believe that’s because it’s mainly men who are violent. But a quick glimpse through the daily news paper in any metropolitan area proves that to be totally untrue. What of Lorena Bobbitt, the American women who chopped off her husband’s penis? Or Fiona Major, Australia’s equivalent, who has been sentenced to a six year jail term for using a hunting knife to try and slice off her boyfriend’s penis and scrotum, nearly disembowelling him in the process.

And what of Tonya Harding, the disgraced figure skater who agreed to have her competitor’ knee cap smashed with a lead pipe and more recently found herself convicted for violently assaulting her boyfriend. Or how about Carla Fay Tucker, executed in Texas for plunging an ice pick into a person’s chest. Or the women in North Carolina who carefully seat belted her kids into the family car then pushed it into a lake, killing them all.

According to one news item appearing on 3-4 June 2000 in the Weekend Australian, a report entitled, US National Incidence of Child Abuse and Neglect, found that where maltreatment of children lead to death,"78 percent of perpetrators were female".

The article continued citing similar statistics for Australia. Believe me, there aren’t enough pages in this book or the Encyclopedia Britannica for that matter, to document all the violence inflicted by women. However, in spite of the reality of female violence in our world, prison still remains a predominantly, in fact almost exclusively, male destination.

No wonder there’s a bonafide epidemic of male suicide going on. In Australia alone, more than 20 men a week are committing suicide " ... over child support arrangements ..." Senator Len Harris told parliament,

And even more chillingly we read with alarming frequency of men snapping and taking their wife and even their young children with them.

While such behaviour is clearly outrageous and inexcusable, one can’t help but wonder if a system so completely stacked, start to finish, against males with no real support systems for males, isn’t somehow a contributing factor, if not the primary cause of this tragic phenomenon.

A quick glimpse through the telephone directory of most any major city will reveal dozens of powerful and well financed women’s groups ranging from refuges to trusts to legal foundations....

Now I’m not saying all these organisations and institutions are, in any way, ill-noble or unjustified. I’m simply pointing out that their existence, without a corresponding equivalent for the other half of the world’s inhabitants, is obviously sexist.

However, in spite of the fact that at least twenty men a week are literally killing themselves in this country alone and despite the fact that jails around the world are bursting beyond capacity, 98% of the time with men, all you’ll find in most phone books in the way of support for men, is a few groups relating to anger management and often times they are run by women! No wonder so many men are so angry. And dare I say, with good reason.

As if this wasn’t bad enough, men today are also subjected to a relentless stream of what can only be called anti-male propaganda in advertising and the news media. One such alleged news report repeatedly referred to men as "evil" and featured a photograph of a women’s body being embraced by a ferocious looking tiger which was standing up on its’ hind legs. The authors left no doubt as too the implication, by quoting one woman who seriously described her husband as an "animal".

Regardless of your opinion on unrestrained procreation or your financial preparedness for it, if she gets the urge to nest (and quit earning the money to pay for it) it’s her absolute, unquestioned birthright to do so; and your guaranteed minimum eighteen year financial obligation to pay for it all. Once you give in to her demands, your fate is sealed. There is no escape without someone getting financially and emotionally crushed.

Yes, when she wants offspring you had better be fully prepared. Prepared not only to financially support the children, but also to support your wife, who in spite of being able bodied and having benefited from all the wonderful improvements that decades of feminism has brought, may decide (at her sole discretion) to not earn another cent for anywhere between several months to eighteen years. Regardless of the scenario, you can’t possibly win because they (the feminist/leftist intelligentsia) already lobbied in advance to get all the right laws in place. The game is totally stacked from the start.

DADS AUSTRALIA gratefully acknowledge James P Hilton’s permission to provide excerpts of PRESUMED GUILTY on our website.

Top of Page

Visit the DADs Australia Website