rahimtc

The Real Story Of The Rahim-Norhayati Affair

     Last night, Norhayati Mohamad Yusop made a public declaration that she was never involved with Rahim Tambi Chik, the disgraced ex-Chief Minister of Melaka. This has just added a new twist to the whole episode, which not only saw the downfall of Rahim, but also the jailing of Lim Guan Eng. As the say, the plot thickens, but what is the real story behind the Rahim-Norhayati affair - or was there even one in the first place?

     Well, recently I interviewed someone from Melaka, a man very much involved with the whole episode, and here is his story.

     “Rahim called me one day to tell me he was having an affair with this girl and that it was now giving him some political problems. He asked me to help resolve the problem. Rahim trusted me because I already had some business dealings with him.
     He had given me a 1,000 acre piece of land along the PLUS Highway not far from Melaka, so I had an obligation to help him out.

     Actually, in the beginning, Rahim was not having an affair with Norhayati, but with her elder sister, a bar girl whom Rahim was meeting often for sex. One day Rahim phoned her house and Norhayati answered the phone instead. She told Rahim that her elder sister was not home. She also told Rahim that she had been meaning to contact him because she needed to see him about something. Rahim then asked her to come to his office.

     Norhayati went to Rahim’s office that same afternoon and told Rahim she needed to borrow some money. Rahim told her he had no money on him then and asked her to come back the next day, but to come after 5.00pm when the staff had all gone home.

     Norhayati went back the next day as instructed and that was the first time they had sex – right there in Rahim’s office. Since then they met regularly for sex. Norhayati was in it just for the money.

     I, together with two other friends, kidnapped Norhayati and took her to Sungai Golok in Thailand. Rahim gave us RM20,000.00 cash to take care of our expenses.
     In Golok we questioned the girl at length and tape-recorded the conversation. The girl gave us all the details of her sex sessions with Rahim, even telling us Rahim’s sexual preferences, which was quite kinky and at times sick.

     I then brought the tape back to Rahim and played it for him to hear. Rahim then asked me to meet the girl’s parents and negotiate a settlement with them, which I did. The girl’s father wanted RM500,000.00 plus another RM250,000.00 for the girl. I
     also asked another RM250,000.00 for our “team”. All in all Rahim had to fork out
     RM1 million to settle this matter. I also handed the tape to Rahim and assured him there were no more copies though I did make one copy to keep just in case Rahim did not pay me my RM250,000.00.

     The girl was very “hot”. In fact, while in Golok, all three of us also had a go at her. She was a real nymphomaniac and enjoyed sex so much.

     The 1,000 acre land that Rahim gave me was subsequently sold to HICOM but I heard they could not get approval to build the industrial park that they had applied for. The Melaka government wanted HICOM to build low cost houses on the land, which was impossible on that piece of land.

     You can still see the HICOM signboard on the land beside the PLUS Highway if you drive to Melaka. My brother, who is the Chairman of a public listed company, and a partner with HICOM, arranged to sell the land to HICOM. What made me very
     angry is that I did not receive one Sen from the sale of the land”.

Picked from Internet Forums.

What Is The Truth Behind The Rahim-Norhayati Affair?

Early in the week, Norhayati Mohamad Yusop went public to declare that she never had any affair with Rahim Tambi Chik, the ex-Chief Minister of Melaka. The next day, her grandmother also went public to declare she HAD. Which is the truth? Will we ever know?

To get a better understanding of the matter, one has to go back to the time it was all supposed to have happened. News had just hit the streets that Rahim was having an affair with an under-aged girl. Then the girl mysteriously disappeared and her grandmother, who was her legal guardian then, became frantic. Not long after, more than a dozen people were charged and sentenced for having sex with this same girl. To close the whole episode, the Attorney General declared that they do not have enough evidence to prosecute Rahim for the same offense.

It makes one wonder what was the basis of charging this string of “sex offenders”, who were charged based on the mere strength of the girl’s testimony that they did have sex with her. This same testimony, however, was not good enough to charge Rahim. In Rahim’s case they needed evidence – which they say they could not find – whereas the same evidence was not required to find the rest guilty of a crime.

Was this whole exercise merely to demonstrate that this girl was of loose morals and, therefore, whatever she says is not credible? It was credible enough to find everyone else guilty.

