Essentials of Organizational Behavior
Chapter 7
Foundations of Group Behavior
NOTE: Stick
to pages 91 – 102
Group
Two or more individuals
interacting and interdependent
who have come together
to achieve particular objectives
Classifying Groups
Formal Group
Informal
group
Command
group
Task
group
Interest
group
Friendship
group
External Conditions
Organization
Strategy
Authority
Structures
Formal
Regulations
Organizational
Resources
Personnel
Selection Process
Performance
Evaluation and Reward System
Organizational
Culture
Physical
Work Setting
Group Structure
Formal
Leadership
Roles
Norms
Status
Size
Composition
Roles
Role
Identity
Role
Perception
Role
Expectations
Psychological
Contract
Role
Conflict
Norms
Set
acceptable standards of behavior
Describe
what should and should not be done within a group
Shared
by the group's members
Suggest
that certain behaviors are "better" than others.
Classes of Norms
Performance-related
processes
Appearance
factors
Informal
social arrangements
Allocation
of resources
What did we learn about norms from the
Hawthorne experiments?
People
were called RATE BUSTERS, FARLAP when
they exceeded normative rates of production in factory environments.
Coined
the term, “Hawthorne Effect”
Conformity
"Norms are often taken for granted so fully that
members fail to realize their existence until a norm has been violated."
Forsyth, D.R.
(1983) An Introduction to Group Dynamics.
Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
Publishing, p. 120
Solomon Asch Studies
NSS
= non-suspecting subjects were “set up” by other subjects
Asked
to look at (2) cards, and compare length of lines on each
35%
of all subjects conformed to WRONG judgements
due to group conformity
Status
A socially defined position or rank
given to groups or group members
by others
Aspects of Status
Formal
status:
–
organizationally
imposed through titles or amenities
Informal
status:
–
acquired
by education, age, gender, skill, or experience
High
status people can resist pressure to conform
Group
members may find the status
hierarchy inequitable
Example of Status and Performance
When
a teenage gang members bowled together, the group leaders nearly always won
the game.
When
individual members bowled without the leaders present they often scored higher
than in the group.
Whyte
attributed the change to status differences within the group.
Source: Whyte, W.F.. (1955) Street Corner
Society. 2nd Ed. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Size
Large
groups better for gaining diverse input to solve problems
Small
groups better at productive output
Five
or seven members is an optimal team size.
Social Loafing
Tendency for individuals to expend less effort
when working collectively
than when working individually
Composition
Demography:
age, gender, race, education, tenure.
Cohorts:
individuals who hold a common attribute.
Advantages of Group Decision Making
More
complete information and knowledge
Increased
diversity of views
Increased
acceptance of solution
Increased
legitimacy
More
accurate
More
creativity
Better
QUALITY decisions
Disadvantages of Groups
Time
consuming
Pressures
to conform
Domination
by the few
Ambiguous
responsibility
Slower
than individuals
Less
efficient
Factors Affecting High Satisfaction
Keep
roles clearly defined
Minimize
interactions with lower status individuals
Keep
groups small