The Case of the Missing States -- An Alternate Analysis -- Political Implications
METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS The FEC considers three variables in its analysis of voter registration and turnout trends. The inter-relationship between these variables can be deceptive. As prices are adjusted for inflation in historical analyses, so, too, must registration be adjusted for population growth to determine trends in political participation. Fluctuations in the number of registered voters are only relevant to the extent that they reflect something more than changes in the VAP. Registration is a meaningful gauge of trends in voter participation only when one considers it relative to simultaneous fluctuations in the VAP. The FEC therefore uses two ratios to detect national trends in turnout and registration: voter registration as a share of the VAP, and voter turnout as a share of the VAP. The Case of the Missing States In analyzing trends in voter registration, the FEC examines the national voting age population (VAP) and national registration. Starting in 1960, the FEC includes all states’ (and the District of Columbia’s) voting age populations in its national totals. For a variety of reasons, however, the FEC does not include voter registration information for every state in its calculation of the national total. In 1960, 16 states’ voter registration figures are not included in the national total, and two states lack data for every subsequent election. The FEC lacks the following states’ registration figures: Because the FEC includes the voting age populations of all states and the District of Columbia in its national VAP calculation, each state for which the FEC does not include registration information is in effect credited with zero percent voter registration. This results in a substantial under-statement of national voter registration as a percentage of the VAP particularly for presidential elections in 1960 through 1972 in particular, and it noticeably skews results for all other elections. The FEC lacks voter registration data for North Dakota and Wisconsin for every year, yet continues to include both states’ voting age populations in the national totals. A brief examination of those states’ voter registration procedures is in order: An Alternate Analysis One could devise an equation to estimate each missing state’s voter registration, but it would inevitably be controversial and of dubious validity. The only feasible way to achieve an accurate estimate of national registration relative to the VAP is to exclude a state’s VAP from the national total unless the FEC also has that state’s voter registration information for a given year. This analysis reveals that the FEC’s methodology substantially skews results: More striking, though, is what these discrepancies show about trends in registration over the past four decades. By this measurement, the FEC’s estimate of the growth in voter registration is more than five times too high. Political Implications Congress established the Federal Election Commission in 1975 as the enforcement arm of the 1971 Federal Election Campaign Act. In Fiscal Year 2000, Congress allocated more than 38 million dollars to the FEC and its 350 employees. Though its primary role is the enforcement of federal campaign finance laws and the administration of public funding for presidential elections, the FEC also reports to Congress and issues press releases and reports regarding national trends in voter turnout and registration. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, commonly referred to as the "Motor Voter" law, instructs the FEC to periodically report to Congress on trends in voter registration. The FEC last wrote to Congress in June 1997. It summarized its findings: States reported a total of 142,995,856 registered voters nationwide for 1996, amounting to 72.77 % of the Voting Age Population (VAP). This is the highest percentage of voter registration since reliable records were first available in 1960. This statement, which the media widely quoted and the FEC has prominently placed on its website, is problematic: Most important, the FEC’s statement to Congress, and its general presentation of data, is very misleading. Since 1960, voter registration has remained virtually constant. The increase between 1992 and 1996 barely compensates for registration’s post-Watergate decline. The FEC’s calculation of the VAP has not changed since 1960. Between 1960 and 1972, though, major changes occurred which substantially increased the number of Americans that were eligible to vote: The FEC says that voter registration increased by more than 18 percent between the 1960 and 1976 elections, the first presidential election year by which all four changes had fully taken place. A closer analysis, however, reveals a different trend. In 1960, voter registration as a share of the VAP was 73 percent. In 1976, voter registration had declined to less than 71 percent. Between 1960 and 1980, registration declined by nearly three percentage points. One can attribute this decline to a combination of ineffective policies, inadequate enforcement, and the deterioration of Americans’ trust and interest in politics following the Watergate scandal. The improved voter turnout in recent years may be a product of the increased ease with which people can register to vote, which would be a welcome development. Even if this is the case, though, the FEC’s analysis of trends in voter registration – and its prognosis for the success of laws like "Motor Voter" – is misleadingly optimistic.