Now the girl declares, at that material time, she was forced to lie and one of those who were instrumental in forcing her was a senior police officer. Isn’t this something criminal and shouldn’t the police now be pressing charges against this criminal police officer who had illegally used force to get an under-aged girl to lie?

Rahim says he was the victim and not the conspirator. If so how does he explain the book, “50 Dalil”, which was printed on premises owned by him? Anwar subsequently obtained an injunction against the book but it was still mysteriously found in the bags of the delegates to the UMNO General Assembly, plus it was distributed to all officers in the Ministry. How was this possible unless there was a concerted effort to discredit Anwar and a team of conspirators working in the background?

There seems to be many unanswered questions and the matter can in no way just end here. If Norhayati did lie then, and if she was forced to lie, and as she has now identified who the culprits were, action needs to be taken against these people. However, if she did not lie then but IS lying now, is she being forced to do so? And therefore by whom? This sounds like nothing more than a public confession in a string of public confessions that we have been seeing over this last year.

Norhayati said her reason for “coming clean” is because her name was mentioned in the Anwar Ibrahim trial and she no longer wants her name to be dragged into the trial. Now the truth seems to be slowly emerging. It looks like it all has to do with the Anwar Ibrahim trial. They must be planning to disallow some of the statements made by Dato Seri Anwar from being used by the defense – and he certainly has made a lot of damaging statements since he took the witness stand.

Before this it was Murad’s “confession”. Now it’s Norhayati’s turn. Who’s next? I heard there are dozens more “come clean public confessions” planned - all aimed at ruining Anwar’s credibility and blocking as much of his testimony as possible. What will we see next? The Hong Leong boss “coming clean”? ABRAR’s boss “repenting”? Dato’ Ishak “regretting”? The Menteri Besar of Johor “telling all”?

Well, stay tuned for the next episode in this never-ending drama series called, “I Have Turned Over A New Leaf And Would Like To Publicly Confess My Sins”.

Raja Petra Kamarudin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT MELAKA
CIVIL SUIT NO OF 1985

BETWEEN

JOSEPHINE DORIS NUNIS ... PLAINTIFF

AND

DATUK SERI RAHIM THAMBY CHIK

... DEPENDANT

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

1. The plaintiff is a spinster residing at No. 33 N, Jalan Bandar Hilir, Melaka.

2. The dependant is the Chief Minister, Melaka.

3. The plaintiff first met the dependant at Melaka Straits Inn in early 1982. The plaintiff was then working at the Melaka Strait Inn as a hostess.

4. The dependant befriended the plaintiff and used to take her out to various places including Federal Hotel Kuala Lumpur, Ming Court, Port Dickson, Banglo Kerajaan, Tanjung Kling, Melaka, the dependant's residence at Paya Ikan and Masjid Tanah, Melaka.

5. In early 1982 and on several occasions thereafter the dependant promised to marry the plaintiff.

6. In reliance upon the said promises, the plaintiff allowed the dependant to have the sexual intercourse with her on various occasions at the places mentioned in paragraph 4 herein.

7. In August or September, 1982 the dependant requested the plaintiff to resign as hostess. The plaintiff duly complied with the request.

8. The dependant presented the plaintiff with a diamond ring, a watch and a camera.

9. On or about 10th March 1984 the dependant broke off from the plaintiff without any reasonable cause. A few months later the plaintiff saw the dependant at his office and requested him to keep his word by marrying her. However, the dependant refused to relent.

10. The plaintiff was ready and willing to marry the dependant. However, in breach of his promises to marry the plaintiff, the dependant has refused to marry her.

11. As a result of the dependant's acts, the plaintiff has suffered humiliation and mental anguish and has suffered loss and damage.

WHEREFORE the palintiff prays for:-

(a) Damages;
(b) Costs and
(c) Any further or other relief deemed fit and proper by the Honourable Court.

Dated this 12 day of September, 1985.

(Signed)
Solicitors for the plaintiff

This statement of claim is filed by Messrs Karpal Singh & Co., solicitors for the plaintiff abovenamed, whose address for service is at No. 67, 1st Floor, Jalan Pudu lama, Kuala Lumpur.