| Why oral cancer is 
spreadingFriday, October 04, 2002This is Oral Health Month. 
                  For at least a hundred years, medical students have been 
                  taught that cancer of the mouth — oral cancer — is a disease 
                  of older people, and that men develop it very much more often 
                  than women. 
 It was perceived as a scourge that 
                  affected those who had both drunk and smoked too much for too 
                  long. It was also thought that poorly maintained, rough and 
                  ragged teeth contributed to the problem, but it is now several 
                  years since dental causes were believed to be an important 
                  aetiological factor.
 
 The pattern of oral cancer is 
                  changing. No longer do five men develop it for every woman: 
                  now it is only twice as common in men, and the gender gap is 
                  closing. Nor is oral cancer still overwhelmingly a disease of 
                  late middle age and beyond. In the past ten years in Scotland, 
                  for instance, there has been an almost 50 per cent increase in 
                  incidence among the under-45s, and in the past 40 years a 
                  fourfold increase in younger patients suffering from it.
 
 There has also been a change in the part of the oral 
                  cavity most commonly affected. Cancer of the tongue, once 
                  rare, has increased in the under-40s by 60 per cent in 30 
                  years. When I qualified, the classic lesion in oral cancer 
                  involved the lip, an unsightly advanced ulcer that had grown 
                  on a lip that had clasped a Woodbine or a pipe for years. 
                  Although the incidence of lip cancer has fallen, this has been 
                  more than compensated for by an increase in tongue cancer — 
                  particularly in men — and of the floor of the mouth in women.
 
 Oral cancer used to be much more common among the poor 
                  and disadvantaged, yet it is now seen increasingly in the 
                  professional classes. This shift has not been fully explained. 
                  No longer can it be assumed that the stereotypical oral cancer 
                  sufferer is an elderly, poor man, addicted to his pipe and 
                  whisky, who was a reluctant visitor to the dentist. This 
                  cancer now affects all classes, both sexes and all age groups 
                  — one of the reasons why dental check-ups should be routine. 
                  The key to treating oral cancer successfully is early 
                  diagnosis. Anyone who has a white sore or a lump, or any 
                  persistent sore or ulcer in the mouth, should tell their 
                  doctor or dentist.
 
 In 1996, a research trust was 
                  established in Peeblesshire in memory of Ben Walton, who had 
                  died in his twenties from cancer of the mouth. Earlier this 
                  year the Ben Walton Trust and the Scottish Oral Cancer Action 
                  Group held a sympos-ium at the Royal College of Surgeons in 
                  Edinburgh at which Professor Saman Warnakulasuriya, of King's 
                  College London, and David Soutar, a consultant plastic surgeon 
                  at the Canniesburn Hospital, Glasgow, discussed the results of 
                  a three-year study into mouth cancers in the under-45s. 
                  Warnakulasuriya has also recently reviewed the risk factors 
                  for cancers of the oral cavity in young people in the journal 
                  Oral Oncology.
 
 The review confirmed the importance of 
                  smoking, particularly when combined with excessive drinking, 
                  in the causation of oral cancers. This combination increases 
                  the risk dramatically, whereas an excessive alcohol intake 
                  alone is not so dangerous. Three quarters of the cases could 
                  be attributed to this cause. Twenty-five per cent of the 
                  patients were non-smokers who had not persistently drunk to 
                  excess. And in the study, as many as 30 per cent of the 
                  younger people had never smoked, and only six of these 
                  non-smokers could have been described as heavy drinkers.
 
 Research workers studied the lifestyles, diet, sex 
                  life, medical history and family history of the patients whose 
                  cancer could not be attributed to tobacco and alcohol.
 
 The patient's previous general health, and in 
                  particular any oral problems, was important. There was a 
                  statistically significant association with anaemia and 
                  glandular fever, as well as with sexually transmitted disease. 
                  Oral thrush and lichen planus were oral diseases which also 
                  seemed to be relevant.
 
 This survey, unlike research 
                  done at the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre in New York, 
                  revealed no association between oral cancer and cannabis 
                  smoking, whereas the American survey showed a dramatic and 
                  disturbing link between cannabis smoking and oral cancers.
 
 Andrea Thompson wrote in the journal Scottish Dentist 
                  about the discussion at the symposium that followed the 
                  contributions of Warnakulasuriya and Soutar. The latter 
                  attracted the attention of, and even alarmed, some of the 
                  audience by his suggestion that one area which needed further 
                  research was the possible connection between oral cancer and 
                  oral sex.
 
 He said that unfortunately it was difficult 
                  to find people who were willing to discuss their sexual 
                  behaviour, but that even so, we had to consider the 
                  possibility of viruses, including those associated with 
                  sexually transmitted diseases, in its causation, as there was 
                  an increase in oral cancer in women who neither drink nor 
                  smoke. HPV (the wart virus) is a possible candidate, as it 
                  already known to cause cancer of the cervix.
 
 However, 
                  Soutar thought that much of the increase in the incidence of 
                  the cancer in women could be attributed to changing social 
                  patterns, as women nowadays not only visit pubs as often as 
                  men, but drink and socialise as much as they do. They also 
                  smoke more than they used to.
 |