Chapter
One: Strategic Management
Agenda:
-
Overview,
-
Emergent versus Top-Down Strategic Management,
-
Debate between highly rational planning and more fluid,
less rigid forms
-
Attributes of Good Strategic Leaders
To
Do:
-
Sign class culture contract
-
Reminder about photo’s for data sheets:
–
Need by FRIDAY!
-
Reminder about WSJ sign-ups
QUESTION:
Why do some organizations succeed and others fail?
This
course is about strategic management and the advantages that accrue to
organizations that think strategically.
QUESTION:
What (3) factors does company success depend on?
-
The industry in which a company is based,
-
The country (or countries) in which it is located, and,
-
Its own resources, capabilities, and strategies.
-
QUESTION:
Who needs Strategic Knowledge?
-
Different kinds of organizations:
–
Large multibusiness organizations
–
Small one-person enterprises
–
Publicly held
–
Profit-seeking corporations
–
Not-for-profit
organizations.
QUESTION:
What is strategy?
Strategy
Definition ONE: [1+1 = 2]
-
It’s a RATIONAL decision process
Glueck defines strategy as:
–
"a unified, comprehensive, and integrated plan designed to ensure
that the basic objectives of the enterprise are achieved."
QUESTION:
How
does Shell's scenario-based planning system help the company to achieve a
competitive advantage?
Shell's scenario-based
planning system
Tool for getting managers to think strategically about the
interrelationship of environmental changes and the company's performance.
Helps identify kinds of strategies that they should be
pursuing.
Helped the company identify a number of different ways of
lowering costs
–
Survival
when and if prices of their oil dropped to, e.g., $15 a barrel
When this "hypothetical" scenario actually came to
pass, Shell found itself in a much better position than its competitors.
Scenario
based planning is part of thinking rationally...
Of believing that we can make decisions based on facts that
will optimize firms’ outcomes.
-
Strategy
Definition Two:
“Speed is everything”
If you wait to act rationally, you’ll be left in your
competitors’ dust.
Allow strategies to “EMERGE” and evolve over time.
With
this in mind, Mintzberg has defined strategy as:
A pattern in a stream of decisions or actions. The pattern is a product of
whatever aspects of an organization's intended (planned) strategy are actually
realized and of its emergent (unplanned) strategy.
QUESTION:
How does a firm decide....
-
Top-Down
,
-
or
EMERGENT strategy?
Firm needs to determine worth, and fit of emergent strategies.
This involves analyzing the organization's external
environment and internal operations.
An organization's capability to produce emergent strategies is
a function of the kind of culture fostered by its structure and control systems.
Bottom line: It
should consider BOTH sources of strategy.
Components
of strategy include:
-
Corporate mission and major goals,
-
Analysis of the external environment and internal operations
of the firm,
-
Selection of appropriate business- and/or corporate-level
strategies (CHOICE)
-
Design of organizational structures or control systems to
implement the organization's chosen strategy.
-
QUESTION:
What are some of the criticisms of Rationally-Based, “Formal” Strategic
Planning systems?
-
Step-by-step planning =
a fit model of strategy.
Purpose:
Identify strategies that align, fit, or match a company's resources and
capabilities to the demands of the environment.
QUESTION:
What’s wrong with the “fit” model?
1. To gain
competitive advantage with
the technique it must be UNIQUE
for individual firms.
When
all “players” have this capability, we say that the technique is “in
equilibrium.”
What’s wrong with fit model, continued...
2. In the real
world, the only constant is change. Even the best-laid plans
can fall apart if unforeseen contingencies occur.
This fact prompted Royal Dutch/Shell to pioneer the scenario
approach to planning discussed in Strategy in Action 1.1.
3. Treat planning
as an exclusively corporate-level function.
Ivory
tower approach can result in strategic plans that are formulated in a vacuum by
planning executives who have little understanding or appreciation of operating
realities, & will not be involved in implementation.
4. Prompts
management to focus too much upon degree of fit between the existing resources
and current environmental opportunities—and not enough on
building new resources and capabilities to create and exploit future
opportunities.
QUESTION:
Are all managers good strategists?
No,
not all.
Why?
Cognitive biases, Groupthink
Cognitive
Bias, Groupthink
We tend to fall back on certain rules of thumb, or heuristics,
when making decisions, and sometimes they lead to severe and systematic errors
in the decision-making process.
Cognitive
Bias, continued...
Prior hypothesis bias
Decision
makers have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables,
and make decisions on the basis of these beliefs, even when presented with
evidence that their beliefs are wrong.
Cognitive
Bias, continued...
Escalating commitment
Occurs
when, having already committed significant resources to a project, decision
makers commit even more resources if they receive feedback that the project is
failing.
Reasoning by analogy involves use of simple analogies to make sense out of
complex problems -- oversimplify.
Cognitive
Bias, continued...
Representativeness refers to the tendency on
the part of many decision makers to generalize from a small sample or even a
single vivid anecdote.
The illusion of control
is the tendency on the part of decision makers to overestimate their ability to
control events.
Cognitive
Bias, continued...
Groupthink occurs when a group of decision
makers decides on a course of action without questioning underlying assumptions.
Typically, a group coalesces around commitment to a person or policy.
QUESTION: Was Howard Johnson
a logical acquisition for Imperial?
No, proved to be a costly mistake.
Why did the company make the acquisition?
Seems to be a classic case of groupthink. CEO decided
that the company was a good buy, yes men and women surrounding him failed to
point out serious flaws in the plan.
QUESTION: What tools can we
use to combat cognitive bias, groupthink:
Two techniques that have been proposed to guard against
cognitive bias, groupthink: devil's
advocacy and dialectic inquiry.
Tools to combat cognitive bias, groupthink: Devil’s Advocacy
Devil's advocacy involves the generation of a
plan and a critical analysis of it.
A member of the group acts as the devil's advocate, bringing
out all the reasons why the proposal should not be adopted.
Tools to combat cognitive bias, groupthink: Dialectic inquiry
Dialectic inquiry involves generation of a
plan and a counterplan reflecting plausible but conflicting courses of action.
A debate between advocates of the plan and those of the
counterplan should be considered by senior strategic managers.
After debate, ideas from competing plans are synthesized.
Skills/
Attributes of a Good Strategic Leader
-
Vision, eloquence, and consistency.
-
Commitment.
-
Being well informed.
-
Delegation and empowerment.
-
Political astuteness.