These are just a very small portion of the massive amount of conflicting details that have arisen over time about the validity of the "Manned Lunar Landings" - there is a book available now that has been extremely well researched by the authors - it presents many, many more, questions. I strongly urge all to get a copy of the book called "DARK MOON - Apollo and the Whistleblowers" - by Mary Bennett and David S. Percy ISBN 1 898541 051. A truly enlightening read .

DARK MOON - Click here for the publishers site.

Here's some other sites posing questions -

http://www.md-webdesign.com/moon/

http://www.oocities.org/nasascam/

And to NASA and the Illuminati I say this - You can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time - BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME.

FOOTNOTE: If you have read this far I salute your perseverance and I would like to present one more perspective :- Please think about this - we inhabit a small speck of dust in an overall massive Universe - so far we have managed to reach the limits of endurance for our carbon based bodies in regard to reaching beyond the atmosphere of our tiny biosphere - with the largest rocket ever constructed (Nasa words) they were able to reach a speed of around 24,500 mph on the way to the Moon - NOTE - MILES PER HOUR - now let us look at serious space exploration and just what it would take - think about where we might wish to go - certainly outside our own Solar System as it seems beyond doubt that there is life on any of the other planets - that is life as we know it. So the first thing we have to do is attain a reasonable velocity - at least light speed - to be able to venture to somewhere meaningful - light speed - doesn't sound much when you say it fast - BUT LET'S LOOK AT IT IN REAL TERMS - 186,000 MILES PER SECOND - yes - MILES PER SECOND!!!! - 669,600,000 MILES PER HOUR!! - so it would be safe to say that our 24,500 mph that was acheive by THE MOST POWERFUL ROCKET EVER BUILT - is a mere trifle - comparable to a snail in relationship to an F-16 at full clip - BUT let's say that these clever little dicks do develop space travel at light speed - it would still take a ship 4 years to reach our nearest Universal neighbour - 4 years, now let's look at the logistics of four years (one way) space travel, given that we can find a way to preserve the sanity and health of the crew - let us say we have a crew of three - each requiring x number of calories per day to maintain an exercise program that would prevent muscular attrophy - plus sufficient water to hydrate their bodies and prevent the collapse of internal organs, yes they can recycle bodily wastes to provide a supply but it is a lossy procedure that requires the supplementary input of stored products such as fresh water - also we need to look at the onboard environment - a breathable atmosphere and a reliable continuous power supply - remember they will be increasing distance from the Sun and solar energy may not do the trick - ok, that has our intrepid crew on the way out, they get to some place take a few photos and then turn for home - using of course the gravity of some distant planet to slingshot back toward our little speck of dust - but as they travelled outward they found that their progress was impeded by the gravitational pull of the Sun - and we know that has an effect on space travel because we saw how much the Apollo vehicles were slowed by the Earths gravitational pull until they came within a defined distance from the Moon and were then given a tow by the Moons gravitational attraction - so they would need some form of propulsion that would allow them to maintain light speed - but on the way back they would be travelling at light speed INTO the solar particle discharge - they would be fighting a certain amount of drag and need a considerable amount of fuel - so what do we have - we would have a massive vehicle to start with - it would be enormous to cater for the logistics of human needs alone without taking propulsion into account - a huge vehicle that would have to be made extremely strong to withstand the impact of even the grains of space dust , but what about larger sized debris? imagine the impact at light speed - so stronger would mean heavier, and so the impossibilities mount - BUT THIS IS WHAT NASA IS SUCKING HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY INTO - AT LEAST THIS IS WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE US TO BELIEVE THEY ARE TRYING TO DO!!!!

We are being led down the garden path folks. Just as Congress and the Senate have been led by the nose into maintaining the massive flow of funds into NASA by being led to believe the unattainable is within reach.

Moriamur et in media arma ruamus.